Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > General Cycling Discussion
Reload this Page >

For fitness does the bike really matter?

Search
Notices
General Cycling Discussion Have a cycling related question or comment that doesn't fit in one of the other specialty forums? Drop on in and post in here! When possible, please select the forum above that most fits your post!

For fitness does the bike really matter?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-17-22, 11:53 AM
  #26  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times in 1,434 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Did you really not read the first post? He's asking about riding different bikes at the same effort for the same amount of time (30 minutes).
I am beginning to wonder if we are all reading the same OP
Kapusta is offline  
Likes For Kapusta:
Old 02-17-22, 11:55 AM
  #27  
Mother Nature's Son
 
delbiker1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Sussex County, Delaware
Posts: 3,130

Bikes: 2014 Orbea Avant MD30, 2004 Airborne Zeppelin TI, 2003 Lemond Poprad, 2001 Lemond Tourmalet, 2014? Soma Smoothie

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 856 Post(s)
Liked 1,451 Times in 825 Posts
It matters to me, that's all that matters.
delbiker1 is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 12:07 PM
  #28  
Senior Member
 
WhyFi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: TC, MN
Posts: 39,520

Bikes: R3 Disc, Haanjo

Mentioned: 354 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20810 Post(s)
Liked 9,456 Times in 4,672 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Did you really not read the first post? He's asking about riding different bikes at the same effort for the same amount of time (30 minutes).
Sure, but how else is he going to MAMILsplain?
WhyFi is offline  
Likes For WhyFi:
Old 02-17-22, 12:24 PM
  #29  
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,156

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10518 Post(s)
Liked 12,078 Times in 6,185 Posts
Originally Posted by Virtus
I've been mulling over this question for a while and curious what others think. From a fitness perspective is there really any benefit to riding a lighter/faster bike? Given the below 4 hypothetical scenarios; if they were all completed over the same road, with the same average HR and perceived effort is there any fitness benefit of one over the other?

1. Full suspension mountain bike - 30min ride averaging 12mph (6mi ride)
2. Flat bar fitness/hybrid bike - 30min ride averaging 15mph (7.5mi)
3. Endurance/gravel bike - 30min ride averaging 17mph (8.5mi)
4. Aero road bike - 30min ride averaging 20mph (10mi)
Or 5. Bike on trainer, 30 minutes riding at the same average power as 1-4. As far as fitness, it's all the same, you just turn around and head home at different points.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Likes For genejockey:
Old 02-17-22, 12:28 PM
  #30  
Senior Member
 
Trakhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 5,516
Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2558 Post(s)
Liked 3,056 Times in 1,743 Posts
Reminds me of a contentious thread last year (the topic was something like "Do heavier bikes give you a better workout?") where one poster couldn't understand why the rest of us couldn't understand that heavier bikes do indeed make for a better workout. Every time he was backed into a corner, he shifted the goalposts a bit.

He eventually had to hissy-fit his way out, since the essential question was (as in the present thread) "If you do the same amount of work for the same duration, do you do the same amount of work?"
Trakhak is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 12:33 PM
  #31  
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,156

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10518 Post(s)
Liked 12,078 Times in 6,185 Posts
Originally Posted by rumrunn6
fwiw - I've read that you burn the same # of calories whether you walk or run a mile. it's just that running, takes less time
Apparently that's not the case.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Likes For genejockey:
Old 02-17-22, 12:41 PM
  #32  
Klaatu..Verata..Necktie?
 
genejockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 18,156

Bikes: Litespeed Ultimate, Ultegra; Canyon Endurace, 105; Battaglin MAX, Chorus; Bianchi 928 Veloce; Ritchey Road Logic, Dura Ace; Cannondale R500 RX100; Schwinn Circuit, Sante; Lotus Supreme, Dura Ace

Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 10518 Post(s)
Liked 12,078 Times in 6,185 Posts
Originally Posted by Trakhak
Reminds me of a contentious thread last year (the topic was something like "Do heavier bikes give you a better workout?") where one poster couldn't understand why the rest of us couldn't understand that heavier bikes do indeed make for a better workout. Every time he was backed into a corner, he shifted the goalposts a bit.

He eventually had to hissy-fit his way out, since the essential question was (as in the present thread) "If you do the same amount of work for the same duration, do you do the same amount of work?"
That was my thought on what the thread would be about when I read the title.
__________________
"Don't take life so serious-it ain't nohow permanent."

"Everybody's gotta be somewhere." - Eccles
genejockey is online now  
Likes For genejockey:
Old 02-17-22, 12:41 PM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
zandoval's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bastrop Texas
Posts: 4,539

Bikes: Univega, Peu P6, Peu PR-10, Ted Williams, Peu UO-8, Peu UO-18 Mixte, Peu Dolomites

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 996 Post(s)
Liked 1,666 Times in 1,069 Posts
Originally Posted by Virtus
...is there really any benefit to riding a lighter/faster bike?
I guess not really. For me its comfort. Not really comfort per say as in a soft seat and padded bars but rather comfort in ridding position, posture, and feel of the wheels. Having been a Road Bike guy for most of my ridding experience I gravitate now in my older age to Road Bike frames set up with heaver duty components to ride in gravely conditions. I reluctantly gave up on Drop Bars but still use Bull Horns. For someone who has ridden mostly Moutian Bikes they would probably feel more comfortable with Straight Bars and low center of gravity type bikes. It's kinda hard to explain but feeling comfortable on your bike is a big deal and I am not talking about the Saddle.
__________________
No matter where you're at... There you are... Δf:=f(1/2)-f(-1/2)
zandoval is offline  
Likes For zandoval:
Old 02-17-22, 12:42 PM
  #34  
Full Member
 
Outrider1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 408

Bikes: Trek Emonda ALR 5

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 159 Post(s)
Liked 302 Times in 140 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Same effort, same power output, same amount of time = effectively same amount of overall exercise. Distance traveled will vary depending on the bike. Given the simple and well-defined hypothetical question, the answer is really quite simple.

All the other nonsense going on in this thread is some combination of
  1. lack of reading comprehension
  2. obsessing over the details of a hypothetical example that is not actually germane to answering the OPs root question
  3. confusion about how to apply physics terms to a real world question
  4. just the desire to argue on BF.
I suspect #4 most strongly.
Right! If an individual would like to ride 30 minutes for fitness/exercise, any decently functioning bike would provide the workout.
Outrider1 is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 12:45 PM
  #35  
Senior Member
 
badger1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Southwestern Ontario
Posts: 5,141
Mentioned: 22 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1586 Post(s)
Liked 1,218 Times in 617 Posts
Originally Posted by Kapusta
Same effort, same power output, same amount of time = effectively same amount of overall exercise. Distance traveled will vary depending on the bike. Given the simple and well-defined hypothetical question, the answer is really quite simple.

All the other nonsense going on in this thread is some combination of
  1. lack of reading comprehension
  2. obsessing over the details of a hypothetical example that is not actually germane to answering the OPs root question
  3. confusion about how to apply physics terms to a real world question
  4. just the desire to argue on BF.
I suspect #4 most strongly.
qft
badger1 is offline  
Likes For badger1:
Old 02-17-22, 01:00 PM
  #36  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: socal
Posts: 4,297
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 890 Post(s)
Liked 841 Times in 635 Posts
Doesn't matter to me since I measure rides by smiles, not miles.
2old is offline  
Likes For 2old:
Old 02-17-22, 01:02 PM
  #37  
Newbie racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Posts: 3,406

Bikes: Propel, red is faster

Mentioned: 34 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1575 Post(s)
Liked 1,569 Times in 974 Posts
Whichever combo fits your budget and maximizes the time you want to spend on the bike acquiring fitness. Sure, a $200 Walmart bike can help accrue fitness. But you will likely hate the bike and not want to ride it much.

If you buy a pro road race bike and can't handle the aggressive fit, might not want to ride that much either.

Also need a bike that fits your terrain. Having a bad mismatch on your local riding terrain to the bike you have will make you not want to ride it as much.

But otherwise, this is the troll topic about "I can get more fit on a heavier bike" and "put a car battery on my bike to make the hills longer" nonsense.
burnthesheep is offline  
Likes For burnthesheep:
Old 02-17-22, 01:07 PM
  #38  
TPL
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 248
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 143 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 90 Times in 64 Posts
Primary concern = is this a bicycle that you will actually ride ? FREQUENTLY = DAILY !

Or will the bicycle take up a rather permanent residence in your garage ?
TPL is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 01:35 PM
  #39  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times in 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by cyccommute
Virtus’ hypothesis is flawed. The problem is that this isn’t a power problem. It’s a work problem. Moving each bike requires the same power (i.e. watts) but the work done…i.e force over distance…results in less distance covered for the same force for the mountain bike. In other words, the mountain bike requires more work to move it.
If I was really bored, I could probably assign some arbitrary Crr, weights, and CdA values to each of his scenarios and make the time and distances work out.

A good way to look at a work out is to look at the work done. One can do the same work on each of the machines.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 01:42 PM
  #40  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 6,034

Bikes: Colnago, Van Dessel, Factor, Cervelo, Ritchey

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3997 Post(s)
Liked 7,482 Times in 3,010 Posts
Originally Posted by GhostRider62
If I was really bored, I could probably assign some arbitrary Crr, weights, and CdA values to each of his scenarios and make the time and distances work out.
Don't forget to include relativistic effects. A lot of cyclist overlook that when they buy an aero bike.
tomato coupe is offline  
Likes For tomato coupe:
Old 02-17-22, 01:46 PM
  #41  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Posts: 478
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 166 Post(s)
Liked 252 Times in 147 Posts
Originally Posted by Virtus
I've been mulling over this question for a while and curious what others think. From a fitness perspective is there really any benefit to riding a lighter/faster bike? Given the below 4 hypothetical scenarios; if they were all completed over the same road, with the same average HR and perceived effort is there any fitness benefit of one over the other?
NO... zone 2 for a half hour is zone 2 for a half hour.
sloppy12 is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 01:49 PM
  #42  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times in 1,314 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Don't forget to include relativistic effects. A lot of cyclist overlook that when they buy an aero bike.
I don't know what that is.

Isn't a Watt a Watt or what?

In truth, my low slung recumbent is much harder to put out a watt than my uprights and an equivalent workout in Joules is much, much harder on the recumbent and has a bigger training effect. But OP's listed bikes are all about the same.
GhostRider62 is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 01:50 PM
  #43  
Cheerfully low end
 
ofajen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2020
Posts: 1,981
Mentioned: 5 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 646 Post(s)
Liked 1,050 Times in 670 Posts
If the effort level is constant throughout and the same, there would not be a fitness difference. Riding fixed gear or single speed would likely be different in that while the average HR and effort might be the same, the level of exertion would likely spike on hills and into headwinds. There would be differences in the impact related both to muscular strength and tone and CV fitness.

Otto
ofajen is online now  
Old 02-17-22, 02:29 PM
  #44  
Advanced Slacker
 
Kapusta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 6,215

Bikes: Soma Fog Cutter, Surly Wednesday, Canfielld Tilt

Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2764 Post(s)
Liked 2,540 Times in 1,434 Posts
Originally Posted by tomato coupe
Don't forget to include relativistic effects. A lot of cyclist overlook that when they buy an aero bike.
Yep. Aero bikes slow down aging.
Kapusta is offline  
Likes For Kapusta:
Old 02-17-22, 02:32 PM
  #45  
Senior Member
 
blacknbluebikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: NJ, USA
Posts: 1,286

Bikes: two blacks, a blue and a white.

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 445 Post(s)
Liked 849 Times in 411 Posts
What if one of the bikes is red?
blacknbluebikes is offline  
Likes For blacknbluebikes:
Old 02-17-22, 02:38 PM
  #46  
Senior Member
 
Flip Flop Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,110

Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times in 322 Posts
It only matters if the bike is a factor on whether you will ride it not. The key to bike fitness (in my opinion) is the regularity of riding. You have to enjoy it. If for whatever reason you do not enjoy your bike, then try to get one that you do enjoy. As you ride more, you will become more aware of the features that you need or don't need

The bottom line is ride

if buying new clothes, or a bike, or a gps, or heart rate monitor get you out the door then they are worth it. You have one body in this life, and as most on here will tell you. Biking does a body good
Flip Flop Rider is offline  
Likes For Flip Flop Rider:
Old 02-17-22, 02:39 PM
  #47  
Senior Member
 
Flip Flop Rider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: South Carolina Upstate
Posts: 2,110

Bikes: 2010 Fuji Absolute 3.0 1994 Trek 850

Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 762 Post(s)
Liked 555 Times in 322 Posts
Originally Posted by blacknbluebikes
What if one of the bikes is red?
that changes things
Flip Flop Rider is offline  
Old 02-17-22, 02:47 PM
  #48  
Senior Member
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26471 Post(s)
Liked 10,425 Times in 7,240 Posts
Two pages in, and nobody has mentioned Lance Armstrong ?




...what kind of world do I live in, any more ? *sigh*
3alarmer is online now  
Likes For 3alarmer:
Old 02-17-22, 02:50 PM
  #49  
Senior Member
 
PeteHski's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2021
Posts: 8,675
Mentioned: 16 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4519 Post(s)
Liked 5,020 Times in 3,100 Posts
Originally Posted by Virtus
I From a fitness perspective is there really any benefit to riding a lighter/faster bike?
No there isn't. But a lighter/faster bike might make it a bit easier to normalise your effort. As an extreme example my mate just bought an e-bike (so a faster bike in this case) to effectively flatten his hilly local terrain so he could do more long steady Z2 rides. A normal road bike would make that pretty much impossible as there are 20% gradients around where he lives. But for general fitness I can train equally as effectively on my mtb as I can on my road bike.
PeteHski is online now  
Old 02-17-22, 02:51 PM
  #50  
Senior Member
 
3alarmer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 22,993

Bikes: old ones

Mentioned: 304 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26471 Post(s)
Liked 10,425 Times in 7,240 Posts
Originally Posted by sloppy12
NO... zone 2 for a half hour is zone 2 for a half hour.

...but, but, but what if I'm doing intervals ? (I know that if I don't reference this as a joke, someone will be all over my ass, like a cheap suit. Because it's February, when people are anxious for Spring.)
3alarmer is online now  
Likes For 3alarmer:


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.