Weight difference between steel and carbon forks
Likes For Riveting:
#52
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I think so!
This is probably where you can save more weight for less money!!
I always (try to) do it! 😉
#53
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
Were you ever tempted to go with disc brakes up front, v-brakes at the back?
#54
Junior Member
Thread Starter
And, I think is easier to mount/dismount front wheel with V-Brakes than with disc brake (not sure about it), and that is important to me (I need to dismount front wheel to transport my bike in the car).
Anyway, do you think disc brake in the front would be and improvement? Really interested in your opinions!!!
#55
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
I've read that sometimes owners of Surly Long Haul Truckers will replace their fork with the Disc Trucker fork, but this is a very small number of people doing that and their needs are likely very different to yours.
Because you were going to replace a fork you weren't happy with, I was just wondering if you had considered it.
Likes For ColonelSanders:
#56
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,701 Times
in
2,521 Posts
I am rehabilitating a hybrid for my wife. It had a suspension fork which was somewhat questionable after being in a wreck. I decided to stick with rim brakes and not to get a disc fork. Even though the new fork is low-end steel, it's going to save a lot of weight over the suspension fork, which I think weighs more than the frame. This is not the case with high-end suspension forks, which are surprisingly light.
Likes For unterhausen:
#57
Advocatus Diaboli
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Wherever I am
Posts: 8,641
Bikes: Merlin Cyrene, Nashbar steel CX
Mentioned: 14 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4739 Post(s)
Liked 1,533 Times
in
1,004 Posts
Likes For Sy Reene:
#58
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Highlands Ranch, CO
Posts: 1,221
Bikes: '13 Diamondback Hybrid Commuter, '17 Spec Roubaix Di2, '17 Spec Camber 29'er, '19 CDale Topstone Gravel
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 590 Post(s)
Liked 445 Times
in
260 Posts
I personally commute on a very heavy (55+ lbs with panniers loaded with work clothes and lunch) entry-level $450 Diamondback hybrid with steel fork, dynamo, adjustable stem, Schwalbe Marathon tires, and electric front hub wheel, and wouldn't dream of spending $200 (nor any amount of $$$) to reduce its weight by any number of lbs. But I'd spend that $200 in a second to reduce the weight of my full carbon Roubaix by 2 lbs. IN A NEW YORK SECOND!!!
Likes For Riveting:
#59
Junior Member
Thread Starter
BUT, I already had the FX, and this has ben a process... at first I did not think I would go that far, I just swaped cassette and rear derailleur... after that, I realised that I don't need a 2x crankset, so I swapped to GRX 1x (40T)... after that, I thoght that I would ride better with different wheels and.... and so on... hahahaha
And the truth is that I'm "building" the bike that fit perfectly to me... and it is FUN!!!!
#60
Randomhead
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Happy Valley, Pennsylvania
Posts: 24,402
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Liked 3,701 Times
in
2,521 Posts
He saved $800 by buying the fork, but only would have saved $100 by buying the bike. If he could find one right now. Seems like you could finance some more upgrades using this thought process.
Likes For unterhausen:
#61
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2021
Posts: 20
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Hi!
I've a bike with a steel fork (2016 Trek FX 7.1),192.168.100.1 192.168.1.1 and to lower weight I'm thinking of replacing the steel fork with a carbon one (the carbon fork of the Trek FX 7.4, with is 100% compatible).
The problem is that I can't find online the weight of my steel fork, and neither the weight of the carbon fork of the Trek FX 7.4
I have asked trek customer service, but they have not been able to tell me that info.
So the question is:
Let's suppose that the steel fork was of excellent quality, and of low weight to be made of steel, and that the carbon one was not so good and of high weight to be made of carbon (to put us at worst!), do you think that there would still be a noticeable weight difference, that would make the replacement worthwhile?
What do you think? Would be a "low quality" carbon fork, still be way lighter than a "high quality" steel fork?
I've a bike with a steel fork (2016 Trek FX 7.1),192.168.100.1 192.168.1.1 and to lower weight I'm thinking of replacing the steel fork with a carbon one (the carbon fork of the Trek FX 7.4, with is 100% compatible).
The problem is that I can't find online the weight of my steel fork, and neither the weight of the carbon fork of the Trek FX 7.4
I have asked trek customer service, but they have not been able to tell me that info.
So the question is:
Let's suppose that the steel fork was of excellent quality, and of low weight to be made of steel, and that the carbon one was not so good and of high weight to be made of carbon (to put us at worst!), do you think that there would still be a noticeable weight difference, that would make the replacement worthwhile?
What do you think? Would be a "low quality" carbon fork, still be way lighter than a "high quality" steel fork?
Last edited by ganthercage; 10-15-21 at 04:13 AM.
Likes For Siu Blue Wind:
#63
Senior Member
Getting a lighter fork does not preclude going on a diet. All gains (or losses in this case) are cumulative.
Likes For BlazingPedals:
#64
Full Member
For a few of us though, losing weight isn't an option. This is more directed at the original member who made the comment about losing weight, but for somebody like me, losing any more weight off my already slender physique is out of the question. Any weight losses I personally embark on will be in the form of components and equipment.
HOWEVER, if someone has some extra weight they'd like to lose, more power to 'em.
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15,496
Bikes: 2015 Workswell 066, 2017 Workswell 093, 2014 Dawes Sheila, 1983 Cannondale 500, 1984 Raleigh Olympian, 2007 Cannondale Rize 4, 2017 Fuji Sportif 1 LE
Mentioned: 144 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7653 Post(s)
Liked 3,485 Times
in
1,840 Posts
Y'all can certainly be .... well, never mind.
There is Zero connection between building a light bike and losing weight. That would be like saying no one could buy a Corvette or Camaro unless they drove at a certain (illegal) rate of speed to "justify" the added performance capacity.
People like light bikes because they are light. Fat people, skinny people, fast riders, slow riders .... a light bike is light for all of them.
And people like to lighten their bikes because they want ... lighter bikes. (Stop me if I am going too fast here and I will explain in more detail.)
This guy never intended to have a lighter bike. He got the right bike for him at the time. As time has passed, he has incrementally upgraded and improved his bike, to the point that it is now (for the class of bike, material, etc,) a "light" bike. Bravo! He has built the bike he wants.
Maybe he didn't care about weight when he bought the bike. Maybe he couldn't afford the lighter version, or maybe he couldn't justify spending more for the lighter version back then because he didn't intend to ride enough to make the upgrades make a difference. Maybe he just liked the color of this particular bike. What does it matter?
The OP has changed over time, his cycling habits and his preferences have changed, and he has over time, built exactly the bike he wants.
And people still have to crap on him for it ... because some people cannot manage their own lives and need to take that out on others.
Seems to me the guy has been slowly and steadily improving his bike and now has it just where he wants it. I say he merits congratulations.
At the start of this thread, before he told his story, I advised him not to put any money into this bike, but to buy a better base model. Then he explained that he had already upgraded pretty much every part of the bike, and all that stood between him and owning his home-made version of the top-tier model, was the fork. So he got the fork.
Good for him .... because what really matters? That he saved every penny? In that case, don buy a bike. That he bought a bike back then that he didn't want then, in case he wanted it later? Then wouldn't he needed to have bought half-a-dozen bikes, just in case?
How about, what matters is, all along the way this guy has had a bike he really likes and likes to ride, and now he has almost perfected it?
Yeah .... that seems to make sense.
Anyone who cannot see the sense there .... well, it is BF so I am not surprised.
There is Zero connection between building a light bike and losing weight. That would be like saying no one could buy a Corvette or Camaro unless they drove at a certain (illegal) rate of speed to "justify" the added performance capacity.
People like light bikes because they are light. Fat people, skinny people, fast riders, slow riders .... a light bike is light for all of them.
And people like to lighten their bikes because they want ... lighter bikes. (Stop me if I am going too fast here and I will explain in more detail.)
This guy never intended to have a lighter bike. He got the right bike for him at the time. As time has passed, he has incrementally upgraded and improved his bike, to the point that it is now (for the class of bike, material, etc,) a "light" bike. Bravo! He has built the bike he wants.
Maybe he didn't care about weight when he bought the bike. Maybe he couldn't afford the lighter version, or maybe he couldn't justify spending more for the lighter version back then because he didn't intend to ride enough to make the upgrades make a difference. Maybe he just liked the color of this particular bike. What does it matter?
The OP has changed over time, his cycling habits and his preferences have changed, and he has over time, built exactly the bike he wants.
And people still have to crap on him for it ... because some people cannot manage their own lives and need to take that out on others.
Seems to me the guy has been slowly and steadily improving his bike and now has it just where he wants it. I say he merits congratulations.
At the start of this thread, before he told his story, I advised him not to put any money into this bike, but to buy a better base model. Then he explained that he had already upgraded pretty much every part of the bike, and all that stood between him and owning his home-made version of the top-tier model, was the fork. So he got the fork.
Good for him .... because what really matters? That he saved every penny? In that case, don buy a bike. That he bought a bike back then that he didn't want then, in case he wanted it later? Then wouldn't he needed to have bought half-a-dozen bikes, just in case?
How about, what matters is, all along the way this guy has had a bike he really likes and likes to ride, and now he has almost perfected it?
Yeah .... that seems to make sense.
Anyone who cannot see the sense there .... well, it is BF so I am not surprised.
Likes For Maelochs:
#66
Junior Member
Thread Starter
My "beloved but ancient" TREK FX 7.1 after all the "surgery"... finally!
Yes, it isn't fancy, is old, and probably I would have spend less money buying a new bike... but I like it!
(and now is also light, comfy and "faster enough")
What's new?
Saddle (Bontrager)
Seatpost (carbon, 180g)
Wheels (Mavic Ksyrium S)
Tires (Pirelli Cinturato Velo tubeless 700x28c)
Crankset (Shimano GRX 1x (40T))
Cassette (Shimano 105 11v 11-32)
Rear derrailleur (Shimano 105 11v)
Right sifter (Shimano SL-RS700 11v)
Bottom bracket (Shimano XT)
Chain (Shimano "Supernarrow")
Fork (Trek carbon, 616g)
Yes, it isn't fancy, is old, and probably I would have spend less money buying a new bike... but I like it!
(and now is also light, comfy and "faster enough")
What's new?
Saddle (Bontrager)
Seatpost (carbon, 180g)
Wheels (Mavic Ksyrium S)
Tires (Pirelli Cinturato Velo tubeless 700x28c)
Crankset (Shimano GRX 1x (40T))
Cassette (Shimano 105 11v 11-32)
Rear derrailleur (Shimano 105 11v)
Right sifter (Shimano SL-RS700 11v)
Bottom bracket (Shimano XT)
Chain (Shimano "Supernarrow")
Fork (Trek carbon, 616g)
Last edited by JBerto; 10-22-21 at 05:23 PM.
Likes For JBerto:
#67
Newbie
Nice!
I plan to start a project soon and will probably go the same route. Buy a bike and upgrade it overtime to what I want
I plan to start a project soon and will probably go the same route. Buy a bike and upgrade it overtime to what I want
Likes For tangent70:
#68
Drip, Drip.
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 1,575
Bikes: Trek Verve E bike, Felt Doctrine 4 XC, Opus Horizon Apex 1
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1034 Post(s)
Liked 193 Times
in
163 Posts
Maybe it wasn't a bad idea to do this upgrade, as long as you are happy with it. I recently sold my trek fx 7.3 which I had fitted with 190mm crank arms. It was a beast for being only entry level.
Are you sure the ATC on that fork is same as original? It looks a bit long. Do you know what offset the new fork has and how an increase (or decrease) would affect handling? I believe stock is 45.
Are you sure the ATC on that fork is same as original? It looks a bit long. Do you know what offset the new fork has and how an increase (or decrease) would affect handling? I believe stock is 45.
#69
Sunshine
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 16,618
Bikes: '18 class built steel roadbike, '19 Fairlight Secan, '88 Schwinn Premis , Black Mountain Cycles Monstercross V4, '89 Novara Trionfo
Mentioned: 123 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10971 Post(s)
Liked 7,498 Times
in
4,194 Posts
#70
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Maybe it wasn't a bad idea to do this upgrade, as long as you are happy with it. I recently sold my trek fx 7.3 which I had fitted with 190mm crank arms. It was a beast for being only entry level.
Are you sure the ATC on that fork is same as original? It looks a bit long. Do you know what offset the new fork has and how an increase (or decrease) would affect handling? I believe stock is 45.
Are you sure the ATC on that fork is same as original? It looks a bit long. Do you know what offset the new fork has and how an increase (or decrease) would affect handling? I believe stock is 45.
#71
Junior Member
Thread Starter
#72
Advanced Slacker
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,210
Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2762 Post(s)
Liked 2,537 Times
in
1,433 Posts
Here is another apples-to-apple comparison of lower end steel vs CF forks:
I have in my possession two Some Fog Cutter (V1) forks with steerers cut to identical lengths:
I have in my possession two Some Fog Cutter (V1) forks with steerers cut to identical lengths:
- CF:760g
- Steel:1,038g
Last edited by Kapusta; 10-26-21 at 01:26 PM.
Likes For Kapusta:
#73
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
I replaced the broom handle, then I replaced the worn-out bristles .... twice, then four more times ... then I had to replace the handle again a couple times ..... that old broom has been around forever.
Pretty much I'd say the bike's identity goes with the frame. Once you replace the frame .... I mean, if all you kept was the seat-post clamp binder bolt from the C'dale and Everything else came from somewhere else .... would it still be the same Cannondale?
if you used one part of the old C'dale on 17 different bikes, would they All be the same old Cannondale?
Pretty much I'd say the bike's identity goes with the frame. Once you replace the frame .... I mean, if all you kept was the seat-post clamp binder bolt from the C'dale and Everything else came from somewhere else .... would it still be the same Cannondale?
if you used one part of the old C'dale on 17 different bikes, would they All be the same old Cannondale?
It's never the same river, right?
Such a zen question.
#74
Tragically Ignorant
Join Date: Jun 2018
Location: New England
Posts: 15,613
Bikes: Serotta Atlanta; 1994 Specialized Allez Pro; Giant OCR A1; SOMA Double Cross Disc; 2022 Allez Elite mit der SRAM
Mentioned: 62 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 8186 Post(s)
Liked 9,098 Times
in
5,054 Posts
Agreed. Everyone can do as much or little as they please to affect weight and performance.
For a few of us though, losing weight isn't an option. This is more directed at the original member who made the comment about losing weight, but for somebody like me, losing any more weight off my already slender physique is out of the question. Any weight losses I personally embark on will be in the form of components and equipment.
HOWEVER, if someone has some extra weight they'd like to lose, more power to 'em.
For a few of us though, losing weight isn't an option. This is more directed at the original member who made the comment about losing weight, but for somebody like me, losing any more weight off my already slender physique is out of the question. Any weight losses I personally embark on will be in the form of components and equipment.
HOWEVER, if someone has some extra weight they'd like to lose, more power to 'em.
Cut off a limb!
Kidding.
I'm not a weight wienie, but why should anyone who is care about my opinion on the subject? You shouldn't care about this because... is never useful advice unless someone has asked "should I care about this?"
#75
Full Member
Likes For Pantah: