![]() |
Ot: Ot
OK. So when did we start with all of the Off Topic Topics?
Here you go, kiddies. Have fun: http://www.bikeforums.net/forumdisplay.php?f=198 |
they've always been there, some people have just started marking them.
don't much matter to me either way. |
About five minutes ago when you posted this one.
|
it makes a ton of sense. this forum has always been all over the place. this is a good way to self-regulate, so that people with chainline questions and frame questions don't learn about NYC cops or being pwned by professors.
|
Originally Posted by genericbikedude
(Post 5586505)
it makes a ton of sense. this forum has always been all over the place. this is a good way to self-regulate, so that people with chainline questions and frame questions don't learn about NYC cops or being pwned by professors.
|
To the contrary, professors and cops are the #1 enemy of fixed-gear riders everywhere, what with their "laws" and "standards of academic performance". Any threads on these issues are very on-topic.
Seriously though, the OT tags are nice. Maybe when it gets to the point where people see the entire first page of posts tagged OT they will realize that there is a reason the lounge exists. |
I wish the software let you flag threads as OT then you could remove them from the search function. Assuming people use the search function.
|
can't you just "-OT" in the search field?
edit: no. no you can't. for two reasons: 1. "ot" is only two characters long, which is ignored by the search function. 2. putting a "-" before something doesn't exclude it from search. |
|
i really like the song Cecilia by Simon & Garfunkel.
it's just got everything that's good about a song. breakdowns, two vocalists, sex, social commentary, humor, humour, hygiene, elements of ska. crazy melodic. burns my face off. u guyz should totallz checkit. |
I am not comfortable posting in foo. It is a bit to cult like. The "OT" convention seems like a good idea to me.
|
Originally Posted by joshuastar
(Post 5586638)
i really like the song Cecilia by Simon & Garfunkel.
it's just got everything that's good about a song. breakdowns, two vocalists, sex, social commentary, humor, humour, hygiene, elements of ska. crazy melodic. burns my face off. u guyz should totallz checkit. |
Originally Posted by wroomwroomoops
(Post 5586620)
|
Originally Posted by barba
(Post 5586659)
I am not comfortable posting in foo. It is a bit to cult like. The "OT" convention seems like a good idea to me.
|
|
I like it. Maybe now if someone has something off topic to say, people won't flame them quite so much for putting it on a bike-related forum. I have friends I know solely through biking--doesn't mean I only talk to them about bikes.
Good idea Cynikal had though, to find a way to exclude OT threads from searches. It seems unlikely that such a widely-used forum software would be that edit-able. |
this forums search function are crap. i cant believe google saves :(
/wrists |
Originally Posted by fetch
(Post 5587110)
this forums search function are crap. i cant believe google saves :(
/wrists |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.