Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Lightest track crankset?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Lightest track crankset?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-08, 05:34 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Lightest track crankset?

I'm in the market for a new crankset, and I want to try to get something really light. I don't push a huge gear, so most cranks are stiff enough for me. What do you recommend?

Truvativ Omnium
FSA Carbon Track
Sugino 75
Sugino Grand Mighty
Campagnolo Record
Dura-Ace 7600
Dura-Ace 7710

Which of these is the lightest? Any other suggestions? I'm leaning toward the 7600.

Thanks a lot.
Waychel is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 05:38 PM
  #2  
big ring
 
MIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 5,838
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you want light cranks, get a road crankset and use 3/32" chain.
MIN is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 06:14 PM
  #3  
I just wanna ride
 
stryper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Chico Califo
Posts: 1,155

Bikes: 2013 BMC Impec

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Sugino messenger cranks are only 458 g. or at least that's what the interweb is telling me
stryper is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 06:24 PM
  #4  
Hip-star
 
jhaber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 629
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Factor in the bb into those weights as the Truvativ Omnium has a lighter bb than the others I believe.
jhaber is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 06:25 PM
  #5  
:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: duluth
Posts: 3,391

Bikes: '07 Pista, '09 Fantom Cross Uno, '8? Miyata, '67 Stingray, '0? Zoo mod trials, Tallbike, Chopper, '73 Schwinn Collegiate, '67 Triumph Chopper, '69 CB350, '58 BSA Spitfire, '73 CB450

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
You can always mill + drill too.

A good diet and exercise will always provide better results than a lighter crank tho




Yeah, I'm no help.
ianjk is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 06:42 PM
  #6  
Ride for Life
 
wearyourtruth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Houston
Posts: 2,740
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 6 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
i'm sure zipp makes something stupid light if you are looking to spend your money on that sorta thing.

i agree that getting a road double will find you with a lighter crank than true track cranksets. i agree with looking at the BB weight too. the move has been most recently to external BB's in road cranks, providing a larger (stiffer) and hollow (lighter) axle.

for instance (these are road weights):
DuraAce FC-7800: 761g
DuraAce FC-7701 crank: 599g + DuraAce FC-7703 BB: 211g = 810g
wearyourtruth is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 07:07 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
really light option that would be somewhat cheap.. but lacking in the bling dept would be to get a recent 2 piece road crank (with external bb). i got my tiagra crankset used for something like 60 bucks, in a 165 length. don't know weights though.

for real weights, check weightweenies. or get a sram red road crank, put whatever gear you want on it.
droptop is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 07:18 PM
  #8  
big ring
 
MIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 5,838
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Not that it's totally relevant but my Stonglight Pulsion is 540 grams with the ti bottom bracket and single ring.

MIN is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 08:52 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 1 Post
https://www.gottaridebikes.com/Mercha...t_Code=CCR0007

ouch.
dookie is offline  
Old 12-06-08, 10:09 PM
  #10  
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
rings

Needs one of these

fuzz2050 is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 07:29 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: four 1 OHHH , Maryland
Posts: 2,849

Bikes: nagasawa, fuji track pro

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 26 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
u want something REALLYlight, but in all honestly most of the cranks you listed have a nominal difference. there are other , more logical, places that you can save weight
jdms mvp is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 08:47 AM
  #12  
aka mattio
 
queerpunk's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 6,586

Bikes: yes

Mentioned: 13 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 344 Post(s)
Liked 58 Times in 35 Posts
Heh. do a google image search for "stronglight pulsion fail."

Apparently the first generation or whatever of these had some serious problems.

queerpunk is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 08:54 AM
  #13  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIN
If you want light cranks, get a road crankset and use 3/32" chain.
I'd definitely be into trying a road crankset. Two problems: 1) I know nothing about road bikes. 2) I'm very committed to 165mm cranks, and most road cranks I find on eBay are 170mm +.

Any suggestions? I'll look into the Tiagra.

And to convert a double into a single, all I need are shorter track chainring bolts, right?

Last edited by Waychel; 12-07-08 at 09:12 AM.
Waychel is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 11:07 AM
  #14  
big ring
 
MIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 5,838
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I found new old stock Campy record road in 165 mm at Nashbar last year for $120! If you use road cranks, don't use outboard bottom bracket so that you can use the outside ring position and adjust your chainline with bb spindle length.
MIN is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 11:24 AM
  #15  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIN
I found new old stock Campy record road in 165 mm at Nashbar last year for $120! If you use road cranks, don't use outboard bottom bracket so that you can use the outside ring position and adjust your chainline with bb spindle length.
Can I run a two-piece crank designed for outboard bottom brackets with a regular bottom bracket?

Something like this?

https://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?c...0Road%20Cranks

Or are you saying that I should stick with regular three-piece cranks?

Thanks a lot for your help.

Also, I'm planning to run the smaller ring. Would that cause a problem?
Waychel is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 11:40 AM
  #16  
big ring
 
MIN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 5,838
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
If you use outboard BB road cranks, you would need to use the inside ring position (goofy aesthetics) to maintain a decent chainline since the BB spindle is permanently attached to those cranksets . I would use Isis, Octalink or square taper bottom brackets.
MIN is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 11:41 AM
  #17  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 386
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
with the outboard bearings, you can't just grab a different bottom bracket. however, if you are doing a conversion (or anything with a 126 or 130 mm rear spacing, you have the ability to move the chainline between 6 an 10 mm, respectivly, in order to get it straight. normally, within 2 or 3 mm is acceptable. you will probably have to fiddle with the rings on the inside or the outside of the crank, and use a few different washers. i have not used one on a fixed gear, but don't see any major issues as long as you aren't chainline anal.

that 105 crank you linked does not include a bottom bracket, so be ready to factor in another $40, and at that price you are back into seguino 75 territory, hardly worth it in my opinion. check out the for sale forums of this board and craigslist in your local area for real deals, or if you can a bike co-op. we sold a set of ultegra cranks (used, but decent shape- octalink bb) for $35. i picked up my square taper 105's for $20, but they aren't shiny at all.

I am running an 80's 105 road double (square taper), with a zen messenger ring on the inside crankarm. have no idea what spacing bb came on the bike, but it lines up damn near perfect with my surly cog on a formula hub. now, i have had friends who have tried all sorts of crap trying to get theirs reasonably straight, but mine just worked fine.
droptop is offline  
Old 12-07-08, 12:08 PM
  #18  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 173
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
How about these:

https://www.nashbar.com/profile.cfm?c...0Road%20Cranks

With the matching BB. Using only the inner ring mounted inside of the spider.

643 g (crankset) + 222 g (bb) - 85ish g (outer ring) = 780 g

Is this lighter than most high-end track cranksets? This should give me a reasonable chainline?
Waychel is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.