Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Carbon weave?

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Carbon weave?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-09-06, 09:53 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
yellowjeep's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Lenexa KS
Posts: 3,268
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Carbon weave?

All this carbon talk is kind of confusing me. What is the difference between carbon weaves. I have seen forks with 3k weaves and bike with full carbon rear triangle with 1k weaves. What is the difference, strength? lightweight? (I really have no clue where to start with this one)
yellowjeep is offline  
Old 04-09-06, 10:20 PM
  #2  
DEADBEEF
 
khuon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Catching his breath alongside a road near Seattle, WA USA
Posts: 12,234

Bikes: 1999 K2 OzM, 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times in 4 Posts
The weave is made up of fibres. Each fibre is actually composed of a certain number of strands. A 1K weave will have 1,000 strands per fibre while a 3K weave will be composed of 3,000 strands. Thus this number can sort of be considered a "density" of carbon strands in a fibre.

For a given modulus of CF, a 3K weave will be three times as heavy as a 1K weave but a structure with a 3K weave will be stiffer than one made with a 1K weave. Note that this does not mean that all 3K structures will be stiffer than all 1K structures as manufacturers will use high modulus CF to achieve in a 1K weave structure what others do using a 3K weave structure.

When considering the material of CF to be used in a structure, an engineer or designer will look at three basic attributes. These are tensile strength, modulus (stiffness) and density. So why would someone choose a lower modulus CF when they can use a higher modulus one, use a lower strand count and still achieve the same stiffness at a lower weight? One word: strength. In actuality, intermediate modulus CF has a much higher tensile strength than high or ultrahigh modulus CF.

Now of course the weave and grade of CF prepreg is just one small part of the equation. The ride quality and strength are chiefly determined by design. A CF structure may not be a homogenous one either. Some layups may have a few layers of high-modulus combined with layers of intermediate modulus. And mixing of portions of the structure of one grade of CF with another section of the same structure with another grade of CF is not uncommon. This process along with directional alignment can be used to tune the properties of the structure.
__________________
1999 K2 OzM 2001 Aegis Aro Svelte
"Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send." -- Jon Postel, RFC1122
khuon is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.