Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   bare knuckles (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/403089-bare-knuckles.html)

mihlbach 04-03-08 08:48 AM


Originally Posted by oadamy (Post 6453697)
agreed, and this is exactly the argument i was just going to start with mihlback.

I would have preferred the top-tube length of the 56 bareknuckle, but i couldn't stand over it. Should I have bought a bike i couldn't stand over just because it might fit better while riding? I don't think so.

Like you said, you do need to take more into account. If you look at two bikes with the same length seattubes C-C and horizontal top tubes, but one has a higher BB and a steeper ST angle, does one bike have a higher standover? Yes. And the bareknuckle has a higher standover than most people might expect it to, for a given size.

The seattube/top tube length proportions of the BK are not much different from many modern road frames. Naturally, the standover is a little higher, due to the raised BB, but this is minor. Sounds like you would have been better going with a different frame. There are lots of frames out there (IROs, Kilo TT, many others) that tend to have longer top tubes for a given seat tube and head tube length.

baxtefer 04-03-08 08:53 AM


Originally Posted by mihlbach (Post 6453529)
Thats because sizing a bike by its seat tube or standover is meaningless. How many times does this need to be stated?
People often report that the bareknuckles run large. They do not. A cm is a cm and my bareknuckle is exactly the claimed size for all the tube dimensions. It doesn't have an unusually high standover. My bareknuckle fits the same as all my other bikes, BECAUSE I BOUGHT THE CORRECT SIZE, IRRESPECTIVE OF HOW THE SEAT TUBE WAS MEASURED. The bareknuckle is sized c-c and it has a horizontal top tube. A 54 frame measured c-c is basically the same as a 56-60 measured c-t, depending on how high the seat tube extends from the frame. The 56/57s you have ridden were probably measured c-t and/or were some sort of compact geo virtual seat tube length. There's more to frame size than one number..you have to look at all the tube lengths, understand how they were measured, and the effects that the angles will have on size.

you've completely neglected BB height in your analysis.
BB height part of the reason why the "size your track bike 1-2cm smaller than your road bike" rule of thumb exists.

piwonka 04-03-08 08:54 AM

how often do you stand over your top tube with both feet flat on the ground. standover don't mean much. i'm worried about the toptube length first then the seattube length.

mihlbach 04-03-08 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by baxtefer (Post 6453767)
you've completely neglected BB height in your analysis.
BB height part of the reason why the "size your track bike 1-2cm smaller than your road bike" rule of thumb exists.


What the hell does that mean? Again...stop worrying about a single number and look at the whole frame geometry. When sizing a frame, consider the geometry of frames you have ridden that fit you, or didn't fit you.
Regardless of BB height, you should still have plenty of clearance if, as I stated before, your bodily proportions are within a normal range, and your frame fits properly. If your pubic bones clear a properly fitting road frame by even a inch (typically its more than that), you'll be able to straddle the same "size" track frame without issue.


The bottom line is....never judge the fit of a frame by standover. However, if your can't straddle your frame, its a good sign that the frame is probably not for you.

zelah 04-03-08 08:59 AM


Originally Posted by piwonka (Post 6453773)
how often do you stand over your top tube with both feet flat on the ground. standover don't mean much. i'm worried about the toptube length first then the seattube length.

every day. every time i get on or off my bike probably, any time i'm talking to one and we're not riding, anytime i stop to look at something.

people do more than just race in the drops then leap from their bikes.

SkyeC 04-03-08 09:30 AM


Originally Posted by mihlbach (Post 6453790)
The bottom line is....never judge the fit of a frame by standover. However, if your can't straddle your frame, its a good sign that the frame is probably not for you.

Um, what? So it matters, but it doesn't matter? :p

paulv 04-03-08 09:53 AM

3 pages. did the op get a bareknuckle or NOT?

comradehoser 04-03-08 09:57 AM

Sizing by seattube (conventional size labeling) IS an issue for people who are buying frames over the internet and cannot test-ride them. A high BB can make a company's declared 57cm bike fit like a 59 or 60cm square bike.

mihlbach knows this. All he is saying is that sizing conventions vary widely across companies, and at best, they should be treated as rough guidelines only. Ditto with top-tube to ground measurements (standover height). Consumers should never trust these numbers, but instead look at the actual stated geometry and length of the tubes--particularly the TT length, I'd say--when deciding which given size of bike to buy.

seatube/standover sizing and BB height is also an issue and a source of confusion in cyclocross bikes. Standover actually does matter "more" in the case of 'cross, given its off-road nature. But mihlbach is correct that in road applications, you can have very snug standover heights without it being that much of an issue. I remember reading an 80s bike book that said if you could straddle the top tube while leaning the bike over, you were fine, although I think that's pushing it a bit.

SkyeC 04-03-08 10:04 AM


Originally Posted by comradehoser (Post 6454088)
Sizing by seattube (conventional size labeling) IS an issue for people who are buying frames over the internet and cannot test-ride them. A high BB can make a company's declared 57cm bike fit like a 59 or 60cm square bike.

mihlbach knows this. All he is saying is that sizing conventions vary widely across companies, and at best, they should be treated as rough guidelines only. Ditto with top-tube to ground measurements (standover height). Consumers should never trust these numbers, but instead look at the actual stated geometry and length of the tubes--particularly the TT length, I'd say--when deciding which given size of bike to buy.

seatube/standover sizing and BB height is also an issue and a source of confusion in cyclocross bikes. Standover actually does matter "more" in the case of 'cross, given its off-road nature. But mihlbach is correct that in road applications, you can have very snug standover heights without it being that much of an issue. I remember reading an 80s bike book that said if you could straddle the top tube while leaning the bike over, you were fine, although I think that's pushing it a bit.


I tend to not size by seat tube but size by top tube. I like a 53 top tube so I buy bikes with that. The Bareknuckle I have happens to be 50x53. I've also recently had a 52x53 road bike, and my previous track bike was a 53x53 which felt fine too. What didn't feel ok was when I bought a 54x54 roadie, forget that Rivendellesque sizing, I did not feel ok on that bike! ;)

And FWIW, my Cannondale CAAD9 had a BB height just as high as my Bareknuckle...

piwonka 04-03-08 10:10 AM

a high bb does not make the bike fit like a larger bike. it just makes the head tube longer and the top tube higher...so the standover is a little higher, and not like it's multiple inches either.

size your bike by the top tube and unless you have some crazy body proportions, everything should fall into place. getting a track bike that is 2cm smaller than the appropriate sized road bike will just give you a bike with too much saddle to bar drop...that's kinda ok though, because when you further exaggerate that problem by using that jaguar stem that is too short and too deep and then putting your b123's on it, atleast some of us can make fun of you when you post pics of your bike.

mihlbach 04-03-08 10:11 AM


Originally Posted by SkyeC (Post 6453921)
Um, what? So it matters, but it doesn't matter? :p

What I mean is that once you are in the range of a good fit, standover shouldn't be an issue. You should fine tune the fit of a frame by considering the geometry of the whole frame.

However, if you can't straddle your frame, you are way off.

mihlbach 04-03-08 10:13 AM

FYI..if anyone didn't know, Bareknuckle geometry can be found here.

http://www.businesscycles.com/nessuno.htm

I don't think its posted anywhere else.

frankstoneline 04-03-08 10:16 AM


Originally Posted by mihlbach (Post 6454182)
What I mean is that once you are in the range of a good fit, standover shouldn't be an issue. You should fine tune the fit of a frame by considering the geometry of the whole frame.

However, if you can't straddle your frame, you are way off.

...and now the REAL point comes out. If you cannot stand over your bike, you have problems, but think about the difference of a few cm's, it's like MAYBE the width of your thumb. Doesnt make a huge difference if you are +/- one frame size in sizing. Once you get that close, find a top tube that fits etc.

comradehoser 04-03-08 10:20 AM


Originally Posted by piwonka (Post 6454167)
a high bb does not make the bike fit like a larger bike. it just makes the head tube longer and the top tube higher...so the standover is a little higher, and not like it's multiple inches either.

if a company sizes by seattube length, a higher BB can shorten the seattube for a given length of TT (thus a size mismatch, if you consider TT length to be crucial). This is definitely the case in some cross bikes.

kbjack 04-03-08 10:26 AM

dick length X 8.8. +/-1cm for girth.... use search.

EuroJosh 04-03-08 12:09 PM

I disagree kbjack, as a professional bike fitter the formula I use is 98% of hang-line to floor distance -cleat thickness.

piwonka 04-03-08 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by kbjack (Post 6454310)
dick length X 8.8. +/-1cm for girth.... use search.

i think op is a girl...in that case, should she substitute vibrator voltage amount/2 for dick length?

kbjack 04-03-08 03:40 PM

Hmm...I don't know, it worked for my girlfriend. We got her sized up just right...wait a minute *thinks* *keeps thinking*

kbjack 04-03-08 03:45 PM

Well goddamn, that's peculiar *keeps thinking*

kbjack 04-03-08 03:50 PM

Huh, well this wasn't a track bike so there wasn't BB height to consider...still the whole dick thing. I don't know, I don't have an answer for ya fella.

sp00ki 04-03-08 04:12 PM

wat

metaljim 04-03-08 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by sp00ki (Post 6456524)
****

huh?

turbominnow 04-03-08 06:09 PM

I thouht these frames coming with cable hangers? For some reason I saw those at the beginning of the year

jim-bob 04-03-08 07:06 PM

Cable hangers? I can't see anyone running centerpulls or cantis on those things.

SkyeC 04-03-08 07:31 PM

Heh, there was some sort of small run of them that came with cable stops on the top tube for some reason. Guess the guy in Italy got confused and thought these were supposed to be single speeds. ;)

zelah 04-03-08 07:36 PM


Originally Posted by piwonka (Post 6455105)
i think op is a girl...in that case, should she substitute vibrator voltage amount/2 for dick length?

i absolutely read this as "i think op is a dick girl"

jim-bob 04-03-08 07:39 PM

I don't even want to know what that means, do I?

zaman fu 04-04-08 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by bonechilling (Post 6441202)
Geez, a $2k Bareknuckle?! I can't imagine how you could even do that (gold plated everything?), much less why you would spend that much on a basic Cro-Mo frame like the Bareknuckle.

i do not think the deda 12.5 is "basic cro-mo" based on what i've read. not the top of the line deda stuff, but definitely more tech than 4130 steel tubing.

hellcomeshome 04-05-08 06:35 PM

Here's my BK I love it, I ended up spending around 2K too.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y13...doomknucks.jpg

JellyMeetsJam 04-05-08 07:18 PM


Originally Posted by SkyeC (Post 6439980)
ditto.

here's a pic since i'm bored.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2115/...c2b38e5859.jpg

subtle matching is just so much nicer


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.