Search
Notices
Track Cycling: Velodrome Racing and Training Area Looking to enter into the realm of track racing? Want to share your experiences and tactics for riding on a velodrome? The Track Cycling forums is for you! Come in and discuss training/racing, equipment, and current track cycling events.

Carbon fork question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-26-06 | 03:17 AM
  #1  
Spor's Avatar
Thread Starter
ROBOTS...
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Carbon fork question

Any thoughts/input on my desire to replace the stock cromo fork on my 2005 bianchi pista with a carbon fork?
What size would I need?
How much should I expect to pay?
I ride 90% on the street 10% on the track, does this even make sense?
Online retailers?
brands?
thanks in advance!
Spor is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-06 | 05:29 AM
  #2  
fixedpip's Avatar
asleep at the wheel
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Chicago

Bikes: Custom Richie Ditta Track Bike, Eddie Merckx Corsa, Marioni Custom Pista, Dolan Cyclocross

You need a 1" threadless fork for a Pista. Threadless forks generally come in one length and are cut to size so unlike threaded forks, you don't need to worry about the length/size.

The hardest thing for you is going to be finding a threadless fork that matches your current fork rake. Most forks are designed for road bikes which have a more relaxed geometry than track bikes. The Pista (well the 06) model has a fork rake of 28mm. Most road forks have rakes around 40-45mm.

If you currently ride with a brake then you'll need to find a drilled fork, which for a track fork is harder to find. I know Planet-X, Terry Dolan, Look, Alpina etc all make track specific carbon forks. The Wound Up fork is also another good option (See https://www.advancedcomposites.com/woundup.htm)

The other thing that complicates this is many manufacturers have moved away from the 1" to 1 1/8" threadless systems so your choice of fork may be limited further.

I would suggest asking this in the Fixed Gear/Single speed forum as there are a ton of Pista owners there and people can probably make specific suggestions about makes/models and price and their experiences with them.

Last edited by fixedpip; 01-26-06 at 05:35 AM.
fixedpip is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-06 | 05:34 AM
  #3  
fixedpip's Avatar
asleep at the wheel
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
From: Chicago

Bikes: Custom Richie Ditta Track Bike, Eddie Merckx Corsa, Marioni Custom Pista, Dolan Cyclocross

You might one to read these threads (lots of chatter but some advice)
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...t=carbon+pista
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...t=carbon+pista
https://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...t=carbon+pista
fixedpip is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-06 | 02:00 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 5,250
Likes: 8
Why would you want to downgrade your bike? You have a sturdy, reliable fork that was designed to fit your bike. Put on a brittle, failure prone fork that is unlikely to fit as well, and to provide good clearance around your tires?

Carbon forks are popular with Pro racers because a few ounces can be worth a few seconds in a race...you are not planning to enter any races soon, are you? And, Pro racers get the bike their sponsor gives them.

Marketing guys at bike companies love carbon because they can sell carbon this and that to accountants, lawyers, and dentists and say "This bike is JUST like the bike Lance rides". And, owners of bike factories love carbon forks because they can be stamped out like cookies in Asian factories. Lots of mark-up. Lots of profit.

But, steel remains the best material for a bike fork. It absorbs road shock well. After a minor impact, it bends slightly and than resumes its correct alignment. After a major impact, it will be bent, but can be realigned by a first-rate bike shop. Carbon forks respond in only one way to stress that exceeds design limits: it shatters and it does so instantly, and without warning.

Most folks are stuck with carbon forks. It is what comes on most 2006 road bikes that sell for over $600. The customer does not have a choice. But, you do have a choice. A choice between an excellent, safe fork that you already own, and a a slightly lighter fork that may prove to be very disappointing.
alanbikehouston is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-06 | 08:21 PM
  #5  
Spor's Avatar
Thread Starter
ROBOTS...
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 169
Likes: 0
From: Berkeley, CA
Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Why would you want to downgrade your bike? You have a sturdy, reliable fork that was designed to fit your bike. Put on a brittle, failure prone fork that is unlikely to fit as well, and to provide good clearance around your tires?

Carbon forks are popular with Pro racers because a few ounces can be worth a few seconds in a race...you are not planning to enter any races soon, are you? And, Pro racers get the bike their sponsor gives them.

Marketing guys at bike companies love carbon because they can sell carbon this and that to accountants, lawyers, and dentists and say "This bike is JUST like the bike Lance rides". And, owners of bike factories love carbon forks because they can be stamped out like cookies in Asian factories. Lots of mark-up. Lots of profit.

But, steel remains the best material for a bike fork. It absorbs road shock well. After a minor impact, it bends slightly and than resumes its correct alignment. After a major impact, it will be bent, but can be realigned by a first-rate bike shop. Carbon forks respond in only one way to stress that exceeds design limits: it shatters and it does so instantly, and without warning.

Most folks are stuck with carbon forks. It is what comes on most 2006 road bikes that sell for over $600. The customer does not have a choice. But, you do have a choice. A choice between an excellent, safe fork that you already own, and a a slightly lighter fork that may prove to be very disappointing.
thank you, your sensable advice will prevent me from needlessly spending hundreds of dollars on this fork upgrade. instead i will spend hundreds on some other upgrade, probably wheels, which i am told is not neccessarily too needless. i will learn to love my stock fork for now.
Spor is offline  
Reply
Old 01-26-06 | 08:53 PM
  #6  
ZappCatt's Avatar
Back to being a Clyde....
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,544
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara

Bikes: Giant OCR1(specialized carbon seatpost,Terry Fly sadle, Syntace C2): Leader TT frame, Easton EC70fork, Aerolite bars, nashbar bullhorn, Titan Wheels: Fuji Track Pro(2003)

Originally Posted by alanbikehouston
Why would you want to downgrade your bike? You have a sturdy, reliable fork that was designed to fit your bike. Put on a brittle, failure prone fork that is unlikely to fit as well, and to provide good clearance around your tires?

Carbon forks are popular with Pro racers because a few ounces can be worth a few seconds in a race...you are not planning to enter any races soon, are you? And, Pro racers get the bike their sponsor gives them.

Marketing guys at bike companies love carbon because they can sell carbon this and that to accountants, lawyers, and dentists and say "This bike is JUST like the bike Lance rides". And, owners of bike factories love carbon forks because they can be stamped out like cookies in Asian factories. Lots of mark-up. Lots of profit.

But, steel remains the best material for a bike fork. It absorbs road shock well. After a minor impact, it bends slightly and than resumes its correct alignment. After a major impact, it will be bent, but can be realigned by a first-rate bike shop. Carbon forks respond in only one way to stress that exceeds design limits: it shatters and it does so instantly, and without warning.

Most folks are stuck with carbon forks. It is what comes on most 2006 road bikes that sell for over $600. The customer does not have a choice. But, you do have a choice. A choice between an excellent, safe fork that you already own, and a a slightly lighter fork that may prove to be very disappointing.
Dude, do you have a filter for "carbon fiber"? No matter what the discussion is, no matter what forum, you jump right in there with your "steel is real, everything else will explode catastrophically and kill you" post...
ZappCatt is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-06 | 06:55 PM
  #7  
abm1213's Avatar
...
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by ZappCatt
"steel is real, everything else will explode catastrophically and kill you"...
That made me laugh. The doubting traditionalists and the puritans are alive and well on BF.

We are doomed.
abm1213 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-06 | 07:24 PM
  #8  
wagathon's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,728
Likes: 0
I wonder how much abuse my body would have to take, over the years, to make my CF bike to go post toastie; I'm guessing . . . stairs maybe?

wagathon is offline  
Reply
Old 01-28-06 | 10:44 PM
  #9  
CafeRacer's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 411
Likes: 1
I have a Kenisis Track fork on my bike. They make them in 1" and 1.125" steers, aswell as with brake or without brake hole. Tonite mine saw some heavy sprint on the drome. Its pretty stiff considering I weigh 185lbs.
CafeRacer is offline  
Reply

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.