What Back and Front Tooth Ratio is Fastest???
#26
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St Peters, Missouri
Posts: 30,225
Bikes: Catrike 559 I own some others but they don't get ridden very much.
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1572 Post(s)
Liked 643 Times
in
364 Posts
If you put a Ferrari transmission into a Yugo or something similar do you think it would go 150 MPH? Of course not because it doesn't have enough power. Bicycles are the same.
__________________
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
My greatest fear is all of my kids standing around my coffin and talking about "how sensible" dad was.
#27
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
That works for me, but you have to have the ability to apply an awful lot of torque before that is efficient. I suspect the answer for best starting gear combo is going to vary a lot with the rider's capabilities and strengths.
#28
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Zang's Spur, CO
Posts: 9,083
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3376 Post(s)
Liked 5,519 Times
in
2,861 Posts
One day on my usual route, I thought I had a pretty good pace going when I got passed by a little chick spinning an incredible cadence.
As I struggled to keep up, I was curious what her cadence really was, so I downshifted until I matched it.
She was spinning 120rpm, and was still doing that as she cruised away from me!
As I struggled to keep up, I was curious what her cadence really was, so I downshifted until I matched it.
She was spinning 120rpm, and was still doing that as she cruised away from me!
#30
Banned
OP, set your 2 bikes against a wall , step back 5 paces.. wait & watch ,
1st one that moves on its own, must be the fastest ..
1st one that moves on its own, must be the fastest ..
#31
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
One day on my usual route, I thought I had a pretty good pace going when I got passed by a little chick spinning an incredible cadence.
As I struggled to keep up, I was curious what her cadence really was, so I downshifted until I matched it.
She was spinning 120rpm, and was still doing that as she cruised away from me!
As I struggled to keep up, I was curious what her cadence really was, so I downshifted until I matched it.
She was spinning 120rpm, and was still doing that as she cruised away from me!
I'm guessing she wasn't running 52x13, though!
I can't even relate to riding like that.
#32
working on my sandal tan
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: CID
Posts: 22,629
Bikes: 1991 Bianchi Eros, 1964 Armstrong, 1988 Diamondback Ascent, 1988 Bianchi Premio, 1987 Bianchi Sport SX, 1980s Raleigh mixte (hers), All-City Space Horse (hers)
Mentioned: 98 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3871 Post(s)
Liked 2,568 Times
in
1,579 Posts
The beauty and point of gear inches is that the wheel diameter is baked in, so 72 gear inches is the same gearing whether you're on 16" wheels or 27" wheels.
#33
Veteran, Pacifist
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Seattle area
Posts: 13,328
Bikes: Bikes??? Thought this was social media?!?
Mentioned: 284 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3898 Post(s)
Liked 4,836 Times
in
2,229 Posts
Tandem with a good stoker and 54/11 gearing is the closest i’ve come to 40mph on the flats.
#34
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
My wheels with 622mm rims and 28mm tires on are about 27". I run my 32s kinda soft, so they're about 27" effective when I'm on the bike
#35
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 2,190
Bikes: Ti, Mn Cr Ni Mo Nb, Al, C
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 942 Post(s)
Liked 527 Times
in
349 Posts
What's a good back:front tooth ratio and gear stepping system from standstill to top speed on road bikes?
I have seen that some riders are taking road bikes up to 40+ mph. I'm just looking for the 30+ mph range on the road, and I'm not looking for expensive produce or parts. I don't care how old or what it looks like to be honest as long as it stays together, handles, and gets to top speed rapidly.
Some back:front gear ratios are better than others, right? I'm messing with two bikes right now which are just older road bikes that have mountain and cruiser features. They're just fun and project bikes. I noted on the second one I bought yesterday that it was going much faster with very minimal effort compared to what the first one could do without much more effort. The first one is 21spd and the second, faster one is 18spd, however I don't believe the number of sprocks but the number of teeth matters.
I have seen that some riders are taking road bikes up to 40+ mph. I'm just looking for the 30+ mph range on the road, and I'm not looking for expensive produce or parts. I don't care how old or what it looks like to be honest as long as it stays together, handles, and gets to top speed rapidly.
Some back:front gear ratios are better than others, right? I'm messing with two bikes right now which are just older road bikes that have mountain and cruiser features. They're just fun and project bikes. I noted on the second one I bought yesterday that it was going much faster with very minimal effort compared to what the first one could do without much more effort. The first one is 21spd and the second, faster one is 18spd, however I don't believe the number of sprocks but the number of teeth matters.
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,906
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 129 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4806 Post(s)
Liked 3,932 Times
in
2,557 Posts
Yes, but if you are riding normal 700c tires, 27" is plenty accurate enough (unless you are a junior and the race official does a rollout. There it matters. The bike is either legal or it is not.) I use the old 27" for all my 700c tires. But very large tires are slower, so I knock my gearing down, usually a tooth. Very fast (and usually small) tires, I might go up a tooth. It all works out. 27 is a number that allows me to calculate gear ratios in my head. Long rides give me plenty of time to do that.
#37
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
FWIW, I will do drag race intervals during crit season where I'll alternate big (53x16) and small ring sprints (38x15) and try to go 0-30 as quickly as possible. On the big ring, the challenge is at the start to get on top of the gear as quickly as possible. On the small ring, the challenge is at the end to keep my feet moving and the gear engaged before spinning out.
#38
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My suggestion is to look up how gear ratios are calculated for bikes... there are a few different terms, but a common one is "gear inches," which is the number of inches that you move for one complete revolution of the pedals. Also think about "cadence" which is revolutions per minute of your pedals. There are online calculators that will work these things out for you, along with things like the speed that you can ride for a particular gear combination at a particular cadence.
This is practically pure math, which scares some people, but is not really all that difficult. There's no absolute answer because each rider has their own preferred cadence and top speed. For instance for myself, 30+ mph is unattainable due to wind resistance and my own strength, so I have no use for gearing that can reach that speed.
This is practically pure math, which scares some people, but is not really all that difficult. There's no absolute answer because each rider has their own preferred cadence and top speed. For instance for myself, 30+ mph is unattainable due to wind resistance and my own strength, so I have no use for gearing that can reach that speed.
I'm in shape.
How about wheel size in the ratio of gears? Does that make a difference? And thin tires probably put on a little more speed and acceleration than the average mtb width, eh.
#39
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Okay, but what about the human power involved. To take this to an extreme example, say the tires were four feet across in dia. Yeap, the gearing is the same, however turning the wheel for the person is not. I wonder anybody with experience with the higher diameter wheels has any antidotes to explain.
#40
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
If you're running sewups, Dugast has 18mm tires.
There used to be 18mm clinchers all over the place, and I think someone still makes 'em, can't think of who, though.
#41
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
So 2x or 2.5 minute miles is okay with acceleration that is comparable to cars at take off at the stop lights/signs. The main thing is to keep up the pace with traffic on the long mains. I have been riding the ole mountain bikes mostly for style preferences. That's just what I always rode. Whatever. LOL But in this case I need a bike that can pace it with traffic who's going about 35-45 mph.
#42
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,893
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1062 Post(s)
Liked 665 Times
in
421 Posts
"Gear Inches" is a useful and widely-accepted measure of mechanical advantage when cycling, but it is not the number of inches travelled during one crank revolution. GI is usually calculated as (crank teeth#/sprocket teeth#)*27", 27" being the nominal diameter of a standard bicycle wheel, so, for example, a 52-13 gear would develop a "108" gear". However, wheel circumference, rather than diameter, determines the wheel rollout, or the distance travelled by one wheel revolution, and circumference is 3.14x greater than diameter. The actual distance travelled (in inches) is 3.14-fold greater than the calculated gear inches. Therefore, in the 108 gear inches example above, the bicycle would travel ~339" (108" x 3.14) with one crank revolution.
Everything matters. Tire width is one of those "all other things being equal" things. Rolling resistance of the tires depends on their width, but also on pressure, tire construction, tread pattern, and possibly the surface that you're riding on. But if you go down the "build me the fastest possible bike" rabbit hole, I won't be following you there, because I'm satisfied with riding at a more sedate speed based on my own abilities.
#43
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What's a good thin tire compromise for the above situation: fast and occasional road jags? It only takes one the wrong way one time, and it's a dented rim and probably a rim pinched tube, eh.
#44
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
Okay, but these streets are always smooth, and I'll run it up on the side walk to cut a corner, shave an inche, etc. The sidewalks have wanks and jags, so... This kind of stuff was the reason I like the mtb set ups.
What's a good thin tire compromise for the above situation: fast and occasional road jags? It only takes one the wrong way one time, and it's a dented rim and probably a rim pinched tube, eh.
What's a good thin tire compromise for the above situation: fast and occasional road jags? It only takes one the wrong way one time, and it's a dented rim and probably a rim pinched tube, eh.
#45
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 81
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 58 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
No, I'm just trying to understand some basic science, and then get a formula that I can take to the used market or new for parts and rides now and then.
So I researched the bike seats last night and the angle of body lean and speed increase. I took from Bike Forum people the "what's-what" on gear ratios, wheel dia and width, crank/BB/shell specs, and I have my post clamp bike stand in the mail almost to the house this minute. Hehe.
Just the basics, eh.
#46
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,779
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6844 Post(s)
Liked 736 Times
in
469 Posts
I'm starting urban courier. I have just a few multi mile long flat roads and lots of little left and right turn streets in between that are flat too. That's what I'm working with.
So 2x or 2.5 minute miles is okay with acceleration that is comparable to cars at take off at the stop lights/signs. The main thing is to keep up the pace with traffic on the long mains. I have been riding the ole mountain bikes mostly for style preferences. That's just what I always rode. Whatever. LOL But in this case I need a bike that can pace it with traffic who's going about 35-45 mph.
So 2x or 2.5 minute miles is okay with acceleration that is comparable to cars at take off at the stop lights/signs. The main thing is to keep up the pace with traffic on the long mains. I have been riding the ole mountain bikes mostly for style preferences. That's just what I always rode. Whatever. LOL But in this case I need a bike that can pace it with traffic who's going about 35-45 mph.
-Tim-
#47
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sacramento, California, USA
Posts: 40,865
Bikes: Specialized Tarmac, Canyon Exceed, Specialized Transition, Ellsworth Roots, Ridley Excalibur
Mentioned: 68 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2952 Post(s)
Liked 3,106 Times
in
1,417 Posts
2’/mi = 30mph. 2.5’/mi = 24mph
#48
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
#49
cowboy, steel horse, etc
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: The hot spot.
Posts: 44,851
Bikes: everywhere
Mentioned: 71 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12778 Post(s)
Liked 7,695 Times
in
4,084 Posts
#50
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I suggest some sort of JATO device.
35-45 mph running speed is completely unrealistic. If you can do that, quit your day job. Anything but bicycling is a waste of talent.
35-45 mph running speed is completely unrealistic. If you can do that, quit your day job. Anything but bicycling is a waste of talent.