Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Anyone go to shorter cranks and like them?

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Anyone go to shorter cranks and like them?

Old 07-11-07, 08:14 AM
  #1  
Nice Guy
Thread Starter
 
Idunno445's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Anyone go to shorter cranks and like them?

About 9 months ago I built a fixed gear conversion. For more cornering clearance, I put 165s on even though my "nice bike" has 170s. I thought it was going to be a compromise and I was going to have to live with it, but wouldn't like it. I have a 30" inseam.

Now I've found that I like the short cranks. I like the feeling of spinning with them. Part of that might be the differences in pedaling a fixed gear, but even when I flip my hub to the ss side, spinning feels great. In fact, when my two bikes are at approximately the same gear ratio, it seems easier to cruise with the shorter cranks.

So now I'm considering swapping out my cranks on my other bike to 165s and I'm just curious, anyone go to shorter cranks and then realize they prefer them?

Nick
__________________
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)

I'd rather be riding...
Idunno445 is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 08:19 AM
  #2  
in ur ____, ___ing ur ___
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 189

Bikes: IRO Mark V

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just installed a 165s yesterday, and the difference was immediately noticable and spinning was much easier than on my stupidlong 175s
disconnec is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 08:21 AM
  #3  
Beercycle!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i put 140 bulletproofs on my iro last week and i think theyre great. At first i felt a huge difference, but its all ive been riding for a week and it just feels natural now. Its much better for the knees and i can corner like a madman (no pedal strike).
doctorofpueter is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 08:23 AM
  #4  
in ur ____, ___ing ur ___
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 189

Bikes: IRO Mark V

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
140s, jebus. ...

I noticed that shorter cranks are easier on my knees, too. If my knee trouble keeps up, maybe I'll give crazy short cranks a shot.
disconnec is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 08:29 AM
  #5  
Beercycle!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
as long as you keep your gain ratio the same the switch could be quite beneficial
doctorofpueter is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 08:29 AM
  #6  
jack of one or two trades
 
Aeroplane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Suburbia, CT
Posts: 5,640

Bikes: Old-ass gearie hardtail MTB, fix-converted Centurion LeMans commuter, SS hardtail monster MTB

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I love the 165's on my fix, but I went down to 170's on my MTB, and it's not much fun. I lost a lot of leverage.
Aeroplane is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 09:14 AM
  #7  
oldsprinter
 
oldsprinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 935
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I went to 165s on my road bike and went compact - shorter cranks and lower gears are a great combination. I think my knees will thank me for it in 30 years.

Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.


On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.

Ride what feels good.
oldsprinter is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 11:54 AM
  #8  
tarck bike.com exile
 
666pack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: lancaster, pennsylvania
Posts: 2,058

Bikes: bfssfg iro--black.

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
140? damn.

i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
666pack is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 12:53 PM
  #9  
Beercycle!
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 666pack
140? damn.

i'm real tall (6'6") so i don't like going with 165s cause i feel like a clown spinning that fast.
im 5'11"
doctorofpueter is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 01:03 PM
  #10  
PKF
 
jankon73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 52

Bikes: Cannondale R700, Cannondale Scalpel, Fuji Royale II, Surly Steamroller, Giant OCR2, G.T. Avalanche 2.0, Red Motobecane, Echo

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ditto on the 140's.
I'm 6' tall and I know it's odd. But it works!
jankon73 is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 01:16 PM
  #11  
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
after riding a bike with 170mm cranks on it exclusively, i put 165mm cranks on a nicer bike. the difference was astounding, especially when i'm all hunkered down in the drops. it really helped my comfort and fit on the bike, and since i ride a lower gear on that bike, having the shorter cranks helps my spin. also i'm short.
queerpunk is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 01:25 PM
  #12  
Nice Guy
Thread Starter
 
Idunno445's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 94
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well its nice to know that I'm not the only one who wonders about the length of the cranks the the bike industry chooses to put on stock bikes.

Some 165s sure sound nice... as a bonus, Nashbar is having a 20% off sale right now.....
__________________
'06 Zurich
'81 (or is it an '82?) Univega Sportour (fixie conversion)

I'd rather be riding...
Idunno445 is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 01:27 PM
  #13  
.
 
blickblocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 3,860
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm not really sure how I feel about my 165's. There's a smaller circle you have to spin, so there's less arc on each of your joints. I think the short arms might give you incentive to sit and spin rather than stand and mash like you're on a stairmaster, but on a SS/FG you don't really have a choice uphills.
__________________
https://blicksbags.com/
blickblocks is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 01:31 PM
  #14  
Senior Member
 
Morgie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 779
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've got 165 sugino's an I like em'.....
Morgie is offline  
Old 07-11-07, 02:44 PM
  #15  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: northern Florida, USA
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I rode 170s all my life, then got a Bianchi San Jose with 172.5 cranks. I swapped them for 165s and really like it. I usually ride it SS, not FG. I'm (almost) 5'11" with long legs/short torso, if that matters. For my group buy IRO I'm going to use some old Shimano 600 cranks that I have in my spares bin, but they're 170. I wonder how long it'll be before I'm looking for 165s to replace them.
dwainedibbly is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 03:23 PM
  #16  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
mirella bike

hello did you purchase the mirella bike???I am seeking to buy a mirella bike or frame please advise Peter
renuit is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 03:33 PM
  #17  
Just smang it.
 
EpicSchwinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,295

Bikes: Felt F1X, Trek 2300 Composite, Dawes Deadeye

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Peter. Whatever you do, don't buy the mirella bike. Buy a Kilo TT.

Also, don't google Mirella at work.
EpicSchwinn is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 03:37 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
RGNY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Utica,NY,USA
Posts: 1,520
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
170 to 165, couldn't be happier.....
RGNY is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 03:45 PM
  #19  
ceejay
 
CJWIZVRDGVNG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 215

Bikes: Mercier Kilo Deluxe

Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by EpicSchwinn
Also, don't google Mirella at work.
nice
CJWIZVRDGVNG is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:06 PM
  #20  
Ice Bites
 
Cycocross's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: cYa tossers
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've noticed the 175's help to build power and I like stretching out the stroke for an all day ride, but the 172.5 is quicker on race day and more responsive. I still can't believe 2 1/2 cents could make that big of difference but it does.
Cycocross is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:22 PM
  #21  
Veteran Racer
 
TejanoTrackie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ciudad de Vacas, Tejas
Posts: 11,760

Bikes: 32 frames + 80 wheels

Liked 771 Times in 434 Posts
165's on everything except my MTB's, which are 170's. Of course, I'm short with a 28" inseam, so it's like someone a foot taller running 175's. It's all relative to your leg length. If I could find some 160's with a 144mm bcd for the track, I'd get them.
__________________
What, Me Worry? - Alfred E. Neuman

Originally Posted by Dcv
I'd like to think i have as much money as brains.
I see the light at the end of the tunnel, but the tunnel keeps getting longer - me
TejanoTrackie is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:34 PM
  #22  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
165's on everything except my MTB's, which are 170's. Of course, I'm short with a 28" inseam, so it's like someone a foot taller running 175's. It's all relative to your leg length. If I could find some 160's with a 144mm bcd for the track, I'd get them.
yeah, 175s to me are like 160s to you. I used to ride 165s and currently have 170s on my fg, mainly because that's what I have. I had 170s on the touring bike for a while and it felt weird, I switched to 175 in heartbeat when I found the exact triple I wanted for dirt cheap. I supposed I got used to it on FG but it just felt wrong on the geared bike. Not enough knee flexion

Last edited by hairnet; 11-26-11 at 04:42 PM.
hairnet is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:54 PM
  #23  
Just smang it.
 
EpicSchwinn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Bellingham
Posts: 2,295

Bikes: Felt F1X, Trek 2300 Composite, Dawes Deadeye

Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Anybody go to posting in a thread from 2007 and like it?
EpicSchwinn is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 04:59 PM
  #24  
Fresh Garbage
 
hairnet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 13,190

Bikes: N+1

Liked 27 Times in 18 Posts
yeah boi

It's a relevant topic
hairnet is offline  
Old 11-26-11, 05:48 PM
  #25  
Elitist
 
carleton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 15,965
Liked 93 Times in 78 Posts
Originally Posted by oldsprinter
I went to 165s on my road bike and went compact - shorter cranks and lower gears are a great combination. I think my knees will thank me for it in 30 years.

Also, short cranks are stiffer, give quicker acceleration, tighter cornering.


On the track former world champion Claudio Gollinelli (see YouTube) rode 150mm cranks. Never stopped him winning races.

Ride what feels good.
+1
carleton is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Your Privacy Choices -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.