![]() |
Originally Posted by Transfixed06
(Post 5978777)
is there a thread with pics of frames with 650 wheels on them? or can someone post some in this thread? i keep reading about these things, and would like to see what they look like on a track frame. thanks.
|
One thing that bears mentioning is that a lot of stayer's bikes (built for motorpacing) have sub-700c front wheels to get the rider deeper into the motorcycle or car's draft and hence to allow them to go faster. This may not be directly relevant to the op's question as I don't know whether these bikes have commonly used any of the 650 standard wheels.
|
Originally Posted by mander
(Post 5985691)
One thing that bears mentioning is that a lot of stayer's bikes (built for motorpacing) have sub-700c front wheels to get the rider deeper into the motorcycle or car's draft and hence to allow them to go faster. This may not be directly relevant to the op's question as I don't know whether these bikes have commonly used any of the 650 standard wheels.
|
This bike was designed around 650c wheels :
http://entirely-adequate.com/holland...ullholland.jpg No, seriously, no way a 700c wheel's gonna fit in there. http://entirely-adequate.com/holland/noclearance.jpg |
nice, that bike looks awesome
hows it ride with those bars. looks like your geos are similar to mine I almost dump my self on my face when ever i put my drops on mine http://stupidhurts.org/gallery/album...1/IMG_0069.JPG |
Your bike looks like it's a long toptube short seattube bike too, yeah.
Mine's something bizarre like 54x58, I think it may have been designed for a very tall orangutan. I run city bars because anything else is pretty much a torture rack for me. |
and i thought I had no fork clearance
mine is about 53x56 I think the guy at the lbs took a tape measure to it and shook his head my bike was meant to have aero bars and a shorter stem on it, and not drops, I have seen the bike in its original config. yours may have been designed for the same thing which is why it might feel funny mine doesnt handle right unless you are pretty much stretched out on top of it |
Using mismatched (i.e. - 700C rear, 650C front) is no longer UCI/USAC legal.
|
Originally Posted by ~Stuart~
(Post 5977971)
real men ride 650
Actually, real men ride 600c :eek: To be perfectly honest. This bike fell into my hands, and that is the ONLY reason that I have it. Most days I really wish I had a sweet high quality standard 700c front and rear, lugged steel bike with a front brake on it. This thing is cool looking (except perhaps for the erect stem), and actually is a really functional bike. Drop is about what my road bike has on the drops, BB is high so I have great corning clearance, AND I'm running 172.5 cranks with an inch or so of toe clearance. I just struggle with whether I should keep it sometimes when I think about having a fixed gear that didn't have a tubie on the front to worry about. Oh, and I AM a fan of brakes. -Jeremy http://i41.photobucket.com/albums/e2...edFixsmall.jpg |
Originally Posted by blickblocks
(Post 5977328)
It was originally intended for use with balloon-style tires, but some track racing team decided to use them with skinny tires on the track to tuck down further in a paceline. Slightly better for drafting, and that's about it.
|
the reason for a 650c front wheel is style .
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:35 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.