Senior Member
Quote:
It's aluminum. However, the cross check has 132.5 mm spacing to take both road and mountain hubs, and the rob roy is steel, so it might not mind being cold set to 135. They're both 'cross bikes though, so no steep angles and tons of clearance.Originally Posted by OneTinSloth
i shoved a 135 XT mountain hub in my trek 600, which is spaced at 130. if the jamie roy is steel, it's all good.
Quote:
- 120 or 110 rear spacing
- a fixed gear
- no brakes or brake drilling
- steep angles
- tight clearances
- high bottom bracket
- TOC (toe clip overlap)
Not to be dense, but how steep should the angles be? And should they be the same front and rear?
Also, how high should the BB be. And is it better to talk about BB height or BB drop (front wheel axle centerline)? Oh, and is there a reason why TOC is required? I'm gonna assume 700C (ISO 622) wheels.
And if someone could list chainstay length and fork offset, I'd be obliged. Thanks!
One more thing... how tight are the clearances?
Is this going to result in the Kogswell Model BC (by committee)?Originally Posted by Kogswell
So, here's what I have so far:- 120 or 110 rear spacing
- a fixed gear
- no brakes or brake drilling
- steep angles
- tight clearances
- high bottom bracket
- TOC (toe clip overlap)
Not to be dense, but how steep should the angles be? And should they be the same front and rear?
Also, how high should the BB be. And is it better to talk about BB height or BB drop (front wheel axle centerline)? Oh, and is there a reason why TOC is required? I'm gonna assume 700C (ISO 622) wheels.
And if someone could list chainstay length and fork offset, I'd be obliged. Thanks!
One more thing... how tight are the clearances?

Matthew Grimm / Flunky
Quote:
(I think you meant Model BK - by kommittee)Originally Posted by jim-bob
Is this going to result in the Kogswell Model BC (by committee)?
And, yeah, by committee is right.
Half our frames are designed by way of collaboration. I like to give people what they want.
The other half of the time I just make what I want.
That and I'd like to get a handle on what you all are thinking.
Quote:
- 120 or 110 rear spacing
- a fixed gear
- no brakes or brake drilling
- steep angles
- tight clearances
- high bottom bracket
- TOC (toe clip overlap)
Not to be dense, but how steep should the angles be? And should they be the same front and rear?
Also, how high should the BB be. And is it better to talk about BB height or BB drop (front wheel axle centerline)? Oh, and is there a reason why TOC is required? I'm gonna assume 700C (ISO 622) wheels.
And if someone could list chainstay length and fork offset, I'd be obliged. Thanks!
One more thing... how tight are the clearances?
Originally Posted by Kogswell
So, here's what I have so far:- 120 or 110 rear spacing
- a fixed gear
- no brakes or brake drilling
- steep angles
- tight clearances
- high bottom bracket
- TOC (toe clip overlap)
Not to be dense, but how steep should the angles be? And should they be the same front and rear?
Also, how high should the BB be. And is it better to talk about BB height or BB drop (front wheel axle centerline)? Oh, and is there a reason why TOC is required? I'm gonna assume 700C (ISO 622) wheels.
And if someone could list chainstay length and fork offset, I'd be obliged. Thanks!
One more thing... how tight are the clearances?
brake drillings are fine (at least in the rear). toe clip overlap isn't necessarily required, but i feel track bikes should have a shorter front end than road bikes, preferably equal to or no more than 1.5cm more than the seat tube. chainstays should be less than 40 cm. 35-40 degress of fork offset (depending on size of frame and head tube angle). no less that 74 degree head and seattube angle (again, that depends on the size of the frame). oh, and clearances should allow for nothing larger than 23mm tires.
my opinions based on what i will get when purchase a custom/BTO frame.
Senior Member
Quote:
apparently the frameset will be still 135, but when bought as a complete bike the frame will be spaced 120. not sure why they'd bother - maybe because they have started making track cranks too.Originally Posted by tbk
on one il pompino is 135mm, until the new ones come out
I am just lovin' mine to death, but there is no way you can consider this a track bike (or any other 135 spaced frame for that matter)
marty
Senior Member
Quote:
you are looking for a frame with fork ends as opposed to dropouts, aren't you?Originally Posted by alcahueteria
So I am wondering if there are any. I am about to buy some new hubs, but I am also about to build up a ss 29er, so if there were any 135 spaced track frames I could use these same wheels for both and that would be badass. thanks
Bike jocks ar still jocks
I'm really confused by 29ers... How could they be the same size as 700c if 700c is supposed to be a little smaller than 27" wheels? Is "29ers" just a nickname?
Cornucopia of Awesomeness
^ "marketing term" not "nickname" 
BTW 27"s aren't 27" either

BTW 27"s aren't 27" either
Senior Member
Quote:
29 is nominal tire diameter, just like 26" or 27". They aren't rim sizes. Yes, it's kind of silly.Originally Posted by Portlandonian
I'm really confused by 29ers... How could they be the same size as 700c if 700c is supposed to be a little smaller than 27" wheels? Is "29ers" just a nickname?
Senior Member
Quote:
And, yeah, by committee is right.
Half our frames are designed by way of collaboration. I like to give people what they want.
The other half of the time I just make what I want.
That and I'd like to get a handle on what you all are thinking.
Well, personally I think my Steamroller is about perfect for a road going fixed gear bike. I don't want a track style bike at all. The Steamroller handles wonderfully and I can run a long reach front brake and fatter tires. The only things I'd change are adding eyelets for racks and fenders although that tends to mess up the clean look.Originally Posted by Kogswell
(I think you meant Model BK - by kommittee)And, yeah, by committee is right.
Half our frames are designed by way of collaboration. I like to give people what they want.
The other half of the time I just make what I want.
That and I'd like to get a handle on what you all are thinking.
Retrogrouch in Training
Hell, 700c is nominal tire diameter.
700C is a rim+tire combo that's supposed to be 700mm across. Do the math, that's a 39mm tire if you really had a 700C tire. Yowza.
29ers are supposed to be about 29" with a 2.3" tire.
27" calls for a 1-1/4" tire.
26" means 1.75" tires.
700C is a rim+tire combo that's supposed to be 700mm across. Do the math, that's a 39mm tire if you really had a 700C tire. Yowza.
29ers are supposed to be about 29" with a 2.3" tire.
27" calls for a 1-1/4" tire.
26" means 1.75" tires.
