I hate myself for starting a Mark V fit thread
#1
/\/\ \/\/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nope
Posts: 274
Bikes: 2007 Trek 6000, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I hate myself for starting a Mark V fit thread
...but I'm ordering tonight and I need a really quick answer. Here's the deal:
I'm going to try and order a Mark V tonight, and I can't decide between the 59cm and the 56cm.
My stats:
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 150 lb
Inseam: 33"
Torso (crotch to top of head): 40"
Age: 20
Riding experience: Almost exclusively MTB 'till this year, and as such I really prefer a more upright position. A handlebar drop of more than 5" or so would make me pretty uncomfortable. I usually have my stems dialed up about an inch above the "minimum insertion" mark. (!?) I'll probably be using the bike for recreational long-ish rides and commuting. It may see a velodrome once in its life, just for the experience, but that's it. I prefer a light and twitchy feel, for what its worth. I'll probably put bullhorns on there too.
This is a pic of my old bike, dialed up the way I like it:
I think the red line is what is meant by "center-to-center" right?
Notice the saddle is moved as far forward as possible. It still felt like I was a always sitting on the narrow tip of the saddle, like the TT was too long or something. The bike pictured is billed as a 59cm.
Here's the geometry of the Mark V: (or go here: https://irocycle.com/iro/index.php?ma...&products_id=6)
So, in the fg/ss forum's collective expert opinion...which Mark V size suits me, 56 or 59? I don't mind really jacked up seat posts or extreme combinations of headset spacers/weird stems.
I'm going to try and order a Mark V tonight, and I can't decide between the 59cm and the 56cm.
My stats:
Height: 6'1"
Weight: 150 lb
Inseam: 33"
Torso (crotch to top of head): 40"
Age: 20
Riding experience: Almost exclusively MTB 'till this year, and as such I really prefer a more upright position. A handlebar drop of more than 5" or so would make me pretty uncomfortable. I usually have my stems dialed up about an inch above the "minimum insertion" mark. (!?) I'll probably be using the bike for recreational long-ish rides and commuting. It may see a velodrome once in its life, just for the experience, but that's it. I prefer a light and twitchy feel, for what its worth. I'll probably put bullhorns on there too.
This is a pic of my old bike, dialed up the way I like it:
I think the red line is what is meant by "center-to-center" right?
Notice the saddle is moved as far forward as possible. It still felt like I was a always sitting on the narrow tip of the saddle, like the TT was too long or something. The bike pictured is billed as a 59cm.
Here's the geometry of the Mark V: (or go here: https://irocycle.com/iro/index.php?ma...&products_id=6)
Code:
Size S/T T/T S/T H/T H/T Wheel B/B C/S Stand c-c length angle angle length Base Drop Length Over 50cm 46 cm 52 cm 72.0° 75.0° 10 cm 95cm 5 cm 39.1 cm 29.5" 53cm 49 cm 54 cm 72.0° 73.0° 10 cm 95.7 cm 5 cm 39.1 cm 30" 56cm 52 cm 55.5 cm 73.0° 73.0° 12.5 cm 96 cm 5 cm 39.1 cm 31" 59cm 55 cm 57 cm 74.0° 73.0° 15 cm 96.6 cm 5 cm 39.1 cm 32" 62cm 58 cm 59 cm 75.0° 73.0° 17.8 cm 97.5 cm 5 cm 39.1 cm 33.5"
#2
Geek Extraordinaire
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 1,769
Bikes: Bianchi Advantage Fixed Conversion; Specialized Stumpjumper FS Hardtail
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
For longer rides you want a bigger frame. You're about my size, though skinnier, and I ride a 58-59. If you get the smaller bike, you'll end up with a big drop from the saddle to bars, so you'll need a really long stem. If you go for the bigger bike, it will be much easier to get the bars just under or even with the saddle. If you get the 56, you'll have a huge amount of seatpost showing, and need a really long stem to bring the bars up where you like them. The bigger bike will allow you to run the stem lower, making for a better feeling and looking bike. Since the mark v is threadless, running 4 or 5 inches of threadless spacers will make the frame feel kinda noodley.
Also, the tracks around here don't really consider the mark v a "track bike," and usually won't let you on the track with it.
Also, the tracks around here don't really consider the mark v a "track bike," and usually won't let you on the track with it.
__________________
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Sintesi Conversion Serotta Track
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.
Sintesi Conversion Serotta Track
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Somerville, MA
Posts: 104
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
59cm!
That has the 55cm seat tube, center to center and a 57cm top, center to center. It'll be just a teeny bit bigger than what you have now.
I am 6'3" with a 34" inseam and I ride the 62cm....
That has the 55cm seat tube, center to center and a 57cm top, center to center. It'll be just a teeny bit bigger than what you have now.
I am 6'3" with a 34" inseam and I ride the 62cm....
#4
/\/\ \/\/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nope
Posts: 274
Bikes: 2007 Trek 6000, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by sivat
Also, the tracks around here don't really consider the mark v a "track bike," and usually won't let you on the track with it.
Any concern about the fact I had my saddle brought all the way forward and it still felt a little uncomfortable (like I was sitting on the tip of the saddle all the time)? I don't know what the deal was about that...
#5
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
59 for sure. Remember you can get seat posts with no offset, give you some adjustment range in the area you like.
What is the bike in the pic? Probably something obvious, but I don't know it. Those dropouts look like you beat up a bmx kid and cut them off his bike with a torch (that's a compliment, unless that's actually how it happened)
What is the bike in the pic? Probably something obvious, but I don't know it. Those dropouts look like you beat up a bmx kid and cut them off his bike with a torch (that's a compliment, unless that's actually how it happened)
#6
/\/\ \/\/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nope
Posts: 274
Bikes: 2007 Trek 6000, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Ha, yeah its a very low-end (I was going to say ****ty but realized that would be in poor taste as the BikesDirect people read this board a lot) BikesDirect bike, a "Dawes" Lightning SST. She rode pretty decently, really, a good cheap beater, and the hideous track ends were sort of a built in theft-deterent.
Sadly, her wheel base was permanently shortened by about 4 inches last month, when I ran into a Civic.
Sadly, her wheel base was permanently shortened by about 4 inches last month, when I ran into a Civic.
#7
THIS SPACE FOR RENT
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,849
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Heh, I actually looked on the bikesdirect site, but I guess they aren't doing this model this week. I'd seriously like to run through a pile of BMX frames with those dropouts and see what they actually are, they're so burly and awesome.
#8
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nouia
Really? That sucks.
Any concern about the fact I had my saddle brought all the way forward and it still felt a little uncomfortable (like I was sitting on the tip of the saddle all the time)? I don't know what the deal was about that...
Any concern about the fact I had my saddle brought all the way forward and it still felt a little uncomfortable (like I was sitting on the tip of the saddle all the time)? I don't know what the deal was about that...
edit: let us know what you end up getting. also, is there a reason why you are in such a rush? you'd be better off putting more thought into the size you really want instead of rushing.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 109
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
59 cm - absolutely -I think IRO's are BIG for their frame size - I am 6'0 and just got a 57cm (BB to CENTER TT) Lemond Filmore, and it is perfect (seat tube right in the middle). Go 59, worst case talk to Tony - from what I hear he will make it alright...
Last edited by wildbird; 12-21-06 at 11:30 PM.
#10
/\/\ \/\/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nope
Posts: 274
Bikes: 2007 Trek 6000, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by vinnydelnegro
not that i speak with any authority, but the fact that you have the seat all the way forward and still feel like you are on the tip might mean that you're top tube/stem gives you too much reach. where do you usually place your hands? tops, hoods, drops? it could also mean that the seat is a bad fit for you.
edit: let us know what you end up getting. also, is there a reason why you are in such a rush? you'd be better off putting more thought into the size you really want instead of rushing.
edit: let us know what you end up getting. also, is there a reason why you are in such a rush? you'd be better off putting more thought into the size you really want instead of rushing.
[Oh, and I'm not in a rush, that was sort of just a ploy to get a lot of responses in a short time. Don't tell anyone though.]
#11
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Denver
Posts: 470
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Nouia
I'm usually on the hoods or on the tops. What does "too much reach" mean? I'm not too familiar with the term.
[Oh, and I'm not in a rush, that was sort of just a ploy to get a lot of responses in a short time. Don't tell anyone though.]
[Oh, and I'm not in a rush, that was sort of just a ploy to get a lot of responses in a short time. Don't tell anyone though.]
at the end of the day though, bike fit is totally subjective. i'm still trying to figure out what i like. i'm 5'6" and got a 51cm Mercian a few months ago. I love how it feels, but now I want to try and even smaller bike to see if i can handle the drop.
#13
jack of one or two trades
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640
Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I can't believe I'm the first to suggest a 56? If your current bike has a 56.8 TT and the Mark V in a 59 has a 57, wouldn't that make it even bigger than the current bike, which is already too big? Go for the 56, and just leave a few spacers on the fork. You might get used to saddle-bar drop once you sit on the right part of the saddle too.
#14
:jarckass:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Aeroplane
If your current bike has a 56.8 TT and the Mark V in a 59 has a 57, wouldn't that make it even bigger than the current bike, which is already too big?
#15
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
A few things - I wouldn't go w/ the 56, but the next size up.
A larger frame size will have a taller head tube which will let you bring the bars up a bit without relying on so many spacer stacks. It can get sketchy if you use too many but you're not in that neighbourhood yet. It would be nicer aesthetically, for whatever that's worth. I would just use a slightly shorter stem.
Your seat tube is on an angle (obviously) ... as the seatpost goes up, the saddle goes back. With the larger frame size it won't go back so far and won't screw up the fit around the saddle>cranks ... which looks really awkward right now. You should bribe a local bike shop w/ a 6-pack to do a fitting session with you and try to make you more comfortable.
If you feel too stretched out but everything seems in proportion to your torso and egs, maybe try some bars w/ less drop or reach. I'm a huge fan of shallow drops just because most of the time they're much more comfortable and if I really need to get aero I can drop my elbows - done.
A larger frame size will have a taller head tube which will let you bring the bars up a bit without relying on so many spacer stacks. It can get sketchy if you use too many but you're not in that neighbourhood yet. It would be nicer aesthetically, for whatever that's worth. I would just use a slightly shorter stem.
Your seat tube is on an angle (obviously) ... as the seatpost goes up, the saddle goes back. With the larger frame size it won't go back so far and won't screw up the fit around the saddle>cranks ... which looks really awkward right now. You should bribe a local bike shop w/ a 6-pack to do a fitting session with you and try to make you more comfortable.
If you feel too stretched out but everything seems in proportion to your torso and egs, maybe try some bars w/ less drop or reach. I'm a huge fan of shallow drops just because most of the time they're much more comfortable and if I really need to get aero I can drop my elbows - done.
#16
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: baltimore
Posts: 1,663
Bikes: Pake Track; Bianchi XL EV2 El Reparto Corse, Kona Jake the Snake
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I am with Aeroplane on this one. Get the 56. Bikes that are too big suck.
#17
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Standover height is one thing (they're measured c-c on the IRO site, take note) but too much saddle-to-pedal drop sucks more. You mentioned you're planning on using bullhorns ... that'll change the stem length of choice slightly but for longer rides drops really are superior (riding into headwinds comes to mind). On a vaguely related note, your saddle position (angle) looks way off too. That can cause you to slide forward and and up in ass hatchet mode all the time.
</$0.02>
</$0.02>
#18
suffering...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: EAST VILLAGE, NYC
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAPO, 2004 Look 468SL, CAAD 8, IRO MV, IRO bfssfg, 80's Panasonic x2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Well, I'm almost (6'2") the exact same size as you and I bought the Mark V in 56. I can't Imagine trying to ride a 59 as would would be way too big. You can always dial it in longer but you can't make a bigger frame smaller.
#20
suffering...
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: EAST VILLAGE, NYC
Posts: 1,049
Bikes: 2009 Cannondale CAPO, 2004 Look 468SL, CAAD 8, IRO MV, IRO bfssfg, 80's Panasonic x2
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
There's about 2 cm of clearence in front of my toes. I ride a 165mm crank. Shoe size is 11 1/2.
#21
:jarckass:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by geist
Well, I'm almost (6'2") the exact same size as you and I bought the Mark V in 56. I can't Imagine trying to ride a 59 as would would be way too big. You can always dial it in longer but you can't make a bigger frame smaller.
Last edited by deathhare; 12-21-06 at 08:16 PM.
#22
/\/\ \/\/
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Nope
Posts: 274
Bikes: 2007 Trek 6000, others
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by geist
Well, I'm almost (6'2") the exact same size as you and I bought the Mark V in 56. I can't Imagine trying to ride a 59 as would would be way too big. You can always dial it in longer but you can't make a bigger frame smaller.
#23
:jarckass:
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 6,562
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Originally Posted by Nouia
This is a longshot, but do you happen to have any pics floating around on your hard drive of you actually on the bike? Or if not, just the bike itself, dialed up the way you like it? It would be tremendously helpful just to see what a 56cm Mark V looks like with a 6'2" rider....I'm leaning towards 56cm at the moment.
#24
Senior Member
I am a tad over 6" and I ride a 53 cm tt surly, I previously rode a 59cm schwinn and I by far like the smaller fit, you can get the bike set up to suite your riding style easy enough with some playing around.
#25
Don't smoke, Mike.
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,295
Bikes: Devinci Tosca, IRO Rob Roy
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Okay, since I'm apparently the only one trapped in the Twilight Zone here can some of you 6'+ guys post pics of your 53-56cm bikes so I can see how this possibly works well?