Gear Ratio Question - Track set up to normal Fixie
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Gear Ratio Question - Track set up to normal Fixie
Hello I just got my first single speed/fixie. Its gear ratio is 47-17. This feels like an awfully large gear and I think its setup more for a track bike right now. I was wondering if anybody knows of any cogs in the back larger than a 17 or would that not work? I cant find any. Or am I going to have to change the crank.
Just a matter of curiosity what are most riding gear wise for riding hillyish (about 500ft of climbing for every 10 miles) on rural road on a fixie. Or just whats a good standard fixie gearing. Thanks!
Just a matter of curiosity what are most riding gear wise for riding hillyish (about 500ft of climbing for every 10 miles) on rural road on a fixie. Or just whats a good standard fixie gearing. Thanks!
Last edited by TyWinans; 12-09-17 at 05:35 PM.
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
189 Posts
That gearing would actually be way too low for track. I usually ride 48-17 on the road. If you feel like it's too high, you can definitely get a bigger cog easily. I've used 18's and 19's in the past when I wanted lower gearing. These are decent: https://www.retro-gression.com/colle...city-track-cog
#3
~>~
Here's a handy gear calculator to work with:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
#4
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks for help. The recommended Gear inches for road riding is extremely helpful. Now I have a starting point that isnt for urban riding. Thanks again!
#6
- Soli Deo Gloria -
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Northwest Georgia
Posts: 14,782
Bikes: 2018 Rodriguez Custom Fixed Gear, 2017 Niner RLT 9 RDO, 2015 Bianchi Pista, 2002 Fuji Robaix
Mentioned: 235 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6839 Post(s)
Liked 725 Times
in
459 Posts
I'm a roadie who discovered fixed gear and so I ride 48-16 (79 GI) on the road.
-Tim-
-Tim-
Last edited by TimothyH; 12-09-17 at 08:54 PM.
#8
Calamari Marionette Ph.D
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4,347
Bikes: Felt TK2, Felt Z5
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
19 Posts
Not at all. I was running 36:13 on a bike at one time. That was 72.85 Gear Inches. Didn't like how spinny it was especially since it is flat as a pancake here. Felt very restricted in how uncomfortable it was to spin that out to anywhere near 17 mph.
#11
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,653
Bikes: 30 frames + 76 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1202 Post(s)
Liked 581 Times
in
338 Posts
Wait a minute here. Do you consider 80 rpm to be spinning out ?! Because that’s what you get with 36:13 at 17 mph, assuming a 700 x 23c tire. I routinely ride that gear very comfortably at well over 20 mph, and can easily spin over 30 mph on downhills. Oh well, different strokes for different folks.
#12
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 4,347
Bikes: Felt TK2, Felt Z5
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 943 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times
in
19 Posts
Wait a minute here. Do you consider 80 rpm to be spinning out ?! Because that’s what you get with 36:13 at 17 mph, assuming a 700 x 23c tire. I routinely ride that gear very comfortably at well over 20 mph, and can easily spin over 30 mph on downhills. Oh well, different strokes for different folks.
#14
Clark W. Griswold
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: ,location, location
Posts: 11,169
Bikes: Foundry Chilkoot Ti W/Ultegra Di2, Salsa Timberjack Ti, Cinelli Mash Work RandoCross Fun Time Machine, 1x9 XT Parts Hybrid, Co-Motion Cascadia, Specialized Langster, Phil Wood Apple VeloXS Frame (w/DA 7400), R+M Supercharger2 Rohloff, Habanero Ti 26
Mentioned: 48 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3425 Post(s)
Liked 2,729 Times
in
1,825 Posts
#15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: PHL
Posts: 9,948
Bikes: Litespeed Catalyst, IRO Rob Roy, All City Big Block
Mentioned: 19 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1332 Post(s)
Liked 393 Times
in
189 Posts
Some people like to ride higher gears at lower RPMs. Other people like to ride lower gears at higher RPMs. Both are okay.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 11,258
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 115 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3842 Post(s)
Liked 2,703 Times
in
1,766 Posts
Ty, I consider 47-17 to be a very high gear and always have, even when I was a 24 yo road racer. Now I used the bike for winter and bad weather training, not group rides. 42-17 to 42-14 was my usual range back then. You can get much smaller chainring or a bigger cog. They are available up to 24 teeth. The bigger ones a harder to find but are out there. (I have all from 12 to 24 so I can gear my bike for mountain climbs and descents.)
Ben
Ben
#17
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 58
Bikes: Cinelli Mash Histogram, Raleigh Tokul 3, All-City Macho Man
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I ride in similar terrain (500 ft. of climb every 10 miles) and I've found 48/18 (70.22 inches) to be my personal sweet spot. Hills are totally manageable, start/stopping in traffic is easy, and I can still spin a little over 30mph on descents. It's also easier to skid if you're trying to look hella sick on da street. I used to ride 48/16, but gearing down a bit really livened the bike up.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,800
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 613 Times
in
394 Posts
I've been happy with 46:19 on similar terrain. These are just the gears that I happened to pull out of my bin one day. It seems to be the sweet spot for me. I'm not super athletic, so I can work as hard as I want and not spin out except on long descents. I find myself riding a bit faster than on my geared bikes, just to get into a comfortable cadence, so it helps keep me from getting lazy.
In a sense, single speed means getting used to always being in the wrong gear.
In a sense, single speed means getting used to always being in the wrong gear.

#19
~>~
If you learn to speak/write in Gear Inches, the default gearing language of track and FG/SS riders for the last century or so, there is no confusion over the wheel size, tires width/height, chain-ring or cog one is using. GI is a clear concise value including all of these variables to express distance per crank revolution.
Here's a handy gear calculator to learn the lingo with:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
-Bandera
Here's a handy gear calculator to learn the lingo with:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
-Bandera
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: New Rochelle, NY
Posts: 36,723
Bikes: too many bikes from 1967 10s (5x2)Frejus to a Sumitomo Ti/Chorus aluminum 10s (10x2), plus one non-susp mtn bike I use as my commuter
Mentioned: 131 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4754 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 749 Times
in
467 Posts
47/17 is very common gearing for street use. As noted above, it's way too low for competition on the track.
I set up my street bike with 47/17 way back in 1968, and never had a reason to reconsider.
However, there are larger rear sprockets, so if the OP wants something lower it wont be an issue, except possibly (but not likely) may call for a longer chain.
I set up my street bike with 47/17 way back in 1968, and never had a reason to reconsider.
However, there are larger rear sprockets, so if the OP wants something lower it wont be an issue, except possibly (but not likely) may call for a longer chain.
__________________
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
FB
Chain-L site
An ounce of diagnosis is worth a pound of cure.
“Never argue with an idiot. He will only bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.”, George Carlin
“One accurate measurement is worth a thousand expert opinions” - Adm Grace Murray Hopper - USN
WARNING, I'm from New York. Thin skinned people should maintain safe distance.
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Hotel CA / DFW
Posts: 1,395
Bikes: 83 Colnago Super, 87 50th Daccordi, 79 & 87 Guerciotti's, 90s DB/GT Mtn Bikes, 90s Colnago Master and Titanio, 96 Serotta Colorado TG, 95/05 Colnago C40/C50, 06 DbyLS TI, 08 Lemond Filmore FG SS, 12 Cervelo R3, 20/15 Surly Stragler & Steamroller
Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 468 Post(s)
Liked 522 Times
in
338 Posts
I ride a 46-16 around mostly flat Dallas and find its a nice choice for maintaining higher rpms than I would on my road bike. Its a nice ratio for starting in the city and averaging 16..18 on the longer runs. Not enough gear to keep up with the faster road bike riders in some of the group meetups.
#22
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 10
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Thanks everybody. This gear inch language is something I definitely have to research more, until this week I never heard of it before. When I rode the 47-17 on a bike trail it felt ok but hard enough I knew Id struggle on the road with hills. I ended up ordering a 20T cog figured that would be a good enough starting point to go from.
#23
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 3,800
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1031 Post(s)
Liked 613 Times
in
394 Posts
If you learn to speak/write in Gear Inches, the default gearing language of track and FG/SS riders for the last century or so, there is no confusion over the wheel size, tires width/height, chain-ring or cog one is using. GI is a clear concise value including all of these variables to express distance per crank revolution.
Here's a handy gear calculator to learn the lingo with:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
-Bandera
Here's a handy gear calculator to learn the lingo with:
https://www.sheldonbrown.com/gear-calc.html
-Bandera

For the OP, the math isn't hard. Here's how I worked it: My wheel diameter is 27.25 inches, so the gear inches of 46:19 gearing is 27.25*46/19 = 65.9, rounded up to 66 inches.
#24
Junior Member
i ride a 33-22 SS just over a walking speed. Average 5mph for about 20 miles. Just what I like.
Not in a hurry to go back and sit on the couch
Not in a hurry to go back and sit on the couch
#25
Super-duper Genius
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Muskrat Springs, Utah
Posts: 1,310
Mentioned: 18 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 582 Post(s)
Liked 645 Times
in
329 Posts
I have a track bike with 49 x 16, which I find I can only really handle on flat terrain (or descents, of course... but any route with descending in it will also have some climbing). I have to hope for no headwinds when I set out on it. It is my lightest and stiffest bike, and the most aero, all of which help a little.
My other fixed gear bike has 46 x 17, which is quite versatile on flat to slightly hilly terrain, just nothing steep. I spin out on even moderate descents, but I find this ratio a good compromise for all-around use.
I have a single speed bike set up for commuting, and have settled on 46 x 18 for it. Because it has a freewheel, the slightly lower ratio is not a disadvantage on descents. It's as heavy as a boat anchor, so climbing hills with it is still a chore. But it's a very comfortable bike, and I can ride it for hours without pain. I'm considering putting a 3-speed internally geared hub on it, to make it more versatile without completely sacrificing the attributes I like about it (simple, durable, low maintenance).
As Bandera said above, somewhere around 70 gear inches is appropriate for most riders. But many factors come into play, including fitness level, riding style, terrain (of course), and others.
When I say I can't handle hills on my track bike, that's not completely true. My favorite place to ride it is at a city park with a 1.3 mile loop that includes two short but fairly steep hills. I love to cruise at a moderate pace on the flats, try to keep up with frantic spinning on the descents, and when I come to the climbs, stand up and sprint as hard as I can. It's a great interval workout. I normally do 10 or 12 laps (13 to 16 miles), and I average about 4:15 per lap: that's an average speed of about 18.5 mph, sustained for 43 minutes or so. The funnest part is smoking roadies on the climbs. They inevitably downshift and lose some speed; I actually accelerate up the hills. When you don't have the option of shifting gears, you learn how to sprint.
The downside to that bike is I have to load it up on the car and drive it to the park, which is quite some distance from my house. I ride there and back on my other bikes sometimes, but never on the 49 x 16.
My other fixed gear bike has 46 x 17, which is quite versatile on flat to slightly hilly terrain, just nothing steep. I spin out on even moderate descents, but I find this ratio a good compromise for all-around use.
I have a single speed bike set up for commuting, and have settled on 46 x 18 for it. Because it has a freewheel, the slightly lower ratio is not a disadvantage on descents. It's as heavy as a boat anchor, so climbing hills with it is still a chore. But it's a very comfortable bike, and I can ride it for hours without pain. I'm considering putting a 3-speed internally geared hub on it, to make it more versatile without completely sacrificing the attributes I like about it (simple, durable, low maintenance).
As Bandera said above, somewhere around 70 gear inches is appropriate for most riders. But many factors come into play, including fitness level, riding style, terrain (of course), and others.
When I say I can't handle hills on my track bike, that's not completely true. My favorite place to ride it is at a city park with a 1.3 mile loop that includes two short but fairly steep hills. I love to cruise at a moderate pace on the flats, try to keep up with frantic spinning on the descents, and when I come to the climbs, stand up and sprint as hard as I can. It's a great interval workout. I normally do 10 or 12 laps (13 to 16 miles), and I average about 4:15 per lap: that's an average speed of about 18.5 mph, sustained for 43 minutes or so. The funnest part is smoking roadies on the climbs. They inevitably downshift and lose some speed; I actually accelerate up the hills. When you don't have the option of shifting gears, you learn how to sprint.
The downside to that bike is I have to load it up on the car and drive it to the park, which is quite some distance from my house. I ride there and back on my other bikes sometimes, but never on the 49 x 16.