Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

32/12 vs 51/19

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-09, 07:44 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 18
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
32/12 vs 51/19

I am sure this has been answered on here a million times, but I am not sure of the right vocabulary to use to find it with the search. So if you don't want to answer the question go read a different thread, don't be a ****** with to much time on your hands and tell me to search for it.

I was wondering what is the difference between running a small chaingear and cog vs a big chaingear and cog(assuming about the same ratio/GI)
Coolwhip-GA is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 07:46 PM
  #2  
Live without dead time
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,136
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bigger looks cooler and wears out slower. Other than that, not much
elTwitcho is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 07:48 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Eugene, OR
Posts: 593

Bikes: Jamis XLT 2.0, Kona Fire Mountain

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 12 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
smaller weighs a little less
Scratcher33 is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 07:53 PM
  #4  
Lovin the dirt!
 
MuddyPaws's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 28
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Perhaps Sheldon spoke of this, yep....
https://sheldonbrown.com/fixed.html
Big or Small?

nce you have decided on your gear ratio, then there's the question of which of several different equivalent sprocket/chainring combinations to use.
For instance, 36/12, 39/13, 42/14 45/15 48/16 all give the same 3:1 ratio. Which to choose?

Bigger Smaller
Good:
Slightly less friction
Longer chain/sprocket life
less chain tension
Slightly lighter
More log-jumping clearance
More chainstay clearance
Bad:
Slightly heavier
Chainstay clearance may be a problem on some frames
Rapid chain/sprocket wear
Greater chain tension (increased liklihood of the axle slipping in the frame)
These differences are mostly pretty minor. Most riders will be best served by a chainring somehere in the 30s for technical off-road use, 40s for road or bike path use, low 50s for track use.
Since 42 tooth rings are very commonly available on road cranksets, this size is particularly popular for conversions.

If you use a flip/flop hub, running smaller sizes gives you a bigger gearing difference for each tooth difference on the flip flop.
MuddyPaws is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 08:44 PM
  #5  
cab horn
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 28,353

Bikes: 1987 Bianchi Campione

Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 42 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 26 Times in 19 Posts
51/19 has 19 skid patches vs 3 for the other combo. The former also takes more wear and weighs more. The former is also not available in dura ace cogs if you so cared.
operator is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 08:50 PM
  #6  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: seoul korea
Posts: 461

Bikes: 3Rensho SuperRecord Export, Bridgestones MB1 RB1 XO2, Colnago Super, Medici GranTurismo, Schwinn Paramount, Olmo Competition, Raleigh Portage, Miyata 1000, Stumpjumper, Lotus Competition, Nishiki Maxima, Panasonic DX6000, Zeus Criterium

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 82 Times in 36 Posts
search for it
brooklyn_bike is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 08:52 PM
  #7  
Full Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: seoul korea
Posts: 461

Bikes: 3Rensho SuperRecord Export, Bridgestones MB1 RB1 XO2, Colnago Super, Medici GranTurismo, Schwinn Paramount, Olmo Competition, Raleigh Portage, Miyata 1000, Stumpjumper, Lotus Competition, Nishiki Maxima, Panasonic DX6000, Zeus Criterium

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 30 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 82 Times in 36 Posts
i'm kidding. i run larger rings and cogs as it takes wear and tear better and it also runs slightly smoother. 51 is pretty large. 45s, 47s and 49s are pretty good...
brooklyn_bike is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 10:52 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 128
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Did 53/19 for the longest on a new ride and loved it. Also, the more skid patches, always go for the odd rear
larsalan is offline  
Old 01-06-09, 11:06 PM
  #9  
Steel snob by accident
 
iwegian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 648

Bikes: Masi steel cross, Torelli steel roadie, Brew steel bmx

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by elTwitcho
bigger looks cooler
i guess i'm used to riding bmx, but i would have to say the contrary
iwegian is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.