Does Sheldon recommend biopace ...
#1
Full Member
Thread Starter
Does Sheldon recommend biopace ...
...chainrings for fixed gear bikes? I recall he wrote something but can't quite remember if he was a biospace proponent. Not incidentally, I put one (44t) on my bike yesterday and rode it around the block. No problems, though I haven't figured out (yet) how it's going to help. The ring looks cool nonetheless.
Anyway, just wondering if I'm doing myself any favors with this new chainring.
Anyway, just wondering if I'm doing myself any favors with this new chainring.
#2
crotchety young dude
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SF, CA
Posts: 4,818
Bikes: IRO Angus; Casati Gold Line; Redline 925; '72 Schwinn Olympic Paramount
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
There are claims that it's good for the knees, and yes it can work on a fixed gear.
#3
70mm4$!n!
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: DC
Posts: 1,757
Bikes: Sworks E5, ritte Bosberg
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sheldon is a biopace proponent if there ever was one, check out his bikes and you will see biopaces on almost every bike
#4
Full Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by freeskihp
sheldon is a biopace proponent if there ever was one, check out his bikes and you will see biopaces on almost every bike
Thanks.
#5
King of the Hipsters
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bend, Oregon
Posts: 2,128
Bikes: Realm Cycles Custom
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
I ride biopace.
It helps on hills and I can spin a little faster.
Strangely, a biopace feels "rounder" than a round ring.
Shimano might have meant a 44t biopace ring as a middle or inner ring on a multi-chainring geared bike.
If so, Daveed might consider flipping the ring over so the chainring bolt countersinks go up against the crank star.
Biopace rings have a "direction," and, if an inner ring (sounds like it), this will correctly orient the ring.
I ride with my 42t biopace ring oriented this way, and it works great.
By the way, having the countersinks against the star gives more room around the chainring bolts for centering the chainring.
Taking extra time to center the chainring lets me tighten the chain more, so that it gets almost tight at the tight places and not too slack at the slack places.
The tightest place should occur with the top pedal at about the 12:30 or 1:00 position, a little ahead of the seat tube.
It helps on hills and I can spin a little faster.
Strangely, a biopace feels "rounder" than a round ring.
Shimano might have meant a 44t biopace ring as a middle or inner ring on a multi-chainring geared bike.
If so, Daveed might consider flipping the ring over so the chainring bolt countersinks go up against the crank star.
Biopace rings have a "direction," and, if an inner ring (sounds like it), this will correctly orient the ring.
I ride with my 42t biopace ring oriented this way, and it works great.
By the way, having the countersinks against the star gives more room around the chainring bolts for centering the chainring.
Taking extra time to center the chainring lets me tighten the chain more, so that it gets almost tight at the tight places and not too slack at the slack places.
The tightest place should occur with the top pedal at about the 12:30 or 1:00 position, a little ahead of the seat tube.
#6
Gone, but not forgotten
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Newtonville, Massachusetts
Posts: 2,301
Bikes: See: https://sheldonbrown.org/bicycles
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 24 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 6 Times
in
5 Posts
Originally Posted by Ken Cox
Shimano might have meant a 44t biopace ring as a middle or inner ring on a multi-chainring geared bike.
Originally Posted by Ken Cox
If so, Daveed might consider flipping the ring over so the chainring bolt countersinks go up against the crank star. [spider]
Sheldon " https://sheldonbrown.com/biopace " Brown
#8
Full Member
Thread Starter
Originally Posted by cosmo starr
i dont like the way biopace look when they are spinning...the chain flapping and all.
#9
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: by a big river
Posts: 2,459
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm going to give this a try. Question: I have a 42 tooth biopace ring. It will be mounted on the inside of a double crank. Which side of the bike should the writing on the ring be visible from?
#10
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by MKRG
I'm going to give this a try. Question: I have a 42 tooth biopace ring. It will be mounted on the inside of a double crank. Which side of the bike should the writing on the ring be visible from?
#12
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by MKRG
Biopace are not round and they are "directional", so...yes.
Honest question, Sheldon only says this about mounting:
For installing Biopace chainrings, the orientation should generally be preserved. Each Biopace chainring has an "indexing mark." This is a small tab pointing inward toward the middle of the chainring.
#13
如果你能讀了這個你講中文
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Because the biopace makes it easy in one part and hard in the other. If you dont preserve direction, you may make it hard in the part of the pedal stroke that is already hard.
But on a fixed gear, your feet should always be tightly strapped to the pedals. I love biopace for platform pedals, on bikes where you need a bit of help to get through the weak spots in the stroke. On a fixed, it is rather silly.
But on a fixed gear, your feet should always be tightly strapped to the pedals. I love biopace for platform pedals, on bikes where you need a bit of help to get through the weak spots in the stroke. On a fixed, it is rather silly.
#14
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
Originally Posted by genericbikedude
Because the biopace makes it easy in one part and hard in the other. If you dont preserve direction, you may make it hard in the part of the pedal stroke that is already hard.
#15
Banned
Join Date: May 2005
Location: GA
Posts: 5,317
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Originally Posted by genericbikedude
Because the biopace makes it easy in one part and hard in the other. If you dont preserve direction, you may make it hard in the part of the pedal stroke that is already hard.
But on a fixed gear, your feet should always be tightly strapped to the pedals. I love biopace for platform pedals, on bikes where you need a bit of help to get through the weak spots in the stroke. On a fixed, it is rather silly.
But on a fixed gear, your feet should always be tightly strapped to the pedals. I love biopace for platform pedals, on bikes where you need a bit of help to get through the weak spots in the stroke. On a fixed, it is rather silly.
#16
如果你能讀了這個你講中文
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 3,542
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
AFAIK they are not perfectly eliptical, but rather a warped elipse. There is also suntour's OvalTech. Far cooler, IMHO. Both used some form of complex analysis to figure out where the radius should be larger, and where lower. I think it is more complicated than just a simple oval.
#17
domestique
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: off the back
Posts: 2,005
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'd say Sheldon is a Biopace user. Yes, I read that he has used it on fixed gear bikes. I'd stop short of saying he "recommends" it for the general cycling population. I've never seen him do that.
There are some aspects of my bikes that I enjoy, but would never recommend to others because I realize it isn't very mainstream and most people wouldn't care for it.
There are some aspects of my bikes that I enjoy, but would never recommend to others because I realize it isn't very mainstream and most people wouldn't care for it.
#18
B.C. to D.C.
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: between the Popeye's, the liquor store, the funeral home, and the strip club
Posts: 576
Bikes: 1992 Miyata Nine 14; 1971 Raleigh Super Course fixie conversion; 2006 Jamis Nova (853 version); 2001 Diamondback Topanga (SS conversion); 1956 Rudge Sports; 1971 Raleigh Competition (processing); 199? Schwinn World Sport (processing)
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I used a 42t biopace. While I loved the pedaling it provided, I certainly did not like the chain falling off when the BB flexed too much and gouging the crap out of my chainstays. got a 43t round dura ace ring, and nary a chain dropped since.
#19
Mo' Senior
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 371
Bikes: 1984 Norco Monterey SL (Ishwata 3X butted), matte black, 42-15 fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
The chain tension shouldn't vary at all with the 'right' biopace rings (1st generation I believe). Sheldon addresses this in length, but the short of it is one generation of biopace works great, others give you tension issues. I believe the OvalTechs are also a no go. I'd have to do some more digging ... Anyways, try it. If you get more than normal variations in tension, it's probably best to go back to round chainrings.
#20
...addicted...
This came up on a thread in the commuting forum too. I've got a 42t biopace chainring that I'd like to try out... but how do I tell if it's 1st generation? Where would you suggest digging SSS? I've done the biopace search for this forum to come up with a quote for the commuters, but didn't turn up anything more useful than: yes, it sometimes works well, and Sheldon does reccomend them.
or, I suppose I could just try it and see that way. Time to tinker!
or, I suppose I could just try it and see that way. Time to tinker!
#21
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 349
Bikes: 1970s Gazelle 10 spd -- Cheap 1980s no-name conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
From my experience, the Ovaltechs will NOT give an even chain tension. I built a single speed for my wife on a bike that came with a 42 tooth Ovaltech as the inner ring. At one point of the rotation, it would be bordering on completely binding the chainring, while at another point it would be so slack that you could see the chain bouncing around. Currently, I'm running a chain tensioner on them, and you can see the range that the arm has to cover as she peddles the bike.
#22
Mo' Senior
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Ottawa, ON
Posts: 371
Bikes: 1984 Norco Monterey SL (Ishwata 3X butted), matte black, 42-15 fixed
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Hmm ... I can't find any information about the generations at this point. I'm not sure where I read that. Best bet is to give it a try. Sounds like you've got it working at this stage. Good on ya.
If you've got old biopace, your only option is probably to just try it. I am of no help.
If you've got old biopace, your only option is probably to just try it. I am of no help.