Zipp Firecrest Wheelset
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 898
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
Exact same idea as the Zipp FC and HEDs. Wider rim with leading/trailing edge aerodynamic principles, and designed for 10+ degree xwind. They look pretty nice also. If anybody is planning on buying new wheels, the D3, FC or new Heds are the way to go IMO.
#27
pan y agua
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 31,304
Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike
Mentioned: 17 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1447 Post(s)
Liked 728 Times
in
373 Posts
I've got multiple sets of Zipps. Old 404's, 303's with the torroidal, dimpled, rim, 808's with the torroidal rim, and now 404 FC clinchers.
I can't say I can tell any speed difference between the new and old 404's. Of course, any difference would be small enough as to not be perceptable.
As for handling in cross winds, the new design might be a little less prone to getting moved around. However, I haven't ridden them enough in stiff winds to convince myself that's true, or to rule out the placebo effect.
I can't say I can tell any speed difference between the new and old 404's. Of course, any difference would be small enough as to not be perceptable.
As for handling in cross winds, the new design might be a little less prone to getting moved around. However, I haven't ridden them enough in stiff winds to convince myself that's true, or to rule out the placebo effect.
__________________
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
You could fall off a cliff and die.
You could get lost and die.
You could hit a tree and die.
OR YOU COULD STAY HOME AND FALL OFF THE COUCH AND DIE.
#28
Sucking Wheel at the back
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Bristol, VA
Posts: 779
Bikes: Lynskey Helix Sport, Lynskey M290, Cervelo S3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
ENVE 5 year warranty. Light and lovely. Have a set of the 45's and love them.
#29
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 1,076
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've got a set of 303 FC...they're nothing special. I certainly thought they would ride nicer than they do. They're heavy as well. Go with ENVE.
#30
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 703
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Clincher or tubular? What year? I just picked up a pair of 2008 clinchers but haven't had a chance to ride them yet. Need new cassette, skewers. Besides the extra weight, what don't you like from them? What were you expecting?
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
In Tour's most recent data, with data translated to 25mph, the Zipp 808 had an aero drag equivalent to 6.2 watts; the Hed Jet 9(similar shape but non parallel brake tracks) measured 9.3 watts and a deep V Cole rim(similar to what Boyd, et al use) measured 13 watts. All well outside of the margin of error for a good wind tunnel.
There are similar differences for shallower wheels. And actually, ironically enough, some of the shallower wheels can have greater disparities than the deeper wheels because shape and spokes matter more.
Anyway, to the OP, Bontrager has a new type of wheel out so anyone giving feedback on the old wheels may not be as relevant to your purchase because they changed from a carbon fairing construction to a solid rim like Zipp. Though, I also don't know what your LBS is trying to sell you. The difference between your carbones and the older 404 shape would be more about weight and less about aero.
I'd say that just about all the wheel companies using the new blunt inner edge, wide, curved walls should be a good step up from your Carbones. Enve, Bontrager, Hed, Zipp and Rolf are all using a newer rim shape like this.
#32
Pointy Helmet Tribe
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Offthebackistan
Posts: 4,338
Bikes: R5, Allez Sprint, Shiv
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 519 Post(s)
Liked 627 Times
in
295 Posts
^^ The Tour magazine tested the old Jet shape (i.e., not SCT). Enve's testing put HED ahead of the Zipp FCs.
AFAIC, I take it to mean that Zipp and HED are pretty much at par in terms of performance.
I ended up going with HED Stingers, simply b/c (a) they are cheaper (although I'd have spend the extra $$ if I felt the Zipps were better) and (b) you see quite a few Pro-Tour guys riding re-badged HED wheels or rims and (c) Stingers are tough enough to be daily-riding wheels.
AFAIC, I take it to mean that Zipp and HED are pretty much at par in terms of performance.
I ended up going with HED Stingers, simply b/c (a) they are cheaper (although I'd have spend the extra $$ if I felt the Zipps were better) and (b) you see quite a few Pro-Tour guys riding re-badged HED wheels or rims and (c) Stingers are tough enough to be daily-riding wheels.
#33
Hanging On
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 872
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I've got multiple sets of Zipps. Old 404's, 303's with the torroidal, dimpled, rim, 808's with the torroidal rim, and now 404 FC clinchers.
I can't say I can tell any speed difference between the new and old 404's. Of course, any difference would be small enough as to not be perceptable.
As for handling in cross winds, the new design might be a little less prone to getting moved around. However, I haven't ridden them enough in stiff winds to convince myself that's true, or to rule out the placebo effect.
I can't say I can tell any speed difference between the new and old 404's. Of course, any difference would be small enough as to not be perceptable.
As for handling in cross winds, the new design might be a little less prone to getting moved around. However, I haven't ridden them enough in stiff winds to convince myself that's true, or to rule out the placebo effect.
#34
I need speed
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I race on 404FC tubies. It's not that they don't get pushed around in a heavy crosswind, it's that the push is balanced so that it doesn't create turning moment. I got the Zipp tubies because they are both aero and light, so I can use them no matter what race is on the schedule: crit, RR, HC... whatever.
The only issue I've had, and it hasn't been diagnosed beyond reasonable doubt, is some front end wobble at speed. The wobble is limited to the front wheel - it isn't that harmonic wobble that involves the entire frame. At high speeds, with the wind direction fluctuating, the front wheel gets a bit "skitterish". Enough that people have commented, and well, having the wheel move around at 45-50mph in a RR pack is a touch off-putting. I think it is the laminar airflow attaching and detaching from the foil. The wheel appears to seek a line through the wind fluctuations. I just had a new tire put on, however, and looking at the old one with no air, I don't think the glue job was particularly good. In fact, I got a clicking from the valve stem on the rim, and think that indicated a possible gluing issue. In any event, I haven't experienced the wobble on the new tire, but then I haven't ridden in the same conditions - crit's only so far, and without significant wind. So we'll see. But I love the wheels in all other respects. My training wheels are Bont Race XXX clinchers (paired spoke version), and they are also light and ride great, but I'll take the Zipps any day. If it weren't for the hassle and cost of tubular repair, they'd never leave the bike.
The only issue I've had, and it hasn't been diagnosed beyond reasonable doubt, is some front end wobble at speed. The wobble is limited to the front wheel - it isn't that harmonic wobble that involves the entire frame. At high speeds, with the wind direction fluctuating, the front wheel gets a bit "skitterish". Enough that people have commented, and well, having the wheel move around at 45-50mph in a RR pack is a touch off-putting. I think it is the laminar airflow attaching and detaching from the foil. The wheel appears to seek a line through the wind fluctuations. I just had a new tire put on, however, and looking at the old one with no air, I don't think the glue job was particularly good. In fact, I got a clicking from the valve stem on the rim, and think that indicated a possible gluing issue. In any event, I haven't experienced the wobble on the new tire, but then I haven't ridden in the same conditions - crit's only so far, and without significant wind. So we'll see. But I love the wheels in all other respects. My training wheels are Bont Race XXX clinchers (paired spoke version), and they are also light and ride great, but I'll take the Zipps any day. If it weren't for the hassle and cost of tubular repair, they'd never leave the bike.
#35
I need speed
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I don't care what you've ridden. The data is well established, it's not just Zipp. Most companies who actually use wind tunnels and cfd to design their wheels have figured out that the best way to design a wheel is from the nose->out, with essentially a cut off blunt airfoil.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 1,677
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
You're right that the hard part about understanding for consumers why "deep carbon wheels" perform so differently is the variety of ways in which the air passes over them. Tire as leading edge, tire as trailing edge, tire as leading and trailing edge(think top and bottom of the wheel), the way in which the wheel "pushes" air. It seems to be easier to say "yay, carbon wheels are fast" than to actually consider how the wheel moves through the air and how the tire effects the system as a whole.
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Vienna, VA
Posts: 703
Bikes: 2010 Fuji Roubaix 2.0. 2006 Iron Horse Azure Expert
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#39
I need speed
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 5,550
Bikes: Giant Propel, Cervelo P2
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well I know that, its why they design, as I put it, from the nose out. I was actually referring to the kamm tail concept as the tire being on the trailing edge of the airfoil. I also suspect that the blunter airfoil(than for say a bike tube) is the result of the horizontal aspect ratio being so varied acrossed the wheel.
You're right that the hard part about understanding for consumers why "deep carbon wheels" perform so differently is the variety of ways in which the air passes over them. Tire as leading edge, tire as trailing edge, tire as leading and trailing edge(think top and bottom of the wheel), the way in which the wheel "pushes" air. It seems to be easier to say "yay, carbon wheels are fast" than to actually consider how the wheel moves through the air and how the tire effects the system as a whole.
You're right that the hard part about understanding for consumers why "deep carbon wheels" perform so differently is the variety of ways in which the air passes over them. Tire as leading edge, tire as trailing edge, tire as leading and trailing edge(think top and bottom of the wheel), the way in which the wheel "pushes" air. It seems to be easier to say "yay, carbon wheels are fast" than to actually consider how the wheel moves through the air and how the tire effects the system as a whole.
#41
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 2,201
Bikes: Roubaix / Shiv
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
A large bulk of the population probably doesn't have to worry about those circumstances, but people in in CA or the rockies might care. The OP didn't have a location listed.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,657
Bikes: Cervelo S2, Workswell 062, Banshee Spitfire
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
^ I have yet to hear of a melted FC CC either. IIRC, there was a thread on RBR a few months back where a few guys warped their "Edge" labeled wheels.
I just picked up a pair of 404 FC tubulars. I don't have enough miles on them to really make a comparison.
According to Competitive Cyclist, the 303 FC clincher weighs 1527. The 2009 is closer to 1700 gr.
I just picked up a pair of 404 FC tubulars. I don't have enough miles on them to really make a comparison.
According to Competitive Cyclist, the 303 FC clincher weighs 1527. The 2009 is closer to 1700 gr.
Last edited by I <3 Robots; 05-08-12 at 04:23 PM.
#43
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 23,208
Mentioned: 89 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 18883 Post(s)
Liked 10,646 Times
in
6,054 Posts
#44
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,429
Bikes: 2013 orca
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts