Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

triathlon frames

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-04-06, 11:27 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
triathlon frames

Tri frames are sexy. no doubt.
Has anybody here had experience using them? I have found some sleek candidates to use. I'm looking at a Leader frame. 78 degree seat tube, track ends with built in screws to tension. nothing says tight geometry like a tt frame.
does anyone know of a good frame with a high bb or is 65mm not that bad? I'm also hesitant about riding aluminum.
Ready to Ruck is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 11:45 AM
  #2  
live free or die trying
 
humancongereel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: where i lay my head is home.
Posts: 6,999

Bikes: bianchi pista workhorse, cannondale r1000, mountain bike fixed conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i rode one the other weekend. just a short jaunt, the bike was way too small for me and the toe overlap was a pain. it felt a little weird, but it could have just been the size.

however, talking to someone who has one here in town, he tells me that although his has a front rack, he never uses it for anything except carrying his chihuahau. he said that with anything bigger than that, the weight placement detracts from the bike's handling since his body weight is already being directed forward.
humancongereel is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 03:22 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
cogsci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 94
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've been riding a tri frame (650c) and I have no complaints (def. not a relaxed riding position, but real fast)

cogsci is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 03:33 PM
  #4  
puvpntb
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 794
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Nat looks angier than you, and he isn't the one doing the natty fab
gregg is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 03:33 PM
  #5  
如果你能讀了這個你講中文
 
genericbikedude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
!!
genericbikedude is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 07:55 PM
  #6  
1 trick pony
 
dogpound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: on my bike
Posts: 1,017
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have one.
I only race on it, as that's what it's for
dogpound is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 07:58 PM
  #7  
Banned
 
zelah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Portland
Posts: 2,535

Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dogpound
I have one.
I only race on it, as that's what it's for
haha @ riding a bike in a matter fitting "what it's for", wrong board
zelah is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 10:57 PM
  #8  
re:member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Cracow, Poland
Posts: 874

Bikes: unknown make TT bike, fixed; Romet Sport, gone; titanium Pinarello gone;Colnago with Campy C-Record/Super Record,on it's way; Funny Gianni Motta; Buehler track, Polrad track chrome; titanium MTB on 28'', fixed; Tri Wheeler, fixed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I am still thinking about converting my Wheeler T1 titanium triathlon 650cc bike to fixed. The problem as I see it is a slack head tube angle, suitable for forward position when using aero bars. Despite that, this bike has second shortest wheelbase in my stable.
vobopl is offline  
Old 06-04-06, 11:29 PM
  #9  
Beausage is Beautiful
 
Fugazi Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Saitama, Japan
Posts: 5,504

Bikes: Nabiis Alchemy

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 20 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 13 Times in 8 Posts
I miss Chicago...

Also, tri frames are mad sexy. I dream of a Cervelo P3...
__________________
Yo. Everything I’m doing is linked on What’s up with Dave? but most of note currently is Somewhere in Japan.
Fugazi Dave is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:22 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
used to have a QR kilo 650 in my racing days.

Loved that bike, but as others implied, its really designed for putting your head down and going really fast in a straight line on a flat earth.

Cogsi, hows that slingshot working out fixed? Any flex when backpedaling?
stevo is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:25 AM
  #11  
make way for the MGL
 
MLPROJECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,927

Bikes: khs aero track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
what's the diff on a tri frame? are they usually just lighter/more aero?

are you ready to ruck? like the song? goddamn right.
MLPROJECT is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:43 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MLPROJECT
what's the diff on a tri frame? are they usually just lighter/more aero?
similar geo to a track bike, with slacker headtube Often (but less so these days) 650c. Designed around riding on your forearms forward of the crank.

Usually aero tubing.
stevo is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:47 AM
  #13  
make way for the MGL
 
MLPROJECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,927

Bikes: khs aero track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
right on... i noticed a lot have weird stuff like no seat stays or no seat tube... is this just to save weight?
MLPROJECT is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:54 AM
  #14  
LF for the accentdeprived
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Budapest, Hungary
Posts: 3,549
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
That's to make it more aero. Quite a few tri bikes are the "beam" style cuz the triathlon regulations don't require the diamond structure or whatever they call it. They are heavier than two-triangle frames.

LóFarkas is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 05:55 AM
  #15  
make way for the MGL
 
MLPROJECT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NEW YORK
Posts: 1,927

Bikes: khs aero track

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
interesting. i have this old issue of iD that has a bunch of old bike frames like that talking about when they were made, when they were banned and why... i didn't know you could still use them in any racing.
MLPROJECT is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 06:26 AM
  #16  
Biggity-bam
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: West Lafayette IN, Ann Arbor MI
Posts: 698

Bikes: Pista Concept, Fetish beater, Fuji road

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
the other advantage of those beam bikes is energy disipation. They are a bit more comfortable than a normal tri bike. The beam flexing dampens out a noticeable amount of energy, the only problem is that sometimes the oscillations of the post and your pedaling will fall in sink and it can get kind of sloppy. I could see those beam bikes being insanely comfortable compared to the new Cervelo, with the vertical seat tube. I'd still roll the Cervelo though, it looks like sex.
Learn_not2burn is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 07:50 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 997
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Learn_not2burn
the other advantage of those beam bikes is energy disipation. They are a bit more comfortable than a normal tri bike. The beam flexing dampens out a noticeable amount of energy, the only problem is that sometimes the oscillations of the post and your pedaling will fall in sink and it can get kind of sloppy. I could see those beam bikes being insanely comfortable compared to the new Cervelo, with the vertical seat tube. I'd still roll the Cervelo though, it looks like sex.
I've never ridden a beam, but my understanding was that it IMPROVES pedalstroke because pedaling inefficiencies are magnified (much like pedaling fixed). That was the marketing at one time anyway.

All this tri-talk makes me want to race again. Havent had any full-contact swims in a few years; lol.
stevo is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 09:26 AM
  #18  
ya'll can't mush me
 
vomitron's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: san diego, ca
Posts: 839
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Tri frames aren't exactly like track frames.

Steep seat angles != track. around 74-76 is standard for track, while around 76-78 is standard for tri. Also, the front/center is very different. Some people have fudged with the front/center and fork rake enough that they can get an 80 degree seat tube, but still have their saddle nose less than 5cm from the BB (and not have it be twitchy like a tweaker). If it had to be likened to a track bike, I'd say pursuit geometry is closest.
vomitron is offline  
Old 06-05-06, 09:39 AM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin TX
Posts: 455
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm also looking for frames marketed as TT.
For those who don't know: tri frames vary in seat tube angles. The ones with slacker (closer to 75 degree) seat tubes are for tri events that involve a long long ride, while the ones made for those with short sprints have the tightest geometry (closer to 80). The point is to angle the rider in such an aero position that they use only the muscles most efficient for pedaling and save energy in the muscles required for running.
I'm looking for frames marketed as timetrial moreso because they, on general, have about a 75degree seat post.
And yeah head tube angles are generally 73-74degree ish which, if you've road a road bike, is common.

Lastly, vobopl why do you see that as a problem? Why don't you just narrow bullhorns on that frame?

Oh and a final question for you guys: Is a steel fork suitable for an aluminum frame?
Ready to Ruck is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.