Chain tension on SS Conversion
#1
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
150 Posts
Chain tension on SS Conversion
If you've built a single speed around a frame with dropouts with no fore/aft adjustability, you know how hard it can be to find that magic gear. Now, add in a narrow/wide chainring. Oof. But, I think I got it. My question is about chain tension.
The chain has some slight sag. But, I can't it off the sprocket or chainring without "helping" it, i.e., pushing it to the side while pedaling - same method as when the chains are tight. I've run looser without issues. But, figured I'd see what you guys think. Any issues from what you can see?
The chain has some slight sag. But, I can't it off the sprocket or chainring without "helping" it, i.e., pushing it to the side while pedaling - same method as when the chains are tight. I've run looser without issues. But, figured I'd see what you guys think. Any issues from what you can see?

Last edited by Zaskar; 04-27-23 at 06:34 AM.
Likes For Zaskar:
#2
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 1,595
Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 398 Post(s)
Liked 245 Times
in
124 Posts
Track slack, amirite?
What size chain do you use on a narrow-wide ring anyway? You obviously know the ins and outs of conversion and are willing to live without being able to adjust your chain tension but if it exists for your size chain a single half-link can be a wonderful help in situations like yours. Good luck - have fun...
What size chain do you use on a narrow-wide ring anyway? You obviously know the ins and outs of conversion and are willing to live without being able to adjust your chain tension but if it exists for your size chain a single half-link can be a wonderful help in situations like yours. Good luck - have fun...
#3
Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 761
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 463 Post(s)
Liked 266 Times
in
150 Posts
Track slack - wow. Yeah, that's what makes me think I'm fine. 2000 watts with two extra links may work on the track, but seems like it's a bunnyhopped pothole away from flying off. A single speed sprocket (deep compared to a multi-speed cog), a well-aligned chain should keep even a very loose chain in place. The narrow/wide is supposed to take it even further. But, they're not compatible with half-links since it creates a "narrow-narrow" link.
#4
Veteran Racer
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,744
Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels
Mentioned: 26 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1294 Post(s)
Liked 719 Times
in
411 Posts
Track slack - wow. Yeah, that's what makes me think I'm fine. 2000 watts with two extra links may work on the track, but seems like it's a bunnyhopped pothole away from flying off. A single speed sprocket (deep compared to a multi-speed cog), a well-aligned chain should keep even a very loose chain in place. The narrow/wide is supposed to take it even further. But, they're not compatible with half-links since it creates a "narrow-narrow" link.
Taking it a step further, if it were me, I would ditch the NW chainring, replace it with a standard 3/32" chainring with no ramps or twisted teeth and add a 3/32" half-link. I am assuming you are currently using a 3/32" chain and your freewheel has a 3/32" cog.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
Last edited by TejanoTrackie; 04-27-23 at 09:42 AM.