Need hub advice for wheelbuilding
#1
Newbie
Thread Starter
Need hub advice for wheelbuilding
Hello, I’m building up an early ‘90s Schwinn Paramount 26” mtb including wheels, and the brakes will be cantilever, not disc. I got a beautiful vintage Phil Wood front hub, and what I’m thinking for the rear wheel is to run it single speed (I live in Chicago—no hills) but with the possibility of running it as a geared 1x in the future. So, does it make the most sense to build a rear wheel with a geared hub and convert it to run single speed when I want (using a chain tensioner), or to build two separate wheels—one SS and one geared—and swap them out?
With either solution—building one rear wheel or two—what 36h 135mm hubs would people recommend? (I have 36h Velocity Cliffhanger rims.)
With either solution—building one rear wheel or two—what 36h 135mm hubs would people recommend? (I have 36h Velocity Cliffhanger rims.)
#2
Newbie
Personally, I don't like converting multispeed freehubs to single speed. The freehub body looks super weird and your spoke tension drive side and non-drive side will be unnecessarily uneven. Realistically these aren't actual problems. Off the top of my head I can only think of Paul that has a 135mm single speed hub, although White Industries and Hope might have them as well.
I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
Likes For trashbiker:
#3
Newbie
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by trashbiker;[url=tel:22956570
22956570[/url]]Personally, I don't like converting multispeed freehubs to single speed. The freehub body looks super weird and your spoke tension drive side and non-drive side will be unnecessarily uneven. Realistically these aren't actual problems. Off the top of my head I can only think of Paul that has a 135mm single speed hub, although White Industries and Hope might have them as well.
I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
I have a "tringle" speed, which is a front triple with rear single speed, friction shifted. If you are frequently switching between ss and geared, it totally works to leave the derailleur on and shifted to where the ss cog is. It'll save you the hassle of cabling everything and swaping chains everythime. However, if you are mostly set on ss and running a 24mm spindle crank, velo orange has an eccentric bb that fits in a bsa shell so you can eliminate the tensioner.
#4
Tinker-er
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 330
Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1958 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1971 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR, V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper", 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials, 1951 Rudge Aero Clubman
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
133 Posts
Why not a Surly Ultra rear hub? The flip-flop is $75 at a few retailers. Ride it a while then save up to build up a new wheel and switch to a multi-speed system when you need to scratch that itch.
Likes For PhilFo:
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,601
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
650 Posts
Unless you have 3 rims and the money to blow on building a spare wheel for whenever you decide to use it, I'd build up an XT hub and just use a single cog with a chain tensioner. Last year I figured out my gearing for cross season and bought a kit with a decent singlespeed cog with a wide base so it wouldn't cut into an aluminum freehub which came with a series of spacers that covered the rest of the freehub. Doesn't look as great as running a single speed hub would but still looked fine. And if you do have money to blow, then spend it on a rear phil hub to match the front.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#6
Newbie
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by Russ Roth;[url=tel:22957460
22957460[/url]]Unless you have 3 rims and the money to blow on building a spare wheel for whenever you decide to use it, I'd build up an XT hub and just use a single cog with a chain tensioner. Last year I figured out my gearing for cross season and bought a kit with a decent singlespeed cog with a wide base so it wouldn't cut into an aluminum freehub which came with a series of spacers that covered the rest of the freehub. Doesn't look as great as running a single speed hub would but still looked fine. And if you do have money to blow, then spend it on a rear phil hub to match the front.
#7
Tinker-er
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 330
Bikes: 1956 Rudge Sports; 1958 Rudge Sports; 1983 Univega Alpina Uno; 1981 Miyata 610; 1973 Raleigh Twenty; 1971 Raleigh Twenty; 1994 Breezer Lightning XTR, V4 Yuba Mundo aka "The Schlepper", 1987 Raleigh "The Edge" Mountain Trials, 1951 Rudge Aero Clubman
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 128 Post(s)
Liked 192 Times
in
133 Posts
Why buy an eccentric bottom bracket only to use it with a hub designed to run a cassette? If you want to tension your single speed chain perfectly with vertical dropouts, you have a lot of room for adjustment using different cogs and a half link if necessary. Granted, the eccentric plus cassette hub gives you the most options in one bike but at greater expense and greater probability of creaking bottom bracket parts. If the plan is to swap to a cassette, then a cassette hub, like an M535 (easier to work on than XT) is definitely your best bet, but not with a $100 bottom bracket. You can get a decent amount of upgrade in rear derailleur for what you save between the cost of a standard square taper and the eccentric. Then you have the issue of once you decide to stick a cassette on that rear wheel, you're not going back at a whim to a no-frills single-speed bicycle. You'll be riding a 1xN with only one cog but all the other parts of a multi-speed bike, and it's almost never as simple as swapping wheels because that rear derailleur is going to need to be trimmed to guide to a single cog. This path only makes sense if you already have a wheel built (with a freehub) and want to ride now, but are saving up for a shifter and derailleur, which will be the permanent, end-stage of the bicycle. If that's the case, go for it, cassette hub, single cog, a little bit of math for gearing and chain tension with a half-link added. Then you have your single-speed with the clean lines and simplicity of a single-speed bike. Maybe add a chain tensioner for convenience. Eventually, you'll add the rear derailleur, the shifter, the housing and cable, and you'll have a multi-speed bike, which will never conveniently go back to a single-speed because there is no reason to ride with a working derailleur adjusted to sit over a lonely cog on a freehub.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.
Last edited by PhilFo; 07-19-23 at 09:00 AM.
Likes For PhilFo:
#8
Newbie
Thread Starter
Why buy an eccentric bottom bracket only to use it with a hub designed to run a cassette? If you want to tension your single speed chain perfectly with vertical dropouts, you have a lot of room for adjustment using different cogs and a half link if necessary. Granted, the eccentric plus cassette hub gives you the most options in one bike but at greater expense and greater probability of creaking bottom bracket parts. If the plan is to swap to a cassette, then a cassette hub, like an M535 (easier to work on than XT) is definitely your best bet, but not with a $100 bottom bracket. You can get a decent amount of upgrade in rear derailleur for what you save between the cost of a standard square taper and the eccentric. Then you have the issue of once you decide to stick a cassette on that rear wheel, you're not going back at a whim to a no-frills single-speed bicycle. You'll be riding a 1xN with only one cog but all the other parts of a multi-speed bike, and it's almost never as simple as swapping wheels because that rear derailleur is going to need to be trimmed to guide to a single cog. This path only makes sense if you already have a wheel built (with a freehub) and want to ride now, but are saving up for a shifter and derailleur, which will be the permanent, end-stage of the bicycle. If that's the case, go for it, cassette hub, single cog, a little bit of math for gearing and chain tension with a half-link added. Then you have your single-speed with the clean lines and simplicity of a single-speed bike. Maybe add a chain tensioner for convenience. Eventually, you'll add the rear derailleur, the shifter, the housing and cable, and you'll have a multi-speed bike, which will never conveniently go back to a single-speed because there is no reason to ride with a working derailleur adjusted to sit over a lonely cog on a freehub.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.
In a nutshell, if you want a single-speed, build a single-speed. If you want a bike with multiple gearing options, build that.
Part of why I'd like to build the bike more versatile is to see which way I like it better, ss or geared. I'll definitely admit to being non-committal about it! I had even resolved to shell out for a White Ind ENO eccentric ss hub but then balked when I thought I might end up wanting to go geared 1x. So, seeing if there is a happy way to deal with indecision...
#9
Newbie
Thread Starter
This actually felt like a very convincing route to go but then it turned out (as far as I can tell) that Surly stopped making 36h ultra rear hubs! Looks to me like they're only 32h, which wouldn't work with the 36h rims I'd like to build up. Thinking to give Surly a call and see if there isn't just one old 36h hub lying around somewhere... If you find a link to one, please do share here!!
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: South Shore of Long Island
Posts: 2,601
Bikes: 2010 Carrera Volans, 2015 C-Dale Trail 2sl, 2017 Raleigh Rush Hour, 2017 Blue Proseccio, 1992 Giant Perigee, 80s Gitane Rallye Tandem
Mentioned: 12 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1008 Post(s)
Liked 901 Times
in
650 Posts
I haven't though I'd considered one, came down to cost, a basic chain tensioner was 20 bucks and the eccentric BB was more and I already had a decent BB for the crank.
Likes For Russ Roth:
#12
Newbie
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by bioVah;[url=tel:22963007
22963007[/url]]I am converting a wheel designed for a cassette to a single fixed gear, but am not sure exactly what adapter I need.
#13
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 12,414
Bikes: (2) ti TiCycles, 2007 w/ triple and 2011 fixed, 1979 Peter Mooney, ~1983 Trek 420 now fixed and ~1973 Raleigh Carlton Competition gravel grinder
Mentioned: 121 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 4461 Post(s)
Liked 3,542 Times
in
2,303 Posts
Un-dished rear wheels are simply better - unless you simply have to have that dish. Now 2-4mm dish is not an issue but tons? Like the typical 10+ speed hub? Yeah, they work but compared to an un-dished wheel, they suck. Don't believe me? Take hard right turn corners on rough roads at speed with both and compare. (100,000 miles both dished and un-dished here. I speak from experience.)
I cannot speak for chain tensioners as I have never used them. Likewise eccentric BBs. I am a huge fan of horizontal dropouts for non-derailleur use. Simple., clean, work really well and are so versatile. But you've got what you've got. (To me, the gravitation to nearly all derailleur bikes having vertical dropouts is sad. Horizontal dropouts do everything vertical dropouts do and just as well except - resist the wheel from sliding forward; you gotta use a steel skewered asymmetrical QR and really short chainstayed bikes can make getting the rear wheel in and out hard. You "gotta have" vertical dropouts to locate modern derailleurs in the proper position relative to the cassette for indexing - or just set those little screw adjustments properly on your horizontal dropouts. Those screws also compensate for poor frame alignment whereas with vertical dropouts you are stuck or break out the file. Rant, rant.
A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
I cannot speak for chain tensioners as I have never used them. Likewise eccentric BBs. I am a huge fan of horizontal dropouts for non-derailleur use. Simple., clean, work really well and are so versatile. But you've got what you've got. (To me, the gravitation to nearly all derailleur bikes having vertical dropouts is sad. Horizontal dropouts do everything vertical dropouts do and just as well except - resist the wheel from sliding forward; you gotta use a steel skewered asymmetrical QR and really short chainstayed bikes can make getting the rear wheel in and out hard. You "gotta have" vertical dropouts to locate modern derailleurs in the proper position relative to the cassette for indexing - or just set those little screw adjustments properly on your horizontal dropouts. Those screws also compensate for poor frame alignment whereas with vertical dropouts you are stuck or break out the file. Rant, rant.

A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
Likes For 79pmooney:
#14
Newbie
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by 79pmooney;[url=tel:22963122
22963122[/url]
A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
A really nice double sided hub is the Ben's Cycling hub. High flange, traditional and gorgeous. I've bought two, built up one. What a joy to build! Spokes just want to be in those flanges! I haven't put it thorough its paces yet but it's hard to believe I'm going to be disappointed. Feels like quality all the way through. The price was quite reasonable and the online transaction fast.
#15
It's the little things
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Chicagoland
Posts: 785
Bikes: Too many, yet not enough
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 274 Post(s)
Liked 301 Times
in
137 Posts
Likes For Senrab62:
#16
Live not by lies.
Join Date: Nov 2020
Posts: 1,306
Bikes: BigBox bikes.
Mentioned: 3 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 857 Post(s)
Liked 779 Times
in
581 Posts
I agree with the horizontal dropout preference.
I don’t see what is “bad” about the old way of mounting derailer mounts with that clamp that fit inside the dropout.
It seems like you can (or factory can) make that clamp into any adjustment or position you would need for different RDs, while leaving all the options open for SS, IGH, flip flop hubs, coaster brakes, etc.
My guess is it was to make bikes more idiot proof.
I don’t see what is “bad” about the old way of mounting derailer mounts with that clamp that fit inside the dropout.
It seems like you can (or factory can) make that clamp into any adjustment or position you would need for different RDs, while leaving all the options open for SS, IGH, flip flop hubs, coaster brakes, etc.
My guess is it was to make bikes more idiot proof.
#17
Newbie
Thread Starter
I believe he's speaking about the Milwaukee Bicycle Co track hubs. If that i79pmooney is referring to, I can attest as well. They are wonderful hubs and a good value. I have two sets with thousands of trouble free miles. They're pretty light, well finished, and spin well.