32/12 vs 51/19
#1
Junior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
32/12 vs 51/19
I am sure this has been answered on here a million times, but I am not sure of the right vocabulary to use to find it with the search. So if you don't want to answer the question go read a different thread, don't be a ****** with to much time on your hands and tell me to search for it.
I was wondering what is the difference between running a small chaingear and cog vs a big chaingear and cog(assuming about the same ratio/GI)
I was wondering what is the difference between running a small chaingear and cog vs a big chaingear and cog(assuming about the same ratio/GI)
#4
Lovin the dirt!
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Perhaps Sheldon spoke of this, yep....
https://sheldonbrown.com/fixed.html
Big or Small?
nce you have decided on your gear ratio, then there's the question of which of several different equivalent sprocket/chainring combinations to use.
For instance, 36/12, 39/13, 42/14 45/15 48/16 all give the same 3:1 ratio. Which to choose?
Bigger Smaller
Good:
Slightly less friction
Longer chain/sprocket life
less chain tension
Slightly lighter
More log-jumping clearance
More chainstay clearance
Bad:
Slightly heavier
Chainstay clearance may be a problem on some frames
Rapid chain/sprocket wear
Greater chain tension (increased liklihood of the axle slipping in the frame)
These differences are mostly pretty minor. Most riders will be best served by a chainring somehere in the 30s for technical off-road use, 40s for road or bike path use, low 50s for track use.
Since 42 tooth rings are very commonly available on road cranksets, this size is particularly popular for conversions.
If you use a flip/flop hub, running smaller sizes gives you a bigger gearing difference for each tooth difference on the flip flop.
https://sheldonbrown.com/fixed.html
Big or Small?
nce you have decided on your gear ratio, then there's the question of which of several different equivalent sprocket/chainring combinations to use.
For instance, 36/12, 39/13, 42/14 45/15 48/16 all give the same 3:1 ratio. Which to choose?
Bigger Smaller
Good:
Slightly less friction
Longer chain/sprocket life
less chain tension
Slightly lighter
More log-jumping clearance
More chainstay clearance
Bad:
Slightly heavier
Chainstay clearance may be a problem on some frames
Rapid chain/sprocket wear
Greater chain tension (increased liklihood of the axle slipping in the frame)
These differences are mostly pretty minor. Most riders will be best served by a chainring somehere in the 30s for technical off-road use, 40s for road or bike path use, low 50s for track use.
Since 42 tooth rings are very commonly available on road cranksets, this size is particularly popular for conversions.
If you use a flip/flop hub, running smaller sizes gives you a bigger gearing difference for each tooth difference on the flip flop.
#5
cab horn
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353
Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times
in
19 Posts
51/19 has 19 skid patches vs 3 for the other combo. The former also takes more wear and weighs more. The former is also not available in dura ace cogs if you so cared.
#6
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: seoul korea
Posts: 461
Bikes: 3Rensho SuperRecord Export, Bridgestones MB1 RB1 XO2, Colnago Super, Medici GranTurismo, Schwinn Paramount, Olmo Competition, Raleigh Portage, Miyata 1000, Stumpjumper, Lotus Competition, Nishiki Maxima, Panasonic DX6000, Zeus Criterium
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 82 Times
in
36 Posts
search for it
#7
Full Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: seoul korea
Posts: 461
Bikes: 3Rensho SuperRecord Export, Bridgestones MB1 RB1 XO2, Colnago Super, Medici GranTurismo, Schwinn Paramount, Olmo Competition, Raleigh Portage, Miyata 1000, Stumpjumper, Lotus Competition, Nishiki Maxima, Panasonic DX6000, Zeus Criterium
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 82 Times
in
36 Posts
i'm kidding. i run larger rings and cogs as it takes wear and tear better and it also runs slightly smoother. 51 is pretty large. 45s, 47s and 49s are pretty good...
#9
Steel snob by accident
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 648
Bikes: Masi steel cross, Torelli steel roadie, Brew steel bmx
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts