difference between touring and road bike
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
difference between touring and road bike
So I am looking into doing long distances of riding a bike and I like the look of vintage bikes and they appear to be cheaper too. Can anyone explain to me what I should look for in a vintage bike to make it more useful for touring. I read other posts something about touring geometry which is relaxed head tube and seat tube angles. However, I do not know what these things means and would like some guidance and I know that racing bikes are more uncomfortable while touring bikes are the opposite and more stiff but not sure what to look for when looking online at bikes (and knowing if a back rack can be installed etc)?
I was looking at marinoni special from 90s as touring bike, but wasnt sure if its doable
Thanks!
I was looking at marinoni special from 90s as touring bike, but wasnt sure if its doable
Thanks!
Last edited by Frenzen; 03-24-22 at 01:14 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
Check for rack mounting eyelets on the front and rear dropouts--this is one of the easiest ways to see if you can mount racks (although you can often do so on bikes without eyelets). The chainstays will also be longer, with a several-inch gap between the rear tire and the seat tube (on a classis steel racing bike, the distance between rear tire and seat tube might be less than the width of your index finger). Of course, you'll want a triple chainring. Yes, the frame angles will be more relaxed--think 75 degree angles instead of 73. You can check this with an angle gauge, but eventually you will just "see" it.
Likes For smd4:
#3
Banned.
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: PAZ
Posts: 12,294
Mentioned: 255 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2588 Post(s)
Liked 4,824 Times
in
1,709 Posts
The chainstays on a touring frame are also going to be longer, giving more clearance at the seat tube for larger-diameter tires and perhaps fenders. Longer chainstays also provide a longer wheelbase, giving a more stable platform for the extra load.
DD
DD
#4
Junior Member
You may want to start here: The Newbie's Guide To Touring Bikes
Last edited by pfaustus; 03-24-22 at 01:56 PM.
#5
ambulatory senior
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Peoria Il
Posts: 5,998
Bikes: Austro Daimler modified by Gugie! Raleigh Professional and lots of other bikes.
Mentioned: 76 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1956 Post(s)
Liked 3,662 Times
in
1,680 Posts
If you can manage touring with a front rack only I think way more sporty bikes become viable. Pclips will help you on a vintage bike but Blackburn made some tice front racks that used only fender eyelets and brake bolt. I've used this style combined with a large saddle bag. It's now my favorite way to tour.
Crappy pic but this was a super loaded bike that handled fine.
Crappy pic but this was a super loaded bike that handled fine.
Likes For 52telecaster:
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland, CA
Posts: 3,265
Bikes: '82 Univega Competizione, '72 Motobecane Grand Record, '83 Mercian KOM Touring, '85 Univega Alpina Uno, '76 Eisentraut Limited
Mentioned: 57 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1088 Post(s)
Liked 1,205 Times
in
701 Posts
This is a nice concise writeup about bike geometry with comparisons between racing and touring geometry. I am not a frame builder or an expert, but the general ideas presented here jibe with my rudimentary understanding and might help you as you're determining which frame to buy.
https://www.cyclingabout.com/underst...rame-geometry/
Here's a sample of what's on the linked web page:
https://www.cyclingabout.com/underst...rame-geometry/
Here's a sample of what's on the linked web page:
Likes For noobinsf:
#7
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,517
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
You'll also find quality vintage touring bikes tend to hold their value more than road bikes of the same vintage.
Likes For dedhed:
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 1,990
Bikes: ‘87 Marinoni SLX Sports Tourer, ‘79 Miyata 912 by Gugificazione
Mentioned: 166 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 502 Post(s)
Liked 466 Times
in
256 Posts
So I am looking into doing long distances of riding a bike and I like the look of vintage bikes and they appear to be cheaper too. Can anyone explain to me what I should look for in a vintage bike to make it more useful for touring. I read other posts something about touring geometry which is relaxed head tube and seat tube angles. However, I do not know what these things means and would like some guidance and I know that racing bikes are more uncomfortable while touring bikes are the opposite and more stiff but not sure what to look for when looking online at bikes (and knowing if a back rack can be installed etc)?
I was looking at marinoni special from 90s as touring bike, but wasnt sure if its doable
Thanks!
I was looking at marinoni special from 90s as touring bike, but wasnt sure if its doable
Thanks!
I had mods done (another big Thank You! @gugie) to the fork of this Miyata 912, same model as @52telecaster’s orange one above, that make it a nice touring bike, too. It’s the black one with red front panniers and the big rando bag at the end of this group on a chilly trip down(wind!) the Willamette Valley with other C&Vers several years ago. I intentionally brought more than needed to evaluate its touring capability - great! Notably, my touring tends to be of the motel style, no sleep-on-the-ground any more for me.
Likes For Dfrost:
#9
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times
in
2,368 Posts
So I am looking into doing long distances of riding a bike and I like the look of vintage bikes and they appear to be cheaper too. Can anyone explain to me what I should look for in a vintage bike to make it more useful for touring. I read other posts something about touring geometry which is relaxed head tube and seat tube angles. However, I do not know what these things means and would like some guidance and I know that racing bikes are more uncomfortable while touring bikes are the opposite and more stiff but not sure what to look for when looking online at bikes (and knowing if a back rack can be installed etc)?
Top tubes are usually a little shorter on touring bikes as well which gives them more upright riding positions.
A good way to check a road bike for touring length is to check the distance between the seat tube and the rear tire. For a classic touring bike, you should be able to put 3 fingers in the space between the seat tube and the tire. Sport touring will take 2 fingers. Race bikes often have less than one. Here’s a race bike. See how short it is and how little room between the seat tube and tire
This is a cyclocross bike but it is similar to sport touring bikes. You can also see the shorter top tube.
And, finally, a classic touring bike. It’s really long and laid back. Not the most exciting bike to ride but excitement isn’t what you are looking for when you put a bunch of gear on the bike. What you can’t see is the stronger tubing used throughout which makes the bike less flexible.
An exciting fast bike becomes more than just “exciting” with a touring load. It can become quite scary.
I was looking at marinoni special from 90s as touring bike, but wasnt sure if its doable
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Last edited by cyccommute; 03-25-22 at 08:44 AM.
Likes For cyccommute:
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times
in
1,112 Posts
Cruise through here: Show us your Vintage Touring bikes
Many styles.
You say long distances? How much gear will you be taking on the bike with you? If you will be starting at less than 100 mile trips, and then gradually increase that distance, find a nice C&V bike that has clearance for 28 mm tires and start riding ASAP. Then you will know more about you needs and desires for your next bike. As you pointed out, they are not "expensive".
Many styles.
You say long distances? How much gear will you be taking on the bike with you? If you will be starting at less than 100 mile trips, and then gradually increase that distance, find a nice C&V bike that has clearance for 28 mm tires and start riding ASAP. Then you will know more about you needs and desires for your next bike. As you pointed out, they are not "expensive".
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
Last edited by Classtime; 03-24-22 at 04:12 PM.
Likes For Classtime:
#11
SE Wis
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 10,517
Bikes: '68 Raleigh Sprite, '02 Raleigh C500, '84 Raleigh Gran Prix, '91 Trek 400, 2013 Novara Randonee, 1990 Trek 970
Mentioned: 40 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2747 Post(s)
Liked 3,401 Times
in
2,058 Posts
Likes For dedhed:
#12
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times
in
2,368 Posts
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
#14
Member
I generally understand that the basis for judging whether it is a touring bike or a professional road bike is to look at the length of the chain and the distance between the steel pipe and the tire in the rear seat.
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: PDX
Posts: 13,056
Bikes: Merz x 5 + Specialized Merz Allez x 2, Strawberry/Newlands/DiNucci/Ti x3, Gordon, Fuso/Moulton x2, Bornstein, Paisley,1958-74 Paramounts x3, 3rensho, 74 Moto TC, 73-78 Raleigh Pro's x5, Marinoni x2, 1960 Cinelli SC, 1980 Bianchi SC, PX-10 X 2
Mentioned: 267 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4513 Post(s)
Liked 6,389 Times
in
3,674 Posts
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2020
Location: Wake Forest, NC
Posts: 5,795
Bikes: 1989 Cinelli Supercorsa
Mentioned: 11 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3514 Post(s)
Liked 2,927 Times
in
1,776 Posts
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 4,083
Mentioned: 6 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2333 Post(s)
Liked 2,097 Times
in
1,314 Posts
The main difference to me is comfort and stability response. Longer wheelbase, more trail, shallower angles, and most importantly room to mount wide tires. Racing bikes have shorter wheelbases and anything built in the last 30 years won't take a 35-40 mm width tire and until recently, most were limited to 25 mm if you were lucky
#18
framebuilder
Brakes have already been mentioned but I'll provide some specifics. Most road bikes are marketed as "go fast" bikes and until recently used skinny tires and short reach caliper rim brakes. These brakes when measured from the center of their mounting post to the center of their brakes pads would in the 40 to 50mm range. Touring bikes were designed to use fatter tires that requires different brakes - often cantilever or V brakes. These provide more tire space. Sport Touring bikes are similar to a touring bike except maybe lighter tubing (because it isn't going to carry as heavy a load). If it uses caliper rim brakes, they had more clearance under the brakes and their reach would be in the 47 to 57mm range. Just in case it isn't obvious, the frame determines which kind of brakes can be used and one type can't be exchanged for another. If you are getting a touring or sport touring frame, what you don't want is one with 39/49mm brake reach.
On a touring bike the cyclist position tends to be more upright. Their handlebar height might be about the same as their saddle They are looking around instead of being more aerodynamic and perhaps drafting the bike in front. This higher handlebar position probably requires a larger frame. If I was looking for a vintage sport touring bicycle for myself that uses a quill stem, I would want one as big as I could straddle the top tube comfortably. There are exceptions but many common quill stems did not allow for them to be raised very high up. They were made for racing bikes where the handlebars might be 5 or more cm lower than the saddle.
On a touring bike the cyclist position tends to be more upright. Their handlebar height might be about the same as their saddle They are looking around instead of being more aerodynamic and perhaps drafting the bike in front. This higher handlebar position probably requires a larger frame. If I was looking for a vintage sport touring bicycle for myself that uses a quill stem, I would want one as big as I could straddle the top tube comfortably. There are exceptions but many common quill stems did not allow for them to be raised very high up. They were made for racing bikes where the handlebars might be 5 or more cm lower than the saddle.
Likes For Doug Fattic:
#19
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Great White North
Posts: 1,226
Bikes: 2013 Cannondale Caad 8, 2010 Opus Fidelio, 1985 Peugeot UO14, 1999 Peugeot Dune, Sakai Select, L'Avantage, 1971 Gitane Apache Standard, 1999 Specialized Hard Rock
Mentioned: 10 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 548 Post(s)
Liked 473 Times
in
302 Posts
I also notice in a lot of classic touring bikes and especially for randonneur bikes, the head tube is really long, which makes sense to accommodate a large handlebar bag or front rack bag. It this intentional or is it just coincidence that the rider is very tall?
#20
Mad bike riding scientist
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 27,369
Bikes: Some silver ones, a red one, a black and orange one, and a few titanium ones
Mentioned: 152 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6222 Post(s)
Liked 4,222 Times
in
2,368 Posts
I don’t think that the head tube on touring bikes are particularly long. Small sized touring bikes have short head tubes and still use handlebar bags while large size touring bikes have long head tubes. Handlebar bags or front racks aren’t really a consideration when making the frame.
__________________
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Stuart Black
Plan Epsilon Around Lake Michigan in the era of Covid
Old School…When It Wasn’t Ancient bikepacking
Gold Fever Three days of dirt in Colorado
Pokin' around the Poconos A cold ride around Lake Erie
Dinosaurs in Colorado A mountain bike guide to the Purgatory Canyon dinosaur trackway
Solo Without Pie. The search for pie in the Midwest.
Picking the Scablands. Washington and Oregon, 2005. Pie and spiders on the Columbia River!
Likes For cyccommute:
#21
Junior Member
Thread Starter
A good way to check a road bike for touring length is to check the distance between the seat tube and the rear tire. For a classic touring bike, you should be able to put 3 fingers in the space between the seat tube and the tire. Sport touring will take 2 fingers. Race bikes often have less than one. Here’s a race bike. See how short it is and how little room between the seat tube and tire
DD
DD
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times
in
1,112 Posts
I have noticed this same thing and it frustrates me because to fit my handlebar bag on a front rack and maintain room on the tops for my hands, I need to position the rack way out front and/or use a short stem and or raise my stem beyond my preferences.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
#23
Junior Member
Thread Starter
I found a nice looking Torpado but unfortunately chainstays is 440 mm, so it is out of the game. I have found velo sport prestige but these dont look like touring bikes either although some kinda do. Other one I am looking is Peugeot PB9
#24
framebuilder
For comparison most racing frames have chainstay lengths around 415 mm depending on how they are measured. Typical road frames might be just a tad longer. Most touring bikes have head and seat tube angles around 72º . Traditional road bikes are 73º or more.
Last edited by Doug Fattic; 03-25-22 at 02:58 PM.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 4,707
Bikes: 82 Medici, 2011 Richard Sachs, 2011 Milwaukee Road
Mentioned: 55 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1952 Post(s)
Liked 2,013 Times
in
1,112 Posts
Yep. Doug what Said.
440 is pretty long. My Medici and my Centurion have 410mm chainstays. My Motobecane Grand Jubile which is characterized as a touring bike has 440mm chain stays.
Looking for pictures of this Torpado.
440 is pretty long. My Medici and my Centurion have 410mm chainstays. My Motobecane Grand Jubile which is characterized as a touring bike has 440mm chain stays.
Looking for pictures of this Torpado.
__________________
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.
I don't do: disks, tubeless, e-shifting, or bead head nymphs.