Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

gear nerds

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-13-04, 02:07 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
auroch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
gear nerds

question: my old road conversion ran 42/14. my new pista rocks 48/16. both are 81 gear inches. so why does it feel like the pista's a tougher gear to crank (even with 5mm longer arms)? Shouldn't it be the same? What would happen if they were on the exact same bike? This is a more hypothetical question than practical.

Note: realistically I'm chalking it up to a month of not riding plus two weeks of holiday cheer. That or the pista's cursed.

jeff
auroch is offline  
Old 01-13-04, 04:49 PM
  #2  
(Grouchy)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
larger front gear = less torque. and less torque will make it harder to push or get started.

there's a reason why shimano made the dura ace 10 track group way back in the day...interestingly, that reason is the same reason it was banned by the UCI not long after it was introduced....

IN BEFORE THE GOOGLE AD-BOT!
OneTinSloth is offline  
Old 01-13-04, 09:22 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 85
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by OneTinSloth
IN BEFORE THE GOOGLE AD-BOT!
In before pigbike.
panasoanic is offline  
Old 01-13-04, 09:28 PM
  #4  
floor sleeper
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Here and there in the US
Posts: 998

Bikes: Raleigh Twenty, Puch 3 speed road conversion, lookin' into a Karate Monkey for a cruiser

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The best part is how serious he looks.

I like truvativ cranks and wanted to get an ss model in a low chainring flavor like 32 or 33 - like the Stylo SS, but I notice they only make them in 172.5 and 175's whereas I'm quite comfortable with my 170's... shame. This has very little to do with anything... but... this is what happens when you follow pig bike boy.
robertsdvd is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 03:31 PM
  #5  
Bananaed
 
Brillig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by OneTinSloth
larger front gear = less torque. and less torque will make it harder to push or get started.
Uhh....WHAT?!?

Something similar to that statement might be true if it weren't negated by the cog.
Brillig is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 04:21 PM
  #6  
(Grouchy)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
then why is a smaller chainring and cog that has the same gear inches as a larger chainring and cog easier to push?

excluding gear ratios...i've notice that smaller ring/cog configurations with exact ratios are easier to push than their larger counterparts...

like, say a 3:1 with a 14:42 is easier to push than a 3:1 with a 16:48....it should take the same effort to push because they're the same ratio...and yet?

Last edited by OneTinSloth; 01-14-04 at 04:27 PM.
OneTinSloth is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 04:30 PM
  #7  
(Grouchy)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
if you push with a lever that is longer in relation to the size of the chainring, it will be easier to push. longer lever = greater rotational force. rotational force=torque.
OneTinSloth is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 04:36 PM
  #8  
Not-so-Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Norfolk, England
Posts: 805

Bikes: Orbea Enol roadie, Fly Micromachine BMX, Fort Track fixed

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The only difference I'm aware of is that with smaller cogs (same gear of course), the chain wears faster and is more likely to break. This is due to the mathematics of the thing, turning moments and torque etc, that means each tooth on the cog is excerting a bigger force on the chain; this is amplified by the fact that fewer teeth are engaging the chain, meaning the load of the entire chain-to-cog interface is spread over a smaller area of teeth.

If that makes any sense
Jonny B is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 05:59 PM
  #9  
(Grouchy)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
you should go tell that to the BMX kiddies who like to run ratios like 25/9 nowadays....damn kids! why can't they just stick with 44/16 like everybody else did before them!?
OneTinSloth is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 07:24 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
auroch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ha ha (evil laugh).
this is exactly what I'd hoped for a post with talk of exerting ratios, rotational glayven, and torque whoosets. added bonus: pigs. seriously though the larger chainring less torque thing makes sense to me. I'll have to hit up Yojimbo's and check it out.

jeff
auroch is offline  
Old 01-14-04, 07:49 PM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: by a big river
Posts: 2,459
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
78 gear inches = 78 gear inches
MKRG is offline  
Old 01-15-04, 07:19 AM
  #12  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: New Caney Texas
Posts: 377
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by robertsdvd
The best part is how serious he looks.

I like truvativ cranks and wanted to get an ss model in a low chainring flavor like 32 or 33 - like the Stylo SS, but I notice they only make them in 172.5 and 175's whereas I'm quite comfortable with my 170's... shame. This has very little to do with anything... but... this is what happens when you follow pig bike boy.
I've got a set of 32 tooth Style SS cranks in 170. Chuckbikes had them before chirstmas and santa brought me a set. Don't know if they still have them or not. They're the older square taper variety, I think the new ones are ISIS.
familyman is offline  
Old 01-15-04, 07:36 AM
  #13  
Perineal Pressurized
 
dobber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: In Ebritated
Posts: 6,555
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 1 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Originally Posted by OneTinSloth
IN BEFORE THE GOOGLE AD-BOT!
Damn, the bar has been raised, the gauntlet thrown
dobber is offline  
Old 01-15-04, 07:51 AM
  #14  
Bananaed
 
Brillig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by stickerguy
seriously though the larger chainring less torque thing makes sense to me. I'll have to hit up Yojimbo's and check it out.

jeff
The larger chainring/less torque thing is true. But it's negated by the larger cog in the back so the net amount of torque is exactly the same.
Brillig is offline  
Old 01-15-04, 08:37 AM
  #15  
Ðây la`xe Ðạp của tôi
 
bombusben's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: milwaukee
Posts: 436
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Maybe the tires are flat on your pista.
bombusben is offline  
Old 01-15-04, 09:28 AM
  #16  
BFSSFG old timer
 
riderx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fredrock
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by stickerguy
question: my old road conversion ran 42/14. my new pista rocks 48/16. both are 81 gear inches. so why does it feel like the pista's a tougher gear to crank (even with 5mm longer arms)? Shouldn't it be the same? What would happen if they were on the exact same bike? This is a more hypothetical question than practical.

Note: realistically I'm chalking it up to a month of not riding plus two weeks of holiday cheer. That or the pista's cursed.

jeff
If all things are equal (including cranks), they will be the same.

Punch up Sheldon's Gain Ratio calculator for the real scoop.
riderx is offline  
Old 01-22-04, 05:25 PM
  #17  
na975
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Mentioned: Post(s)
Tagged: Thread(s)
Quoted: Post(s)
is a 52/13 good?
 
Old 01-22-04, 05:38 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
 
p3ntuprage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: birmingham
Posts: 829

Bikes: a tvt soon to become a s/s...

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
could be something to do with rotating mass/momentum.

but i doubt it. might just be that the cranks are the wrong length for your legs.

fssb
sparky
p3ntuprage is offline  
Old 01-22-04, 09:23 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
auroch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stoped by my bike shop and they not only said bigger chain ring does NOT equal less torque, but they kinda laughed good-naturedly about how others thought so.

It looks like OneTinSloth and Billig are flying solo (or tandem) on this one.

Bombusben- yeah my tires are inflated, and I took my lock off too just in case that was it.

I did however lower my seat like 2 cm and that seemed to help a lot: the placebo effect rules. I wish people would just tell me everything I buy is carbon kevlar adamantium so I'd be uber-fast

jeff
auroch is offline  
Old 01-23-04, 07:39 AM
  #20  
Bananaed
 
Brillig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Philly-ish
Posts: 6,426

Bikes: 2001 Lemond Nevada City (only the frame remains)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by stickerguy
It looks like OneTinSloth and Billig are flying solo (or tandem) on this one.
Dude. I was trying to tell you that the gearing was exactly the same. Wasn't that clear?
Brillig is offline  
Old 01-23-04, 11:00 AM
  #21  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
auroch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
crap you're right. my bad.
auroch is offline  
Old 01-23-04, 11:56 AM
  #22  
The Cycling Photographer
 
SipperPhoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Orange, CA
Posts: 1,404
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by na975
is a 52/13 good?
If you enjoy visits to the Orthopedist...

Maybe try a 53/11... Your knees will hate you ! :-)

jeff
SipperPhoto is offline  
Old 01-23-04, 05:50 PM
  #23  
(Grouchy)
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,643
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
when did i say the gearing wasn't exactly the same? it FEELS different...but it's the same.
OneTinSloth is offline  
Old 01-24-04, 03:35 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
auroch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 986
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
whoa, you guys shouldn't let me post anymore. I keep misreading everything everyone writes. I'm on sabbatical as of now...go!
auroch is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.