![]() |
Originally Posted by Ken Cox
All skidding aside, I have a mechanical intuition that larger chainring and sprocket pairs have lower stresses and greater efficiencies.
My LBS needed two guys and a cheater bar on the chain whip to get an 18t cog off my wheel. |
Who is it that said : Give me a lever and I shall lift the Earth?
Right, well that guy is the saint patron of all engineers. |
Originally Posted by travsi
just remember, big chainring = sexy
|
Originally Posted by cicadashell
possible selection criteria:
a) availability of parts 2) number of skid patches iii) spreading out the wear i would pick the combination easiest to obtain - z.b. i have a 17-tooth cog already, all i need is the chainring (although of course cogs are less expensive than chainrings). |
Originally Posted by killsurfcity
i'm a little confused by this chart... i ride 53/17. does that mean i have 17 skid patches?
Al |
sweet! that coincides nicely with being poor.
|
Skid Patch
Originally Posted by noisebeam
(Post 1086563)
Of course, but the chart still gives a comparison that is valid. Not to mention that one can spin tires on the rims - but the bottom line is that the higher number of skid spots the less you have to think about any of this.
Al It doesn't matter because with one foot your repetitions are every 2*pi Rad and with two feet they're every pi Rad, but you can "fit" the pi Rad into the 2*pi Rad, they just happen with twice the intensity. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:15 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.