2007 Surly Steamroller Complete
01-18-08, 07:03 PM
#51
end of biters
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Lansing
Posts: 833
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by bonechilling
I think the Steamroller is ugmo. The only thing that makes it worthwhile is it's alleged versatility. Otherwise, $400 for a Cro-Mo frame and fork is kinda stupid.
01-18-08, 08:47 PM
#52
god
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: SFC
Posts: 411
Bikes: cannondale f300, surly steamroller
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by curiousincident
why not spend 300 on a Mark V Pro
2) surly has reputation for tank-like construction
3) fat tire clearance
in any event, mark v and steamroller are both awesome bikes. steamroller is my personal preference, seeing as I own and cherish one. ill post pics soon.
also, in answer to the fender question from above, the sks race blades work great on this frame for anyone who is curious.
01-18-08, 11:32 PM
#53
Newbie
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 1
Bikes: Steamroller
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My Steamroller has held up pretty well. You honestly can't go wrong with their complete bike purchase deal.
