A lot of the recent "innovation" is a bad bargain for anyone not pushing a competitiv
#176
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
American cars of the 60s through about 1972 are the most collectable. Any sporty car from that era - pony cars, muscle cars, sports cars - all crazy expensive. And of course, the number each model produced with what specifications is known, and so the rare ones get even more ridiculous prices. After '72, American cars kept getting worse year after year, not really recovering till about 2000. Nowadays they're pretty good. Of course, so are everyone else's cars.
So, yeah, a 1978 car would not be very desirable. Maybe collectable as a novelty?
So, yeah, a 1978 car would not be very desirable. Maybe collectable as a novelty?
#177
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,123
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10504 Post(s)
Liked 12,037 Times
in
6,164 Posts
Interestingly, that was the era when European sports cars, especially sports sedans, caught on here. The much-loved American muscle cars of the 60s had huge horsepower, but brakes and suspension were not much advanced from the 1940s. So they could go fast in a straight line, and when you tried to turn, they continued to go fast in a straight line.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#178
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
Interestingly, that was the era when European sports cars, especially sports sedans, caught on here. The much-loved American muscle cars of the 60s had huge horsepower, but brakes and suspension were not much advanced from the 1940s. So they could go fast in a straight line, and when you tried to turn, they continued to go fast in a straight line.
#179
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,123
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10504 Post(s)
Liked 12,037 Times
in
6,164 Posts
Yeah, but we didn't know that!
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
#180
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
#181
Junior Member
You must be thinking of Russian planes. Virtually all the fasteners on both Boeing and Airbus jets are inch based, not metric. They don't even make the pretense the bicycle industry prefers like 22.2 (7/8) or 25.4 (1") .
#182
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,548
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18423 Post(s)
Liked 4,540 Times
in
3,372 Posts
#183
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 1,060
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 529 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 255 Times
in
185 Posts
Does it matter?
You can buy bikes with different brand names one them, with exactly the same frame. Same strength. Same weight. You can say some are fake copies. Does it matter which is real, and which is fake. It is often just a case of a little-known brand using the same frame as a well known brand.
You can buy a copy of a Shimano derailleur. Shimano might be concerned about having less sales because of these copies, It is the same to use on the bike. In China they don't care.
You can buy bikes with different brand names one them, with exactly the same frame. Same strength. Same weight. You can say some are fake copies. Does it matter which is real, and which is fake. It is often just a case of a little-known brand using the same frame as a well known brand.
You can buy a copy of a Shimano derailleur. Shimano might be concerned about having less sales because of these copies, It is the same to use on the bike. In China they don't care.
#184
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,548
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18423 Post(s)
Liked 4,540 Times
in
3,372 Posts
My first CF bike was a mid-late 90s Cadex (round carbon tubes bonded to alloy head tube, BB etc.). It was a very good ride, but modem monocoque carbon bikes are a big improvement in both efficiency and comfort. Although it’s hard to know how much of that improvement is from the frame vs modem tyre technology. But from a pure engineering POV modem carbon frames are light years ahead of those early bonded carbon/alloy efforts. My Cadex still had an alloy fork too, which I remember feeling a bit harsh. It would be interesting to ride one of those bikes today just to feel the difference directly back-to-back.
The "Monocoque" frames are not truly made as a one-piece construction. Just they use a smooth lug transition.
But, I have no doubt there are benefits of the OS tubes, shaped tubes, and designs that are more than forming CF as if it was steel pipes.
I suppose I need to do some tuning, but my old Colnago Super just wasn't comfortable descending on a 15% slope or so. The C40 did very well (except that I broke a couple spokes on the descent, perhaps too much HP).
#185
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,009
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3984 Post(s)
Liked 7,435 Times
in
2,991 Posts
How does one generate so much power on a 15% descent that you break spokes?
Likes For tomato coupe:
#186
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,647
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 4,070 Times
in
1,439 Posts
It seems Americans pay more for bicycles than people in most parts of the world. Part of this is due to a large proportion of Americans wanting the latest high tech bikes. I am not saying it doesn't happen everywhere to some extent. It just seems a higher proportion of Americans think like that.
Likes For MattTheHat:
#187
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,647
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 4,070 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Likes For MattTheHat:
#188
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,548
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18423 Post(s)
Liked 4,540 Times
in
3,372 Posts
As an interesting aside- there just wasn't a whole lot of innovations with the bicycle, between saying 1950 to 1980. This was the TdF winning bike from 1947:
Coppi
TdF bikes from 1978:
Hinault
The bikes look really similar - with steel lugged frame, down tube shifted derailleurs, toe strap pedals, tubular tires and side pull caliper brakes. There just wasn't too much in the way of innovations during those years. In a sense, a lot of what we think of as 'classic bikes', are a product of those 30-40 years of stagnation.
Coppi
TdF bikes from 1978:
Hinault
The bikes look really similar - with steel lugged frame, down tube shifted derailleurs, toe strap pedals, tubular tires and side pull caliper brakes. There just wasn't too much in the way of innovations during those years. In a sense, a lot of what we think of as 'classic bikes', are a product of those 30-40 years of stagnation.
1950 just followed a few decades of rapid change in the bike world. Cambio Corsa?
There likely are a number of subtle differences. 1980 would have followed the center pull era... So, side-pulls ==> center-pulls ==> side-pulls.
I can't tell, but those may well have been cottered cranks.
Reynolds 531 would have been quite old, but not necessarily all bike tubes. Butted tubing?
Chainstays were generally a round profile up until mid 70's or early 80's, when oval shapes began to dominate.
2x3 or 2x4 gearing may well have dominated around 1950. By 1980, that would have been either 2x6 or 2x7.
What is with all the chain slack with the 2nd rider in the 1950's photo? Man, is that a front suicide shifter on the second bike?
Oh, and metal vs plastic water bottles.
None of the riders have helmets? By the mid 70's, I had my Skid Lid. Hair nets were still popular. And we were getting the first generation of Bell Helmets. I'm sure helmets were required for my racing, and even the Skid Lids were frowned upon (too much open space). But, that would have been in the juvenile categories.
#189
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,548
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18423 Post(s)
Liked 4,540 Times
in
3,372 Posts
I was trying to reach 55 MPH (didn't quite make it, but hit over 50 MPH).
I have pretty high gearing on that bike, and was very close to spinning out.
The HP equation is a combination of RPM + torque. I frequently mash in at relatively slow speeds. That hill took me way out of my spinning comfort zone. One doesn't count the hill as part of that equation, but I was ferociously spinning in my highest gear. So, I broke a spoke on that hill, replaced it in the field, and broke a spoke on the next hill descent. And have largely abandoned that set of wheels.
I don't have a power meter at this point. If Strava didn't mess up the stats too much, I could probably figure out how fast I was going when I broke the spokes, and calculate the approximate RPM. I know the cassette, but have to verify the crankset I had on that bike at the time.
Likes For UniChris:
#191
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,009
Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3984 Post(s)
Liked 7,435 Times
in
2,991 Posts
#192
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Eugene, Oregon, USA
Posts: 27,548
Mentioned: 217 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18423 Post(s)
Liked 4,540 Times
in
3,372 Posts
That hill's slope varies considerably So 100 yards of steep, then less slope, the steeper again.
I'm not doing a riding the top tube descent (some of the pro riders are pedaling while off the saddle and on the top tube). But, I can definitely go faster pedaling.
The next hill where I broke the second spoke was about a 6% descent, and I can definitely go faster pedaling, especially pedaling at the rounded top of the hill, as well as at the leadout at the bottom.
I'm not doing a riding the top tube descent (some of the pro riders are pedaling while off the saddle and on the top tube). But, I can definitely go faster pedaling.
The next hill where I broke the second spoke was about a 6% descent, and I can definitely go faster pedaling, especially pedaling at the rounded top of the hill, as well as at the leadout at the bottom.
#193
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Posts: 490
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 252 Post(s)
Liked 67 Times
in
48 Posts
I have no idea what you are talking about with old movies. Optical sound was actually fairly high quality and has transferred to digital quite nicely. As for "poor picture" , that's absurd unless you're one of those "black & white is automatically bad" people. Seriously, learn something about cinematography before you'd say anything as silly as they'd lose their appeal if remastered. Watch TCM for a day and tell us those prints haven't been restored to pristine through remastering and are a hell of a lot more fun to watch than the worn-out prints that used to tour theatres and get shown on TV.
Generally I fear re-mastering efforts, except in cases like rescuing film from a dustbin like My Fair Lady and probably many others. But again, I don't count myself as a movie historian or moviephile since my life priorities are elsewhere, I just enjoy those early movies.
#194
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,099 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I have worded it misleadingly, actually I do watch TCM and I am quite a fan of B&W movies (although I am not a 'moviephile' (as in audiophile )) and still have to say, some of the old movies have atrocious quality, picture and sound. Some are virtually borderline bad (I think mostly 1930s era). There was a fashion at some time or a genre of dark picture when nowadays you can just about only make out the shapes moving on screen and some movies have strong hiss in the sound and again, there was an era in those days when movie actors spoke slang and half mousing it just as people speak on streets in real life, which, coupled with low quality sound, makes it hard for even native English speakers to catch all that is spoken.
Generally I fear re-mastering efforts, except in cases like rescuing film from a dustbin like My Fair Lady and probably many others. But again, I don't count myself as a movie historian or moviephile since my life priorities are elsewhere, I just enjoy those early movies.
Generally I fear re-mastering efforts, except in cases like rescuing film from a dustbin like My Fair Lady and probably many others. But again, I don't count myself as a movie historian or moviephile since my life priorities are elsewhere, I just enjoy those early movies.
I could go on about all the great movies that have been recovered from the dustbins (there are hundreds or more of them), but it's way off-topic.
#195
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,628
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4500 Post(s)
Liked 4,977 Times
in
3,077 Posts
Does it matter?
You can buy bikes with different brand names one them, with exactly the same frame. Same strength. Same weight. You can say some are fake copies. Does it matter which is real, and which is fake. It is often just a case of a little-known brand using the same frame as a well known brand.
You can buy a copy of a Shimano derailleur. Shimano might be concerned about having less sales because of these copies, It is the same to use on the bike. In China they don't care.
You can buy bikes with different brand names one them, with exactly the same frame. Same strength. Same weight. You can say some are fake copies. Does it matter which is real, and which is fake. It is often just a case of a little-known brand using the same frame as a well known brand.
You can buy a copy of a Shimano derailleur. Shimano might be concerned about having less sales because of these copies, It is the same to use on the bike. In China they don't care.
#196
Full Member
Uninformed people are uninformed for a reason. Most people have made bad choices in their life. Most learn from the experience. Some do not.
#197
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 2,857
Bikes: Road bike, Hybrid, Gravel, Drop bar SS, hard tail MTB
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1218 Post(s)
Liked 298 Times
in
214 Posts
Is a consumer better off riding a 1978 steel road bike that's maintainable with simple tools I bought 40 years ago? Is much of the recent "innovation" is a bad bargain for anyone not pushing a competitive racing edge. Eg, Is carbon anything as an anti-feature. ?
I love that I can fit a 650bx48 under a bike that typical has a max tire size of 700x30.
I love index shifting.
I love clutched rd.
I love tubeless.
I love the stiffness of thru axle.
I love the innovation of newer tires, more supple, longer lasting.
I would have bought the 853 steel frame over the carbon with the RLT9. Based on Standover. Can't really complain on carbon frame. But the 853 definitely mutes vibrations more.
Wheels, oh I do love innovation on hubs, freewheel ratchets.
And after bending my aluminum wheel. I love the innovation of carbon wheels. Maybe I would have cracked it on same curb that bent my Al wheel? *hard to say*
It is even harder to desire to debate on what is a bad bargain for you, Joe, Jill, Todd etc...
I just know that I am thankful for innovation, a free market, all with the ability to choose options and choose innovations as I see fit for myself.
Life would seriously suck bad, if my only options in life (cycling) where the options that someone else chose for me.
I loved my custom hard tail giant Talon 29er. Sold it though. I deemed it wasn't worth buying hoops that were tubeless ready. I had previously tried ghetto tubeless. It held air but made wheels wonky. I also didn't want to invest in tubeless hoops for QR standards. So I sold it.
Is tubeless for all? No, tubes are fine. But when I had 15 goat heads in one ride. 10 front 5 rear. After having 2 front 1 rear.
Funny thing is, I walked in to buy tubes. But they had a bike in my size that I've been kind of wanting... it was an easy choice.
In closing, free markets drive innovation. I love it!
#198
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Northampton, MA
Posts: 1,909
Bikes: 36" Unicycle, winter knock-around hybrid bike
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 930 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
282 Posts
Mostly the misrepresentation of what an average casual cyclist needs in order for a bike to be decent and sufficient for rides far beyond anything they're likely to attempt, and how little benefit most upsell (which in a bike shop may be even the minum sell) will have.
If someone already does a club or group of friends ride weekly and has decided they want to plunk more money into a passion, that I get. I suspect there's still a degree of misinformation there but it's more in the realm of willfully overlooking the ample evidence in front of them that it's mostly about the rider not the bike.
If it's what you do for fun or exercise and putting more money into it triggers reward centers, that's fine.
If someone already does a club or group of friends ride weekly and has decided they want to plunk more money into a passion, that I get. I suspect there's still a degree of misinformation there but it's more in the realm of willfully overlooking the ample evidence in front of them that it's mostly about the rider not the bike.
If it's what you do for fun or exercise and putting more money into it triggers reward centers, that's fine.
Last edited by UniChris; 07-07-21 at 11:22 AM.
#199
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,123
Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10504 Post(s)
Liked 12,037 Times
in
6,164 Posts
I think in this case it's more a matter of being new to the field of bikes and components. Being new to it, the amount of information these days is overwhelming and figuring out what sources to trust is daunting when you have no experience to use to guide you.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."
"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
Likes For genejockey:
#200
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: Allen, TX
Posts: 2,647
Bikes: 2021 S-Works Turbo Creo SL, 2020 Specialized Roubaix Expert
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 766 Post(s)
Liked 4,070 Times
in
1,439 Posts
Mostly the misrepresentation of what an average casual cyclist needs in order for a bike to be decent and sufficient for rides far beyond anything they're likely to attempt, and how little benefit most upsell (which in a bike shop may be even the minum sell) will have.
If someone already does a club or group of friends ride weekly and has decided they want to plunk more money into a passion, that I get. I suspect there's still a degree of misinformation there but it's more in the realm of willfully overlooking the ample evidence in front of them that it's mostly about the rider not the bike.
If it's what you do for fun or exercise and putting more money into it triggers reward centers, that's fine.
If someone already does a club or group of friends ride weekly and has decided they want to plunk more money into a passion, that I get. I suspect there's still a degree of misinformation there but it's more in the realm of willfully overlooking the ample evidence in front of them that it's mostly about the rider not the bike.
If it's what you do for fun or exercise and putting more money into it triggers reward centers, that's fine.