Power meters for track
#26
Senior Member
She had never used it before that day? You may need to connect to do the initial setup, but not sure if that'd prevent it from working (all the ones I've ever installed we just did the setup at that time)
You need the app to calibrate (which is possibly just as/more important than the recording itself) but it should pair with a head unit like any other ant+ device.
I've definitely seen DLV track center filled with people staring at their phones
You need the app to calibrate (which is possibly just as/more important than the recording itself) but it should pair with a head unit like any other ant+ device.
I've definitely seen DLV track center filled with people staring at their phones
#27
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
She had never used it before that day? You may need to connect to do the initial setup, but not sure if that'd prevent it from working (all the ones I've ever installed we just did the setup at that time)
You need the app to calibrate (which is possibly just as/more important than the recording itself) but it should pair with a head unit like any other ant+ device.
I've definitely seen DLV track center filled with people staring at their phones
You need the app to calibrate (which is possibly just as/more important than the recording itself) but it should pair with a head unit like any other ant+ device.
I've definitely seen DLV track center filled with people staring at their phones
I was helping her and I also couldn't get it to work.
#28
Senior Member
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Stages does (did?) have issues with signal at distance from the unit, also on the older ones the back of the battery lid didn't always make a solid connection and let the coin battery move. Mine wouldn't pick up my ANT stick in my computer ~5ft away, but reads it fine sitting underneath the trainer (less than a ft) although it always paired to my head unit (~2ft) fine. Some folk I installed for reported the same at short'ish distances (almost exclusively gen1 devices though)
With the cell service I've gotten every time I've been at DLV I could see it being an issue connecting everything.
With the cell service I've gotten every time I've been at DLV I could see it being an issue connecting everything.
#29
Senior Member
Possible that the cell service at DLV (mine is never great) could have been the root cause, I think the stages app works offline however. (not sure) If not, that's a big oversight.
Stages did (does?) have some issues with the battery door causing dropouts, and also some issues with distance from head unit to the PM. I believe those were mainly issues with gen1 models.
I've set up a fair number of them, and they are on the verge of plug and play. The distance from ANT+ device to PM was the primary complaint I've heard.
(Speaking of technical issues that are possibly user error, my original reply had to be moderated? That's a first.)
Stages did (does?) have some issues with the battery door causing dropouts, and also some issues with distance from head unit to the PM. I believe those were mainly issues with gen1 models.
I've set up a fair number of them, and they are on the verge of plug and play. The distance from ANT+ device to PM was the primary complaint I've heard.
(Speaking of technical issues that are possibly user error, my original reply had to be moderated? That's a first.)
#30
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Symmetry is raised in the discussion not as important for power generation, rather for power measurement when measuring only one side and averaging. Especially when testing has shown that the balance can fluctuate depending on your level of effort.
Years ago, there were reports of a dual sided unit under development at Stages. Can you elaborate why this wasn't followed through to market (I haven't looked at the product recently, so apologies if it has been since released).
PS full disclosure - I am an SRM fanboy and own numerous units both wired and wireless across my bikes including two track units. All bought second hand and all but one still going strong!
Years ago, there were reports of a dual sided unit under development at Stages. Can you elaborate why this wasn't followed through to market (I haven't looked at the product recently, so apologies if it has been since released).
PS full disclosure - I am an SRM fanboy and own numerous units both wired and wireless across my bikes including two track units. All bought second hand and all but one still going strong!
https://store.stagescycling.com/STAGES-POWER-LR-ULTEGRA-R8000-CRANKSET-WITH-BI-LATERAL-DUAL-POWER-METER
The market gets what the market demands! We're still not sure what benefits having the balance metric gives, aside from reference for each individual.
#31
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 606
Bikes: Trek Madone, Blue Triad SL, Dixie Flyer BTB
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 160 Post(s)
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think you're ignoring the fact that this "entire segment of the population" is pretty tiny. If it made financial sense to bring to market all this track-specific gear, companies would be doing it.
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 114
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
@carelton - With regards to the elite at DLV that couldn't set her Stages up: there isn't set up. Bolt it on, pair it to the Garmin, and pedal until you vomit. I realize that doesn't help now, but on the off chance, all you need to do is pair and ride.
@Morelock - Our app works offline for calibration and viewing tools. You need WiFi for firmware updates. Our battery door issues have been solved with the Gen 2 housing from 2015 onward.Thankfully!
#33
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 275
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 194 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
I don't think that we actually use L/R information for anything...at all. Am I wrong?
We can measure which leg is stronger just fine in the gym and use that to 'correct' any imbalance issues (but we mostly don't really worry about that). So single-sided isn't really an issue, I don't think. What matters is that the powermeter is consistent with itself: if you're 'really' putting out 1600 vs 1700w doesn't much matter per se (due to averaging the left if one's left is weaker vs stronger than one's right).
We can measure which leg is stronger just fine in the gym and use that to 'correct' any imbalance issues (but we mostly don't really worry about that). So single-sided isn't really an issue, I don't think. What matters is that the powermeter is consistent with itself: if you're 'really' putting out 1600 vs 1700w doesn't much matter per se (due to averaging the left if one's left is weaker vs stronger than one's right).
#34
Perceptual Dullard
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,456
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 938 Post(s)
Liked 1,199 Times
in
515 Posts
Hmmm. I'm surprised that any serious track racer, either sprint or endurance, would think that any PM that uses accelerometers for cadence (and that includes all pedal-based systems, and PMs like the Stages). Every accelerometer-based PM for which I've analyzed data shows a lag in recording power or cadence or both for standing starts, for low-cadence (which is usually when you have the highest crank torque), and for sudden changes in cadence. You can see that when you analyze the ratio of reported speed to reported cadence. The ratio of reported speed to reported cadence for PMs like the SRM (which uses an old-fashioned reed switch for cadence) when paired with an old-fashioned reed switch speed sensor is much more stable. (I think a corollary is that the new-fangled accelerometer-based speed sensors may also be subject to this, but I haven't seen much data from a bike with a reed switch cadence sensor and an accelerometer speed sensor so I'm not yet sure).
I've worked with a few pursuit racers on their aerodynamic and rolling drag. That's an application where you really do need accuracy across the entire range of speeds and powers that you race at. I've had excellent luck with analyzing data from SRMs; I've had terrible luck with analyzing data from two riders who used Stages. Now when someone asks me for help with measuring their drag, I tell them I can't help them if they used a Stages to collect their data.
I've worked with a few pursuit racers on their aerodynamic and rolling drag. That's an application where you really do need accuracy across the entire range of speeds and powers that you race at. I've had excellent luck with analyzing data from SRMs; I've had terrible luck with analyzing data from two riders who used Stages. Now when someone asks me for help with measuring their drag, I tell them I can't help them if they used a Stages to collect their data.
#35
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
For those not familiar with Mr. (Dr.?) Chung’s work: https://anonymous.coward.free.fr/watt...direct-cda.pdf
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
I've even had conversations with engineers at Wahoo Fitness (coincidentally based here in Atlanta) about their Kicker trainer. With some small adaptations, they could have easily added the ability to, by design, mount track bikes as well.
Nope. Not gonna happen.
Same for CycleOps. I've talked to engineers there, too. ONE small change could open up their spin bikes to elite trackies and compete with the Watt Bike.
Nope.
I know that the bike industry is competitive. But, straight up ignoring this entire segment of the population is nuts.
Nope. Not gonna happen.
Same for CycleOps. I've talked to engineers there, too. ONE small change could open up their spin bikes to elite trackies and compete with the Watt Bike.
Nope.
I know that the bike industry is competitive. But, straight up ignoring this entire segment of the population is nuts.
#39
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
I've done it 3 times including one sitting in my home right now. I bought a gently used CycleOps spin bike for $400 off of craigslist. Had some bits modified. Now it rivals any $3,000 WattBike and will handle +2,000W standing starts and any other workout you can give it...and I can put Scattos or my aerobars of choice on it. It has a 31.8mm stem
The mod that I made can be done with any CycleOps spin bike, from the very old to the brand new.
#40
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
I'm referring to their high-end spin bikes. It's possible to modify these to accept any sprint or aero bars and be fixed gear using parts that they already fabricate in-house. No major retooling needed.
I've done it 3 times including one sitting in my home right now. I bought a gently used CycleOps spin bike for $400 off of craigslist. Had some bits modified. Now it rivals any $3,000 WattBike and will handle +2,000W standing starts and any other workout you can give it...and I can put Scattos or my aerobars of choice on it. It has a 31.8mm stem
The mod that I made can be done with any CycleOps spin bike, from the very old to the brand new.
I've done it 3 times including one sitting in my home right now. I bought a gently used CycleOps spin bike for $400 off of craigslist. Had some bits modified. Now it rivals any $3,000 WattBike and will handle +2,000W standing starts and any other workout you can give it...and I can put Scattos or my aerobars of choice on it. It has a 31.8mm stem
The mod that I made can be done with any CycleOps spin bike, from the very old to the brand new.
#41
Senior Member
#44
Senior Member
Maybe I'll snag the next one (and find room for it somewhere)
#45
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
The mods are a bonus.
EDIT: If you happen to buy one with a free hub, you can order a fixed hub conversion kit from CycleOps for a few bucks.
The crank arms are 170mm. I think the BB is FSA splined (I can't recall the name for this system). So, if you are adventurous, you can even change out the cranks to the length of choice. The chain is a 3/32 road chain that should be replaced with a strong single speed chain before doing crazy hard efforts. +1800W on an old road chain is scary.
EDIT 2: If you replace the chain, buy 2 and combine them. A standard chain won't be long enough to travel the circuit from chainring to cog and back. I think the wheelbase (from BB to rear hub) is longer than a normal bike.
Last edited by carleton; 08-14-18 at 09:28 AM.
#47
Elitist
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Mentioned: 88 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1386 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times
in
77 Posts
@carleton your faith in my sprint is both appreciated and comical
Check out this thread I made on the topic: My $400 "WattBike" (CycleOps Indoor Cycle)
#48
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 2,433
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 741 Post(s)
Liked 412 Times
in
230 Posts
Check this out. Start saving your pennies.
https://powermetercity.com/product/v...k-power-meter/
https://powermetercity.com/product/v...k-power-meter/
#50
Senior Member
I do appreciate that infocrank offers shorter crank lengths... never seen one in the wild though.
Been thinking of picking up a cheapo quarq or p2m and trying the bdop 110-144 converter. Not that I need another pm...
Been thinking of picking up a cheapo quarq or p2m and trying the bdop 110-144 converter. Not that I need another pm...