Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Road Cycling
Reload this Page >

Tire PSI vs. Rider Weight

Search
Notices
Road Cycling “It is by riding a bicycle that you learn the contours of a country best, since you have to sweat up the hills and coast down them. Thus you remember them as they actually are, while in a motor car only a high hill impresses you, and you have no such accurate remembrance of country you have driven through as you gain by riding a bicycle.” -- Ernest Hemingway

Tire PSI vs. Rider Weight

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-18-06 | 01:54 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
Tire PSI vs. Rider Weight

So i've been a 120psi front and rear because it's easy kind of guy since I bought my first bike in June. Ive just recently heard mention of a few people saying that depending on your weight, you should ride at XX psi instead of 120psi. Can anybody explain this to me? I'm right at 5'9 and 160 lbs. so I have no idea if its better or worse to ride at 120psi f/r.

Thanks in advance for dumbing it down.
nickf829 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 01:57 PM
  #2  
Grasschopper's Avatar
He drop me
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 13
From: Central PA

Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie

Being the weight you are you can run your tires at a lower PSI and for sure you can run the front lower than the rear. This will get you a bit of comfort. I, being a fat butt, run my tires nice and high so I don't get flats.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
Grasschopper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 01:59 PM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Senior Member
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
is that the only advantage to varied pressures? because im not uncomfortable riding my bike as it is
nickf829 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:03 PM
  #4  
Grasschopper's Avatar
He drop me
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 11,664
Likes: 13
From: Central PA

Bikes: '03 Marin Mill Valley, '02 Eddy Merckx Corsa 0.1, '12 Giant Defy Advance, '20 Giant Revolt 1, '20 Giant Defy Advanced Pro 1, some random 6KU fixie

If you are happy then ride it that way...one thing you may want to do is run a lower pressure if you ride in the rain...it supposedly gives a bit more contact patch and better traction.
__________________
The views expressed by this poster do not reflect the views of BikeForums.net.
Grasschopper is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:03 PM
  #5  
GuitarWizard's Avatar
Used to be a climber..
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 193
From: Tucson, AZ

Bikes: 2021 Merlin Sandstone, 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake), Trek Roscoe 9

I'm the same weight as you, and run 105 psi in the front and 110 psi in the rear. I used to do 120 in both before, and "thought" that was fine. Then I experimented a bit, and found my setup to be optimal for me. No loss of speed, and noticably more comfortable.
__________________
2016 Trek 520 (54cm) touring bike for sale - never ridden. Message me for photos/details.
GuitarWizard is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:08 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
I am 6', 200 lbs and I am running 105 psi front and rear. is that good or bad?
SeanKimStyle is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:11 PM
  #7  
GuitarWizard's Avatar
Used to be a climber..
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 193
From: Tucson, AZ

Bikes: 2021 Merlin Sandstone, 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake), Trek Roscoe 9

If I was 200 I'd probably do at least 115 at the minimum...give it a whirl and see how it goes. Doesn't hurt to experiment.

700x23, right?
__________________
2016 Trek 520 (54cm) touring bike for sale - never ridden. Message me for photos/details.
GuitarWizard is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:12 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 142
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by GuitarWizard
If I was 200 I'd probably do at least 115 at the minimum...give it a whirl and see how it goes. Doesn't hurt to experiment.

700x23, right?
yea 700x23, but on my michellen tire, it says maximum 116 psi.
SeanKimStyle is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:12 PM
  #9  
merlinextraligh's Avatar
pan y agua
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 31,809
Likes: 1,232
From: Jacksonville

Bikes: Willier Zero 7; Merlin Extralight; Calfee Dragonfly tandem, Calfee Adventure tandem; Cervelo P2; Motebecane Ti Fly 29er; Motebecanne Phantom Cross; Schwinn Paramount Track bike

Somewhere floating around here is a chart that purports to give the psi to obtain the optimal amount of tire deflection based upon tire size and rider weight.
merlinextraligh is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:28 PM
  #10  
Step Down's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 243
Likes: 1
There has been a good bit of "expert" advice leaning toward heavy'er riders lowering the PSI a bit. I'm 210 at 6'1'' and a couple of years ago quit using 120 PSI in 23's lowering it to 100, seems to give a more comfortable less compliant ride, hell I'm not racing so it works for me. If you want to know more of what the so called experts at roadbikerider.com say about the subject you got to give them money for a subscription to their site, no thanks the guy at my LBS knows just a much as "uncle al" at RBR and he will share it for free. However if I wanted advice on doing a 200K brevet I may want to pay for it from Ed Pavelka who is a legend at those types of events..........................

Here an excerpt from their free news letter

Thirty-six hours later, Ed was riding a 200-km brevet around Massanutten Mountain in northwest Virginia, and things were not going well. The climbs were relentless. A headwind was gusting to 20 mph. His pace felt rhythmless. He was overdressed and getting damp as daybreak's 28F degrees rose toward 68. He was low on fluids and beginning to ration his remaining sips. Twice, half-eaten energy bars fell from his jacket pocket and disappeared into the roadside vegetation. That made him worry about having enough food as well as enough to drink. In short, the ride was falling apart. And there were still 75 miles to go.

Exciting aint it...............


https://roadbikerider.com/
Step Down is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:29 PM
  #11  
slowandsteady's Avatar
Faster but still slow
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 5,978
Likes: 2
From: Jersey

Bikes: Trek 830 circa 1993 and a Fuji WSD Finest 1.0 2006

195 lbs and run 120 in the back. Any less than that and I am risking a pinch flat and a noticable decrease in speed. 100-110 in the front is just fine.
slowandsteady is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:35 PM
  #12  
GuitarWizard's Avatar
Used to be a climber..
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,067
Likes: 193
From: Tucson, AZ

Bikes: 2021 Merlin Sandstone, 2016 Ridley Fenix SL, 2020 Trek Emonda ALR (rim brake), Trek Roscoe 9

There has been a good bit of "expert" advice leaning toward heavy'er riders lowering the PSI a bit. I'm 210 at 6'1'' and a couple of years ago quit using 120 PSI in 23's lowering it to 100, seems to give a more comfortable less compliant ride, hell I'm not racing so it works for me. If you want to know more of what the so called experts at roadbikerider.com say about the subject you got to give them money for a subscription to their site, no thanks the guy at my LBS knows just a much as "uncle al" at RBR and he will share it for free. However if I wanted advice on doing a 200K brevet I may want to pay for it from Ed Pavelka who is a legend at those types of events..........................
That's fine and good, but you run a much higher risk of pinch flats if you go too low for your weight.

Then again, my OCLV Trek combined with 105 in the front tire and 110 in the rear tire rides great. I've run my front tire at 80-85 psi before (got a flat on the road and used a hand pump - checked the psi when I got home after doing intervals), and while I was still able to ride the same speeds for the most part, it was too soft. And I weigh 50 pounds less than you.
__________________
2016 Trek 520 (54cm) touring bike for sale - never ridden. Message me for photos/details.
GuitarWizard is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:35 PM
  #13  
Dubbayoo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

I shoot for 110-115 front and 115-120 rear but I'm 240.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:40 PM
  #14  
DocRay
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've never seen a single manufacturer ever recommend different PSI for weight, they all say run at recommended, usually 120psi for clinchers.
lower pressure may be more comfortable, but prepare for more cuts and flats, and greater rolling resistence.
 
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:44 PM
  #15  
oboeguy's Avatar
34x25 FTW!
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 6,013
Likes: 0
From: NYC

Bikes: Kona Jake, Scott CR1, Dahon SpeedPro

https://sheldonbrown.com/tires.html#pressure

/thread
oboeguy is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:44 PM
  #16  
John Wilke's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,917
Likes: 1
From: Milwaukee
Originally Posted by Dial_tone
I shoot for 110-115 front and 115-120 rear but I'm 240.
I'm also 240 lbs and I run 100 front and rear (700x23). Lots of cracks in the roads here, more pressure than that and the ride can be pretty ruff. For gravel bike paths (rail to trail kind of thing and 700x25) I run 95 front and rear.

Long ago, I recall a team mate chick asking why her bike was so skittish around corners at speed even though she was riding sewup tires. We asked here how much pressure she ran ... "Oh, usually around 170 lbs". Ohhhhhhhh ......

jw
John Wilke is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 02:46 PM
  #17  
Dubbayoo's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,681
Likes: 1
From: Atlanta

Bikes: Pedal Force QS3

Originally Posted by DocRay
I've never seen a single manufacturer ever recommend different PSI for weight, they all say run at recommended, usually 120psi for clinchers.
lower pressure may be more comfortable, but prepare for more cuts and flats, and greater rolling resistence.
Something like 60% of the weight is on the rear tire so it makes sense. Sheldon Brown says:

Since most bicycles have substantially more weight on the rear wheel than on the front, the rear tire should almost always be inflated to a higher pressure than the front, typically by about 10%.
Dubbayoo is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 03:45 PM
  #18  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,677
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by merlinextraligh
Somewhere floating around here is a chart that purports to give the psi to obtain the optimal amount of tire deflection based upon tire size and rider weight.
I created this one based on Sheldon's data points. It allows you to extrapolate using the curves to find the recomendation based on your weight. I should just post the formulas one day....

https://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...1&d=1154461177
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 03:55 PM
  #19  
chinarider's Avatar
Dan J
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Iron Mountain, MI

Bikes: 1974 Stella 10 speed, 2006 Trek Pilot 1.2

Originally Posted by Psimet2001
I created this one based on Sheldon's data points. It allows you to extrapolate using the curves to find the recomendation based on your weight. I should just post the formulas one day....

https://www.bikeforums.net/attachment...1&d=1154461177
Can you post the formula? I'm 145-150 lbs, running 28s.

Dan
chinarider is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 04:23 PM
  #20  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,677
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by chinarider
Can you post the formula? I'm 145-150 lbs, running 28s.

Dan
Formulas:

Only the intercepts change for tires between 20-28 widths. Larger widths and the slopes change. Obviously these are generalized and assumed to be linear. While not 100% correct they will give you a great place to start.

Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 33.33

Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = 0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = 0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs + 26.67


Example: You are 150lbs running 28's

Pressure (psi) = (0.33*150) +33.33 = 82.83psi (rear)
Front Pressure = .9*Front Pressure = .9*82.83psi = 74.55psi front

You could start by running 85 rear 75 front and adjust from there. For your weight I would step down to 23's which you could run at 92F - 102R. That would be nice and comfortable and have less rolling resistance than the 28's.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 04:42 PM
  #21  
chinarider's Avatar
Dan J
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,244
Likes: 0
From: Iron Mountain, MI

Bikes: 1974 Stella 10 speed, 2006 Trek Pilot 1.2

Originally Posted by Psimet2001
Formulas:

Only the intercepts change for tires between 20-28 widths. Larger widths and the slopes change. Obviously these are generalized and assumed to be linear. While not 100% correct they will give you a great place to start.

Tire Width=20: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 63.33
Tire Width=23: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 53.33
Tire Width=25: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 43.33
Tire Width=28: Pressure(psi) = 0.33 * Rider Weight in lbs + 33.33

Tire Width=32: Pressure(psi) = 0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs + 41.67
Tire Width=37: Pressure(psi) = 0.17 * Rider Weight in lbs + 26.67


Example: You are 150lbs running 28's

Pressure (psi) = (0.33*150) +33.33 = 82.83psi (rear)
Front Pressure = .9*Front Pressure = .9*82.83psi = 74.55psi front

You could start by running 85 rear 75 front and adjust from there. For your weight I would step down to 23's which you could run at 92F - 102R. That would be nice and comfortable and have less rolling resistance than the 28's.

Wow, that seems low. The tires say 120 max.

I'm running 28's cause they came with my bike (Trek Pilot 1.2). I have considered going down to 25s. Not sure if 23s will fit on my rims.

I assume that the upshot of all this is that the lower PSIs (as adjusted for weight) give more comfort without sacrificing performance or durability. Do I have this right? I'm a little confused about the comments that lower PSI helps protect against flats (crossing fingers: I've never had one going back to 74 when I got my Stella 10 speed; which is still a pretty functional bike, by the way). At least on car tires, they say higher PSI gives better durability. Is this apples & oranges? Thanks for the info.

Dan
chinarider is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 04:50 PM
  #22  
blue_nose's Avatar
Scottish Canuck in the US
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, CA

Bikes: Trek 2100, Cervélo Carbon Soloist

I rememebr this post from the RoadBiker newsletter. Interesting take on lowering pressure a bit:

https://www.roadbikerider.com/UArant....ire%20Pressure
blue_nose is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 04:57 PM
  #23  
Psimet2001's Avatar
I eat carbide.
Titanium Club Membership
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 21,677
Likes: 1,417
From: Elgin, IL

Bikes: Lots. Chapter2, Van Dessel, Giant, Trek, etc Dealers for BMC, Chapter2

Originally Posted by chinarider
Wow, that seems low. The tires say 120 max.

I'm running 28's cause they came with my bike (Trek Pilot 1.2). I have considered going down to 25s. Not sure if 23s will fit on my rims.

I assume that the upshot of all this is that the lower PSIs (as adjusted for weight) give more comfort without sacrificing performance or durability. Do I have this right? I'm a little confused about the comments that lower PSI helps protect against flats (crossing fingers: I've never had one going back to 74 when I got my Stella 10 speed; which is still a pretty functional bike, by the way). At least on car tires, they say higher PSI gives better durability. Is this apples & oranges? Thanks for the info.

Dan
Sorry...let me step back from my recomendation. The pressure seemed low in my eyes as well, but for your light weight on such a large tire they don't seem totally out of line. I believe your rim on that pilot would handle a 23, but 25's would probably be a better recomendation(83F-92R).

The "correct" pressure in your tire is what will allow it to perform the best for both comfort and durability.

BTW the "Max" pressure listed on the sidewalls has more to do with legalities than with performance.
__________________
PSIMET Wheels, PSIMET Racing, PSIMET Neutral Race Support, and 11 Jackson Coffee
Podcast - YouTube Channel
Video about PSIMET Wheels

Psimet2001 is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 04:58 PM
  #24  
noisebeam's Avatar
Arizona Dessert
20 Anniversary
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,029
Likes: 2,170
From: AZ

Bikes: Cannondale SuperSix, Lemond Poprad. Retired: Jamis Sputnik, Centurion LeMans Fixed, Diamond Back ascent ex

Here is another chart.
https://www.precisiontandems.com/phot.../tirechart.jpg
Keep in mind for weight use the total load - the bike weight, plus rider, plus clothes (shoes, helmet), all accessories, etc.
Al
noisebeam is offline  
Reply
Old 09-18-06 | 05:12 PM
  #25  
Hambone's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,023
Likes: 0
From: Bootiful Brooklyn, NY

Bikes: GT Edge for the road/Specialized Hopper (well the frame and the bb, everything else is new) for the dirt

Originally Posted by chinarider
Wow, that seems low. The tires say 120 max.
The important thing to note is 120 max. Many manufacturers also talk about min pressure.
Originally Posted by chinarider
I'm a little confused about the comments that lower PSI helps protect against flats
I had trouble getting my melon around that. This is how I think about it: there are pinch flats and there are puncture flats. Pinch flats are from too low a pressure and those we can all understand (tube gets pinched between rim and pothole.)

Puncture flats are harder. Think of the "bits of glass" as a high school ring on the fist of some guy in a bar fight. The tight skin in your forehead is the high pressure tire and your cheek -- the lower pressure tire. If he hits you in the forehead, you are going to bleed. Blood here = air in your tire. He hits your cheek, your blood stays yours.

As always... the best thing you can do is avoid the "bits of glass."
Hambone is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.