![]() |
biopace chain ring - fixie conversion
Can I convert my road bike with Shimano Biopace to a fixie? My intuition tells me that I won't be able to set a consistent chain tension if the front chain ring is not round?
Am I over thinking this? GG |
biopace aren't round?
are they square? |
|
Check a few weeks back, some guy did it on his fixie and posted how he did it and how it felt. Sounds like he liked it a lot. If you ever need NOS biopace and rather get a set of a fellow forum person vice harris cyclery, please pm me
|
Originally Posted by poopncow
Check a few weeks back, some guy did it on his fixie and posted how he did it and how it felt. Sounds like he liked it a lot. If you ever need NOS biopace and rather get a set of a fellow forum person vice harris cyclery, please pm me
|
Originally Posted by ginger green
I'm familiar with all the words you used, just not the order you put them in. ;)
best post ever. :p |
Originally Posted by moeuf
roffle.
best post ever. :p |
I put a 53 tooth biopace on my Pista a few weeks ago and I love it.
I set the chain tension so I have about an .25" play at the tight spots and .75" at the loose spots. While riding it feels two or three teeth smaller and easier on my knees, though I have not had any knee problems in the past year. A few days ago I changed chainrings in preparation for winter. I wanted a smaller chainring so I could brake more effectively and thus stay off the front brake on frosty mornings. I put on a 47t Sugino/SR chainring. When I first rode with the 47t chainring the bike felt ridiculously slow, so I took it on 12.5 training ride I know real well. With the 53t ring I do this ride in 55 minutes. With the 47t ring I did it in 50 minutes. Thirteen point six mph vs 15 mph. What a surprise. However, my knees felt funny after the biopace. Ideally, I would like a 49t biopace, which should feel about the same as a conventional 47t chainring but gentler on the knees. Alas, they don't make, to my knowledge, a 49t biopace. Next summer I wonder what I'll do. Will I go back to the 53t biopace? It sure feels good. And fast. How can it go slower? :) |
Originally Posted by Ken Cox
I put a 53 tooth biopace on my Pista a few weeks ago and I love it.
I set the chain tension so I have about an .25" play at the tight spots and .75" at the loose spots. While riding it feels two or three teeth smaller and easier on my knees, though I have not had any knee problems in the past year. A few days ago I changed chainrings in preparation for winter. I wanted a smaller chainring so I could brake more effectively and thus stay off the front brake on frosty mornings. I put on a 47t Sugino/SR chainring. When I first rode with the 47t chainring the bike felt ridiculously slow, so I took it on 12.5 training ride I know real well. With the 53t ring I do this ride in 55 minutes. With the 47t ring I did it in 50 minutes. Thirteen point six mph vs 15 mph. What a surprise. However, my knees felt funny after the biopace. Ideally, I would like a 49t biopace, which should feel about the same as a conventional 47t chainring but gentler on the knees. Alas, they don't make, to my knowledge, a 49t biopace. Next summer I wonder what I'll do. Will I go back to the 53t biopace? It sure feels good. And fast. How can it go slower? :) People here kept telling you you are riding too tall a gear for your hilly terrain - now you have proved it for yourself ;) PS. I really enjoy reading your posts, keep it up. Regards, v. |
I ride a converted late 80's rock hopper with 48x17 gearing, with a 48t biopace chainring. I don' t give it a second thought, I just get on and ride.
|
My ring is a 52T on the front - what sized gear should I put on the back for a starter?
|
Originally Posted by ginger green
My ring is a 52T on the front - what sized gear should I put on the back for a starter?
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:06 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.