Trek DS 2 vs DS 3
#1
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Trek DS 2 vs DS 3
Looking at getting one of these bikes soon for fitness purposes.
How do they compare overall?
Is the DS 3 a big enough step up over the DS 2 to justify the the price increase?
How do they compare overall?
Is the DS 3 a big enough step up over the DS 2 to justify the the price increase?
Last edited by Klaista2k; 06-12-17 at 11:14 PM.
#2
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I bought my wife a verve 3 and I can't tell the difference in my verve 2. I was looking at ds2 for my son. I doubt I can tell the $200 different between ds2 vs3.
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
Unless you prefer the colour scheme of the Trek DS's, you would be better off looking at the Giant Roam 2 or 1.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,142
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
571 Posts
I think I would prefer the DS 2 myself. The DS 3 is another $200 to get a 9-speed drivetrain and Shimano hydraulic disc brakes vs. Tektro hydraulic disc brakes. The DS 2 comes with an 8-speed drivetrain; chains are the same as 6- and 7-speed systems and they're less expensive than 9-speed chains. You likely will never notice the difference in the number of rear cogs -- not for 200 dollars, anyway.
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 204
Bikes: 2017 Trek DS 4, 2014 Niner RLT 9 [storage], K2 Shadow 9 [indoor trainer]
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 77 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
If you're looking at price point I would say the DS 2 is fine. But if you wanted a bit more I would take a serious look at the Giant Roam 1.
#6
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 13 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,207
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times
in
236 Posts
$300, if you're talking about the Escape 1.
Roam has 10-speed Deore vs a mish-mash of parts Altus/Alivio/Acera on the Escape 1. Roam has suspension fork and wider tires, presumably better for going off-road,
Roam 1 is better equipped and cheaper than DS 3, as others have already mentioned.
Roam has 10-speed Deore vs a mish-mash of parts Altus/Alivio/Acera on the Escape 1. Roam has suspension fork and wider tires, presumably better for going off-road,
Roam 1 is better equipped and cheaper than DS 3, as others have already mentioned.
#8
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What would you suggest between the DS 2 and DS 3? I wouldn't mind paying the extra money if the upgrades are worth it.
Last edited by Klaista2k; 06-13-17 at 01:43 PM.
#9
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think I would prefer the DS 2 myself. The DS 3 is another $200 to get a 9-speed drivetrain and Shimano hydraulic disc brakes vs. Tektro hydraulic disc brakes. The DS 2 comes with an 8-speed drivetrain; chains are the same as 6- and 7-speed systems and they're less expensive than 9-speed chains. You likely will never notice the difference in the number of rear cogs -- not for 200 dollars, anyway.
Will the DS 3 be better for climbing with the extra gear?
Last edited by Klaista2k; 06-13-17 at 01:43 PM.
#10
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I also might look into getting a model from last year. Like the DS 8.4
Anyone know if those are still available or would they be out of stock?
Anyone know if those are still available or would they be out of stock?
#12
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 6,207
Bikes: ...a few.
Mentioned: 47 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2012 Post(s)
Liked 410 Times
in
236 Posts
Assuming it has the same chainring numbers the 11-34 will give you a lower climbing gear. But the cassette can changed easily. Eight speed cassettes are cheaper than nine-speed as well.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,142
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
571 Posts
The DS 3 will certainly give you a lower climbing gear. The small chainring on the DS 3 is a 26 and the largest cog on the cassette is a 34. There are about a million and one ways to express "gear ratio" on a bike, but a very basic one is to divide the cassette by the chainring -- or 34/26. In this case, that number is 1.31.
The DS 2's smallest chainring is a 28, and the largest cog on the cassette is a 32. The lowest "gear ratio" on the DS 2 is 1.14. As with cars and trucks, a higher number means a "shorter" gear ratio, or one that multiplies the input torque the most. Pedaling is easiest and the speed is slowest. The DS 3 offers you a 15% easier climbing gear.
(We can directly compare the two bikes because they use the same tire diameter. If you're trying to compare effective gear ratios on bikes with different tire diameters, there are formulas that account for that.)
This is a good point -- I overlooked the difference in the chainrings. If you live where there are hills, the DS 3 would be an easier bike with which to climb.
The DS 2's smallest chainring is a 28, and the largest cog on the cassette is a 32. The lowest "gear ratio" on the DS 2 is 1.14. As with cars and trucks, a higher number means a "shorter" gear ratio, or one that multiplies the input torque the most. Pedaling is easiest and the speed is slowest. The DS 3 offers you a 15% easier climbing gear.
(We can directly compare the two bikes because they use the same tire diameter. If you're trying to compare effective gear ratios on bikes with different tire diameters, there are formulas that account for that.)
This is a good point -- I overlooked the difference in the chainrings. If you live where there are hills, the DS 3 would be an easier bike with which to climb.
#15
Banned.
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Vegemite Island
Posts: 4,130
Bikes: 2017 Surly Troll with XT Drive Train, 2017 Merida Big Nine XT Edition, 2016 Giant Toughroad SLR 2, 1995 Trek 830
Mentioned: 29 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1916 Post(s)
Liked 312 Times
in
220 Posts
I know it costs more, but the only DS model I would consider is the DS4.
Save up the money, wait an extra month if you have to, but that is so much more bike than the DS 2 or 3.
It has literally better everything other than the frame and is almost 3lbs lighter than the DS3
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Martinsburg WV Area
Posts: 1,704
Bikes: State 4130 Custom, Giant Trance 29
Mentioned: 7 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 422 Post(s)
Liked 183 Times
in
123 Posts
Can't tell where you live, but if you happen to be near MD, check out this deal:
Trek 8.4 DS - All American Bicycle Center - Damascus, MD
Trek 8.4 DS - All American Bicycle Center - Damascus, MD
#18
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If by chance I'm able to find a DS 8.4 what color do you guys prefer?
The matte black or viper red?
I like both so it's tough!
The matte black or viper red?
I like both so it's tough!
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,142
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
571 Posts
I prefer glossy paint vs. matte, only because I think gloss paint is easier to keep clean. Matte tends to hang on to dirt in my experience. Is the Viper Red a gloss or a matte finish?
#21
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Northern Shenandoah Valley
Posts: 4,142
Bikes: More bikes than riders
Mentioned: 36 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1446 Post(s)
Liked 763 Times
in
571 Posts
So, because you asked for opinions, I'd get the red. I'm generally not much for black in general, and certainly not a matte black. Personal preference, of course.
#23
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 25
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 6,319
Bikes: 2012 Salsa Casseroll, 2009 Kona Blast
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 208 Times
in
146 Posts
9 speed cassettes are pretty cheap as well. The difference between 8 and 9 speed is small. Certainly nothing like the price of, say, 11 speed.