? on computer and tires
#1
無くなった
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sci-Fi Wasabi
Posts: 5,072
Bikes: I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
? on computer and tires
So I broke down and bought a real computer because my GPS just wasn't doing the trick for me, and I've got a quick question :
If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer? Or do these tires run fatter or slimmer than normal 23c? They look a little fatter.... Actually, when I went to check the specs on them just now, I noticed that my front fork has been wearing away the rubber on the front tire! Time to dremel again, I guess...
Thanks.
If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer? Or do these tires run fatter or slimmer than normal 23c? They look a little fatter.... Actually, when I went to check the specs on them just now, I noticed that my front fork has been wearing away the rubber on the front tire! Time to dremel again, I guess...
Thanks.
#3
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: not where i used to be
Posts: 4,847
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
not all 23's are 23's
do a roll out to measure the *real* circumference of your wheels and input that number.
do a roll out to measure the *real* circumference of your wheels and input that number.
#4
...
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Posts: 708
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
1 Post
1.) You could not fret over the ridiculously marginal difference
2.) You could measure your rollout distance on a daily basis before riding (this is especially applicable if you're riding brakeless). Don't forget to properly weight the bike at the intended psi so that you can take into account tire deformation.
2.) You could measure your rollout distance on a daily basis before riding (this is especially applicable if you're riding brakeless). Don't forget to properly weight the bike at the intended psi so that you can take into account tire deformation.
#5
Shadow Member
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: brooklyn (chicago until july07)
Posts: 189
Bikes: bareknuckle fixed, cannondale track, nishiki conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
***scratches head*** sorry im still a bit new (after reading/lurking for a while) but does this belong in a diffrent subsection? this is the first question i have heard about computers for a bike here (the ss/fixed section).
seems like there would another section that uses bike computes more.
seems like there would another section that uses bike computes more.
#6
Lone Fixie
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Providence, RI
Posts: 209
Bikes: Fixie/SS: Specialized "Langster", Hobo SS: Schwinn World Sport
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say repost this one in the Road Cycling forum, you'll probably get more/better/less sarcastic) answers there, maybe.
#7
Ride more.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HereNT
So I broke down and bought a real computer because my GPS just wasn't doing the trick for me, and I've got a quick question :
If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer?
If I'm running 700x23c Conti Ultra 2000's, should I still be using the 23c setting in the computer?
-JAB
#8
無くなった
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sci-Fi Wasabi
Posts: 5,072
Bikes: I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 80sMutRider
I'd say repost this one in the Road Cycling forum, you'll probably get more/better/less sarcastic) answers there, maybe.
Originally Posted by jab
You could start out with the 23c setting in the computer (rolling diameter 2097mm, per Sheldon), and use your GPS to fine-tune it.
#9
LF for the accentdeprived
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If I were you, I'd be more worried about the "front fork wears the tire away" bit. That sounds bad.
Just set the computer according to the 23c value they give and fine-tune it later to the milestones (?) on a country road.
Just set the computer according to the 23c value they give and fine-tune it later to the milestones (?) on a country road.
#10
無くなった
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sci-Fi Wasabi
Posts: 5,072
Bikes: I built the Bianchi track bike back up today.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
If I were you, I'd be more worried about the "front fork wears the tire away" bit. That sounds bad.
#11
Spoked to Death
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 1,335
Bikes: Salsa La Cruz w/ Alfine 8, Specialized Fuse Pro 27.5+, Surly 1x1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Just do a rollout test... I always do them, since I don't trust the charts. Pump your tires up, put a mark on the front tire, and a mark on the ground on a long flat place. Line the marks up, and then roll the bike forward for 10 revolutions, stopping with the mark right at the ground. Make another mark on the ground there, and then measure the distance between the two marks, and divide by ten. The long rollout will reduce your error, and you'll get a veeery close circumference measure. It only takes a few minutes, and is easier than trying to line up to road markers (which aren't always accurate either).
peace,
sam
peace,
sam
#12
Ride more.
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 75
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HereNT
My GPS told me I hit 147mph the other day. I'm not really trusting it anymore - that's why I got the computer.
That doesn't render GPS totally untrustworthy; one just needs to keeps its limitations in mind.
Two ways come to mind to get good GPS data for calibration: 1) on a straight, flat course with a good signal, make waypoints (and some sort of visual markers) at the ends of the course. Then, ride that course a few times with the bike computer. The GPS distance between the waypoints should be really accurate for comparison against the bike computer. 2) set the GPS up on the bike so that it holds a good signal while riding, reset the GPS and bike computer odometers, and ride for a few miles. I used #2 over several short (3-10mi) trips to convince myself that my bike computer was giving reasonable values. I kept an eye on the satellite signal display during tests.
-JAB