Pake framset
#2
Me talk pretty one day.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
#4
So I says to Mable I says
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,947
Bikes: '05 Urbanite Fixie, '06 Lemond Croix de Fer, '06 Jamis Dragon Pro, '07 IRO Bikeforums Track, '07 Planet-X Uncle John
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by eyefloater
#5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 389
Bikes: Pake fixie. Klein Reve (for sale, https://www.theveer.net/gordons_klein)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Fixedgear gallery just posted a review:
https://fixedgeargallery.com/framebuilders/pake/
I'm not sure if I agree with the "super stiff" fork finding. The front end of my Pake seems as congenial as that on any of my other bikes, even on 700x23c tires. Maybe I have mushy arms, or maybe the forks vary. Anyway, forks are easy to replace.
My Surly Cross Check may be more versatile, but my Pake is more fun.
https://fixedgeargallery.com/framebuilders/pake/
I'm not sure if I agree with the "super stiff" fork finding. The front end of my Pake seems as congenial as that on any of my other bikes, even on 700x23c tires. Maybe I have mushy arms, or maybe the forks vary. Anyway, forks are easy to replace.
My Surly Cross Check may be more versatile, but my Pake is more fun.
#6
dutret has a posse
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: washington dc
Posts: 3,155
Bikes: IRO Angus 53, Marinoni Special 54, LMNO Custom Road Bike, Guerciotti TT, Late 60s Bottechia Road, Univega Via Montega beater/polo/rain bike.
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
baldylocks just picked up one of these frames. i haven't talked to him about how he likes it yet. and there was one parked down the street earlier today when i was bringing my lunch back to work.
#7
poser/hipster/whatever
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: milwaukee, philly, and back, minneapolis in july
Posts: 994
Bikes: d/a allez -trek t1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by geog_dash
Fixedgear gallery just posted a review:
https://fixedgeargallery.com/framebuilders/pake/
I'm not sure if I agree with the "super stiff" fork finding.
https://fixedgeargallery.com/framebuilders/pake/
I'm not sure if I agree with the "super stiff" fork finding.
-jason
#8
Alba-Core
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 708
Bikes: Kogswell Model G, Surly Pacer, Pake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I just built one up last week and I love that thing. I built it cuz I wanted something to be a little harder on and xthugmurderx is 100% right, it takes it like a champ.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 549
Bikes: Fuji Track 06, Fuji Delrey conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Personally, I think that it's freakin' SLICK!
I want one. But I lack funds, and haven't ridden this Fuji frame into the ground yet. -_-;;
I want one. But I lack funds, and haven't ridden this Fuji frame into the ground yet. -_-;;
#10
Destroyer of Worlds
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm happy that I didn't get one. For the cost of the Pake framset and a little bit, I got a real track frame of columbus steel and campy/cinelli components. That's a rare find, but you can find good track bikes for cheaper than you can build up a pake.
#11
Me talk pretty one day.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by kyledr
I'm happy that I didn't get one. For the cost of the Pake framset and a little bit, I got a real track frame of columbus steel and campy/cinelli components. That's a rare find, but you can find good track bikes for cheaper than you can build up a pake.
#13
Ride for Life
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,740
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Originally Posted by kyledr
I'm happy that I didn't get one. For the cost of the Pake framset and a little bit, I got a real track frame of columbus steel and campy/cinelli components. That's a rare find, but you can find good track bikes for cheaper than you can build up a pake.
as for my opinion of the pake (as an owner), i think it's a nice frame. it's a little heavy but it is clean and takes a beating. i thought the fetish and level frames that are always on ebay are freakin UGLY. didn't like the cable braze-ons on the cityfixed (nor the reputation of NYCbikes). though the spicer frame was in an ugly color (school bus yellow). so i was basically down to the mercier kiloTT and the pake. i bought the first one i found at the better price.
this was before i saw the green kiloTT's though, i wish i'd known those were coming!
however at $309? that's starting to get steep for me, i might splurge another $20 for an Angus.
#14
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
***Warning! Cynical Message Alert***
These Pake frames sure are pretty...seriously...I think they look really really nice. However, they're made with plain old 4130 (not even a treated version like true temper as far as I can tell). They weigh in at over 5 pounds and the fork is no featherweight either. I just have to wonder why people would consider buying these for $320 when they could pick up an old beater to convert. There are plenty of bikes out there made of 4130, a variety of Reynolds Steels, Tange Steels, etc for under $100....and I mean complete bikes that you can still use many of the old parts. I have 2 Treks right now that are incredible after 20 years. Even if you decided to get a paint job for the frame, it would still cost less than $100 for the paint. Anyhow....as I write this, it seems a bit jerky and judgemental...that's not my intention. I just feel a bit underinformed of why folks would go this route if they could pick up something used and old that is going to be cheaper and just as good. Am I just and old fogey that can't keep us with the times?
These Pake frames sure are pretty...seriously...I think they look really really nice. However, they're made with plain old 4130 (not even a treated version like true temper as far as I can tell). They weigh in at over 5 pounds and the fork is no featherweight either. I just have to wonder why people would consider buying these for $320 when they could pick up an old beater to convert. There are plenty of bikes out there made of 4130, a variety of Reynolds Steels, Tange Steels, etc for under $100....and I mean complete bikes that you can still use many of the old parts. I have 2 Treks right now that are incredible after 20 years. Even if you decided to get a paint job for the frame, it would still cost less than $100 for the paint. Anyhow....as I write this, it seems a bit jerky and judgemental...that's not my intention. I just feel a bit underinformed of why folks would go this route if they could pick up something used and old that is going to be cheaper and just as good. Am I just and old fogey that can't keep us with the times?
#15
poser/hipster/whatever
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: milwaukee, philly, and back, minneapolis in july
Posts: 994
Bikes: d/a allez -trek t1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
difference in geometry and bottom bracket height? that's a few reasons. i think that a rear facing track dropout is a whole hell of a lot easier to deal with that stupid road frames. i got mine at shop discount for $185. I had all the other components with the exception of a 27.0 seatpost and 1" threadless headset already (phil/open pro wheels, phil bottom bracket, sugino mighty cranks, bontrager stem and deda elementi drops) minus 27.0 seatpost and 1" threadless headset already...i can't really think of a reason not to get one. can you? sure they're heavy (roughly translated to "takes a beating") and the fork is ugly (but i hate when only aethestics are considered, you can keep your colored rims). I don't know. it works for what i use it for.
-jason
-jason
#17
Me talk pretty one day.
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,073
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
1" threaded headset? FSA Orbit X - it's even cartridge bearing. Done. A lot of shops still sell it w/out the fork, so you can provide your own (I got my frame at a co-op called the Bike Hub or something). You could either get a Steamroller fork for it which is lugged or pull a chromed road fork from the used pile of any bike shop.
The geometry of the bike is nice and the steel's tough. I couldn't give two ****s if it weighs a pound more than some other frame because I use it for my ****ing commuter - I'm not doing a time trial up the alpes.
The geometry of the bike is nice and the steel's tough. I couldn't give two ****s if it weighs a pound more than some other frame because I use it for my ****ing commuter - I'm not doing a time trial up the alpes.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by xthugmurderx
difference in geometry and bottom bracket height? that's a few reasons. i think that a rear facing track dropout is a whole hell of a lot easier to deal with that stupid road frames. i got mine at shop discount for $185. I had all the other components with the exception of a 27.0 seatpost and 1" threadless headset already (phil/open pro wheels, phil bottom bracket, sugino mighty cranks, bontrager stem and deda elementi drops) minus 27.0 seatpost and 1" threadless headset already...i can't really think of a reason not to get one. can you? sure they're heavy (roughly translated to "takes a beating") and the fork is ugly (but i hate when only aethestics are considered, you can keep your colored rims). I don't know. it works for what i use it for.
-jason
-jason
edit: I also don't give a flip what the fork looks like as long as it holds the wheel, fits in the head tube and holds the stem. however, it ain't light........
#19
poser/hipster/whatever
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: milwaukee, philly, and back, minneapolis in july
Posts: 994
Bikes: d/a allez -trek t1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
the geometry isn't all that relaxed. that's the point. it's the same as the rush, if i remember correctly. i dunno, i'll admit to talking crap on them a while back, but that was all unsubstantiated and stupid. they're nice frames for what they are.
#20
>>>>>>>>>
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: philly
Posts: 219
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
crap talker! comin' back to philly?
anyway, just built one o' these for a friend. we opted for a threaded fork. seemed pretty nice, not light, but it wasn't mind-bogglingly heavy either. i like that the decals were so easy to remove. seatpost was a ***** to get in, and yes i'm aware they are 27.0.
anyway, just built one o' these for a friend. we opted for a threaded fork. seemed pretty nice, not light, but it wasn't mind-bogglingly heavy either. i like that the decals were so easy to remove. seatpost was a ***** to get in, and yes i'm aware they are 27.0.
#21
poser/hipster/whatever
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: milwaukee, philly, and back, minneapolis in july
Posts: 994
Bikes: d/a allez -trek t1
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
meh, mine is lighter than my friends full keirin level, so i win (i'm faster too (that's right tom)). and maybe someday, but i don't know when. ****s hit the fan.
-jason
-jason
#22
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Imperial Beach, CA
Posts: 705
Bikes: GT Pulse Track, 93 Bridgestone XO-1 & 93 RB-1, Ritchey Swiss Cross, Ritchey Road Logic, Yoshi Konno/3Rensho Specialized Allez, Cannondale Slate, Cannondale SuperSix EVO/Disc and Cannondale Hooligan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 143 Times
in
50 Posts
for the same $ you can pick a 56cm gt gtb on the bay
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE%3AIT&rd=1
https://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...MESE%3AIT&rd=1
#24
Destroyer of Worlds
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 446
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
=wearyouryouth
Okay, how about $250 built up? Do that with anything but the worst parts on a pake and I'll be impressed. If you're willing to look harder, it's easy to find a good bike at a good price that is much more personal than a mass-produced pake.
=eyefloater
I only dropped the names I needed to. Columbus indicates the quality of the steel--arguably the best. Campy and Cinelli indicate the quality of the components--also the best. If it were a track bike made out of cro mo or hi ten with ****ty parts it'd be a different story. If I was dropping names I would have told you what the manufacturer of the frame is, cause it is collectible, but I find the frame material and parts more important than who exactly made it, as long as the manufacturer knew what they were doing.. But what exactly I got doesn't matter as far as this topic is concerned.
And btw, it's not a fluke, I have two track bikes both columbus one high end parts one mid end parts both cases $250.
And oh yeah, both of them are 54 CM, ideal track size for my body. I don't reach too far on either of these bikes, and yeah, it does handle sweet. It's zippy and fun and I'm thrilled about it, you cynical bastards*.
*you does not necessarily mean you.
depends... you can always find good deals, i got my pake frame for $200 and a $20 fork. now find me a nice steel track frame for under $220.
=eyefloater
Way to name drop. With all those well known brand names your bike must handle great and fit your perfectly!
And btw, it's not a fluke, I have two track bikes both columbus one high end parts one mid end parts both cases $250.
And oh yeah, both of them are 54 CM, ideal track size for my body. I don't reach too far on either of these bikes, and yeah, it does handle sweet. It's zippy and fun and I'm thrilled about it, you cynical bastards*.
*you does not necessarily mean you.
#25
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Imperial Beach, CA
Posts: 705
Bikes: GT Pulse Track, 93 Bridgestone XO-1 & 93 RB-1, Ritchey Swiss Cross, Ritchey Road Logic, Yoshi Konno/3Rensho Specialized Allez, Cannondale Slate, Cannondale SuperSix EVO/Disc and Cannondale Hooligan
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 39 Post(s)
Liked 143 Times
in
50 Posts
Originally Posted by deathhare
I wouldnt be caught within 100 feet of anything that GT made.
really?
not even their 853 reynolds track frames?
yet your considering one of the cheapest wannabe fixed gear framesets?