Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   Why not use a backpack? (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/236095-why-not-use-backpack.html)

carleton 10-10-06 08:15 PM

Why not use a backpack?
 
This is more for the noobs I guess than anyone else:

To start off, I have a thing for bags/backpacks/messenger bags/etc. I own all kinds and several versions of each. But, I find that when riding my backpacks gets way more use than my messenger bags.

I'm not trying to start a posenger or style debate. I'm just talking pragmatically. For me, backpacks get the job done. In the past couple of years, my Chrome Metropolis has seen more time on airplanes as carry-on baggage than on my bicycle.

With all the bag messenger bag threads out there by usually non-messengers, I keep asking myself, "Why don't they just use a backpack?"

Here are a few reasons:
So much more research and development has gone into backpack materials, design, features
Many backpacks now come with laptop sleves/sections already
Some backpacks feature Hydration systems
Backpacks come in many different sizes (more than messenger bags)
Messenger bags are designed to be accessible without removing it. (not really a requirement for me cruising around or commuting)
Messenger bags are generally huge to hold a lot of stuff (but smaller ones are available)
It's easier for me to organize stuff in backpacks than messenger bags
Backpacks are much cheaper and much more available than messenger bags
You probably already have one
So, for those interested in bags, before you drop $100 on that new messenger bag, consider a backpack.

eddiebrannan 10-10-06 08:21 PM

most non bike-specific backpacks are designed for upright centre of gravity, not for leaned-over bike position

roughrider504 10-10-06 08:23 PM

It really depends on who you are asking. On a bike, I like a messenger bag much more when carrying alot of things, because I can get it higher on my back. With a light load, its almost the same. I dont buy the expensive bags either. I have one i got for free, and another one I bought for cheap. If you make padding for the strap [old tubes acually work well] the cheap ones are pretty comfortable. I am thinking of making my own bag, so I can have a few of diffrent sizes for dirt cheap.

operator 10-10-06 08:27 PM


I'm not trying to start a posenger or style debate. I'm just talking pragmatically. For me, backpacks get the job done for me.
Good for you. Point?

carleton 10-10-06 08:31 PM


Originally Posted by operator
Good for you. Point?

The point is here:


Originally Posted by carleton
So, for those interested in bags, before you drop $100 on that new messenger bag, consider a backpack.


cassette 10-10-06 08:34 PM

i rock an ortlieb. ****in dope!

marqueemoon 10-10-06 08:37 PM

Depends on what/how much you have to carry. With a larger messenger bag you're usually ready for just about anything. I've carried a lot of weird **** that would never fit in a backpack, not even my black hole-capacity Ortleib.

xthugmurderx 10-10-06 08:39 PM

i wish i would have had a backpack while messengering. that should would have been awesome. sure, you'd have to take it all the way off (OH NO!) when you need to get something out, but it's more comfortable, and better on your shoulder over time. you guys that aren't messengers try carrying 120 pounds in two copy boxes a few block with an over the shoulder bag. that **** KILLS. and remember kids...messenger bags are for messengering. not carrying schoolbooks.

iloveboston 10-10-06 08:43 PM

i use a large freight baggage backpack for work, and its held more than any sling style bag ive had ever could (chrome kremlin/ xxl bailey works). ive had it full with 2 copy boxes and a few stuffed manila envelopes with it and it was comfortable. after riding with this bag, i wouldnt go back to a sling bag.

Griffin 10-10-06 08:47 PM


Originally Posted by xthugmurderx
i wish i would have had a backpack while messengering. that should would have been awesome. sure, you'd have to take it all the way off (OH NO!) when you need to get something out, but it's more comfortable, and better on your shoulder over time. you guys that aren't messengers try carrying 120 pounds in two copy boxes a few block with an over the shoulder bag. that **** KILLS. and remember kids...messenger bags are for messengering. not carrying schoolbooks.

haha i ride with it and use it for school. eh, it works.

PIZZ 10-10-06 08:55 PM

I use both, backpacks i like better actually

pedex 10-10-06 09:00 PM

find me a decent backpack that will hold 3500 cubic inches or 50lbs and is easy to get inside, to ride with, almost waterproof, and comfortable loaded down and I will use one---other than the messenger specific backpacks good luck satisfying these needs..........and a regular messenger bag still works better

Monument Man 10-10-06 09:01 PM

i sweat with backpacks

the messenger bag can be moved to a new location on my back to allow for maximum circulation.

marqueemoon 10-10-06 09:08 PM


Originally Posted by xthugmurderx
i wish i would have had a backpack while messengering. that should would have been awesome. sure, you'd have to take it all the way off (OH NO!) when you need to get something out, but it's more comfortable, and better on your shoulder over time. you guys that aren't messengers try carrying 120 pounds in two copy boxes a few block with an over the shoulder bag. that **** KILLS. and remember kids...messenger bags are for messengering. not carrying schoolbooks.

That's what cargo trailers are for.

piratelove 10-10-06 09:16 PM


Originally Posted by cassette
i rock an ortlieb. ****in dope!


You like it? I think I'm gonna get one this weekend.....

PIZZ 10-10-06 09:18 PM


Originally Posted by pedex
find me a decent backpack that will hold 3500 cubic inches or 50lbs and is easy to get inside, to ride with, almost waterproof, and comfortable loaded down and I will use one---other than the messenger specific backpacks good luck satisfying these needs..........and a regular messenger bag still works better


http://www.chromebags.com/sultan.php

pedex 10-10-06 09:33 PM

^^its only 2475 cubic inches, way too small

most backpacks are small, heck, my messenger bag is bigger than my backpacking backpack I use for 3-5 day trips into the woods

zip22 10-10-06 09:40 PM


Originally Posted by pedex
find me a decent backpack that will hold 3500 cubic inches or 50lbs and is easy to get inside, to ride with, almost waterproof, and comfortable loaded down and I will use one---other than the messenger specific backpacks good luck satisfying these needs..........and a regular messenger bag still works better

http://www.rei.com/online/store/Prod...ory_rn=4500572

not sure about riding, though ;)

pedex 10-10-06 09:47 PM


Originally Posted by zip22

ya, cant have a hip strap like that, makes it very uncomfortable or impossible to ride

if you like backpacks, wear one, if you want to haul lots of stuff and do it all the time, you arent going to beat a messenger bag, just the way it is

xthugmurderx 10-10-06 10:18 PM

**** chrome..get a reload backback. the big one. and i didn't have nor do i now have a cargo trailer. part of being a messenger is sacking up to get what needs to be done done. and i realize that the last sentence in my above post could have sounded not like i meant it...i meant that more to the kids that complain that straps don't break in fast enough.

hyperRevue 10-10-06 10:20 PM


Originally Posted by xthugmurderx
part of being a messenger is sacking up to get what needs to be done done.


You wanna tell that to the Breakaway kids who use the cargo trailer? ;)

xthugmurderx 10-10-06 10:22 PM

if they have it that's great, but if they don't, you gotta step up.

12XU 10-10-06 10:28 PM

There's no shame in a cargo bike/trailer. If you take your messenger job seriously and plan on being efficient for years to come, a long john/cargo-trailer equipped bike with disc brakes and 7-9 speeds in the back and two chainrings in the front is probably the best you can get.

Also, to Carleton. Most of the cheapie backpacks are hardly waterproof, sit awfully while riding (i.e. craning one's neck is nigh impossible when the bag rests high on one's back), and have little to no padding which makes for some painful loads if not packed perfectly. I think some of the messenger-specific backpacks out there are totally awesome (Freight, Ortlieb, Chrome, Reload, Seagull all look like good options), but they're going to be as expensive or moreso than a standard messenger bag.

blu3d0g 10-10-06 10:57 PM

I've found with backpacks that even a lot of the expensive ones aren't waterproof, just somewhat water resistant, and require you to buy a seperate rain cover for another $20. I can't lose built in waterproof.

dogpound 10-10-06 11:23 PM

most bags are just too big for my body, forget what they can carry.
and messenger bags are terrible for my shoulders.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.