just curious, really
#1
Major Major
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: oakland
Posts: 199
Bikes: Zebrakenko (nishiki knock-off) fixed. Its all broke though. Now, some other old, unidentified japanese frame, freshly spray-painted black(kinda hot). Puch, ss...or is that fffda7th's?
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
just curious, really
__________________
he's getting rather old but he's a good mouse
he's getting rather old but he's a good mouse
#2
無くなった
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sci-Fi Wasabi
Posts: 5,072
Bikes: I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I do. There's a homeless guy I see walking a few times a week that's always wearing one, too.
Wake up with broken bones in your skull, you decide helmets are good.
Wake up with broken bones in your skull, you decide helmets are good.
#3
Happy Cycling
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: SF
Posts: 417
Bikes: bareknuckle, bomber pro, 3Rensho SR, nagasawa special
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
i heard some 100lbs girl actually polished off one of those burgers in less than 3 hours.
#7
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 131
Bikes: Gios (Road), Zullo (Track), Fixed Giant Conversion (MTB), Kona (Commute)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by somebodies
#9
Newbie
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
What I find funny is the fact that people who wear helmets(inluding me sometimes) don't wear them when they drive a car. Someone once told me that they did not need a helmet in a car because, although they were travelling at speeds in excess of 70mph, they were surrounded by metal and glass....I had a point but I seem to have forgot what it was.
#15
Chronic Tai Shan
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: PHL/BAL
Posts: 1,118
Bikes: Pake Single Speed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by dwj444
Always wear your helmet
Never know when you'll wipe out
Man that rabbit tastes great
Never know when you'll wipe out
Man that rabbit tastes great
#17
Freestyle Walker
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: La Grange/Chicago / Illinois/ United States/ Earth
Posts: 62
Bikes: Kink Empire Revision B, IRO Mark V*, Standart STA500, Terrible One Barcode*
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I wear my helmet.
#18
I am an incurable.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 993
Bikes: IRO Mark V pro (RIP), Bianchi Giro, Giant Xtc1, Redline Conquest Pro, Kelly Deluxe singlespeed.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Why not? I know too many people whose story ends with "and I would have been killed if I didn't have my helmet on." Pardon the pun, but it seems like a no-brainer to me. I look uncool and poseuresque regardless of what is on my head (pancakes included).
That said, I am sitting at at a coffee shop right now helmet free because "it is only a few blocks from my office." Perhaps I should take my own advice.
That said, I am sitting at at a coffee shop right now helmet free because "it is only a few blocks from my office." Perhaps I should take my own advice.
__________________
www.oldsylebeer.com
www.oldsylebeer.com
#19
hang up your boots
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 1,574
Bikes: 84 Pinarello, Trek Liquid 30, Torker CX 24, Gromada Track
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Heads will roll!
#20
likes avocadoes
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 1,125
Bikes: heh, like that info would fit here...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Work regulations (which I helped write) say wear a helmet. I'm not sure how much (if at all) helmets protect folks, but I have used them in two collision. Helmet definitely helped me in one of them. I'm also an economist, and will tell you that risk compensation is real (folks behave more dangerously when they think they are protected.) When I'm not working, though, I probably wear a helmet about 50% of the time. (other 50% I just wear the pancake)
#21
Retrogrouch in Training
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Knee-deep in the day-to-day
Posts: 5,484
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
a) Of course risk compensation is real. Usually it's the pro-helmet faction that argues that it's not (as counterpoint to those who say they would behave more dangerously if they had a helmte). Of course their very argument, that cycling is too dangerous without a helmet, proves that we are liable to increase our risk if we believe ourselves to be protected.
b) Can you be sure that a helmet helped you? That's the thing: if you hit your head and weren't injured, there's no evidence that had you hit your unhelmeted head you would have been hurt. And the converse is true. It's like saying I knocked on wood and haven't been run over yet, so clearly it really is lucky. You're an economist, you should know better. What would prove it is to have a well-designed, non-biased study that compared similar types of accidents between sufficiently large helmeted and unhelmeted populations and assessed efficacy based on that. Said study would need to control for cyclist ability, environment, age, sex, and probably a few other things that I can't think of.
It seems like they should, common-sense-wise--which is why I wear one--but the dramatic increase in helmet use rates has not had any discernable impact on fatality rates anywhere once you control for changes in cyclist populations.
Ken Kifer has a nice exploration: https://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/advocacy/mhls.htm
b) Can you be sure that a helmet helped you? That's the thing: if you hit your head and weren't injured, there's no evidence that had you hit your unhelmeted head you would have been hurt. And the converse is true. It's like saying I knocked on wood and haven't been run over yet, so clearly it really is lucky. You're an economist, you should know better. What would prove it is to have a well-designed, non-biased study that compared similar types of accidents between sufficiently large helmeted and unhelmeted populations and assessed efficacy based on that. Said study would need to control for cyclist ability, environment, age, sex, and probably a few other things that I can't think of.
It seems like they should, common-sense-wise--which is why I wear one--but the dramatic increase in helmet use rates has not had any discernable impact on fatality rates anywhere once you control for changes in cyclist populations.
Ken Kifer has a nice exploration: https://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/advocacy/mhls.htm
#22
Sheldon Certified
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: San Francisco And Crimebridge
Posts: 203
Bikes: '81 Bianchi road/track conversion, certified by Sheldon
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Lucky-Charms
I heard it's the lack of a fat layer constricting the expansion of the stomach. I don't mean over time, I mean in one sitting.
IFOCE!
#24
likes avocadoes
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: oakland, ca
Posts: 1,125
Bikes: heh, like that info would fit here...
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by bostontrevor
a) Of course risk compensation is real. Usually it's the pro-helmet faction that argues that it's not (as counterpoint to those who say they would behave more dangerously if they had a helmte). Of course their very argument, that cycling is too dangerous without a helmet, proves that we are liable to increase our risk if we believe ourselves to be protected.
b) Can you be sure that a helmet helped you? That's the thing: if you hit your head and weren't injured, there's no evidence that had you hit your unhelmeted head you would have been hurt. And the converse is true. It's like saying I knocked on wood and haven't been run over yet, so clearly it really is lucky. You're an economist, you should know better. What would prove it is to have a well-designed, non-biased study that compared similar types of accidents between sufficiently large helmeted and unhelmeted populations and assessed efficacy based on that. Said study would need to control for cyclist ability, environment, age, sex, and probably a few other things that I can't think of.
It seems like they should, common-sense-wise--which is why I wear one--but the dramatic increase in helmet use rates has not had any discernable impact on fatality rates anywhere once you control for changes in cyclist populations.
Ken Kifer has a nice exploration: https://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/advocacy/mhls.htm
b) Can you be sure that a helmet helped you? That's the thing: if you hit your head and weren't injured, there's no evidence that had you hit your unhelmeted head you would have been hurt. And the converse is true. It's like saying I knocked on wood and haven't been run over yet, so clearly it really is lucky. You're an economist, you should know better. What would prove it is to have a well-designed, non-biased study that compared similar types of accidents between sufficiently large helmeted and unhelmeted populations and assessed efficacy based on that. Said study would need to control for cyclist ability, environment, age, sex, and probably a few other things that I can't think of.
It seems like they should, common-sense-wise--which is why I wear one--but the dramatic increase in helmet use rates has not had any discernable impact on fatality rates anywhere once you control for changes in cyclist populations.
Ken Kifer has a nice exploration: https://www.kenkifer.com/bikepages/advocacy/mhls.htm
Not sure if I made myself clear. I'm primarily in the non-mandatory-helmet faction. I've read all of Ken Kifer's work and generally agree. I also was pleased to see a large discussion on the subject in the riv reader a few issues back. The only significant studies of helmet use are regarding motorcycle helmets, and those generally show no safety increase in states with helmet laws.
The time that I referenced when a helmet most likely helped me was when I was dragged along for several yards. The helmet was pretty chewed up by the road. The head was relatively unscathed.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Don't call it Beantown
Posts: 321
Bikes: Iro Mark V Fix and a 24" Nirve bmx
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I find that eating without the fat belt increases confidence so that the eater will move beyond their percieved limits, but this can sometimes end in disaster. A fat belt can sometimes make the user more careful in their eating habits.