![]() |
Biting the dust on hills
Yeah thats me on an incline, while everyone else rides 100 miles per hour past me.
Those of you who got a bike already built, did you change your gear ratio or stuck with what you got? If you live in a hilly area, what gear ratio are you riding? I'm considering changing the back cog (thats what people have suggested?), Im struggling so hard up hills, it's nearly impossible. I thought if I had kept what I had I would get used to it as time went on and eventually become more fit and be able to do it, but it's been over a month and I'm still having to walk up the super steep hills. Anyone else have the same problem or will it just take time for me to shape up and build strength? |
What gear ratio are you using now? I use a pretty low gearing compared to many other fg riders. 48x19 - about 66 gear inches. I like to spin at a higher cadence and I find the lower gearing good for city riding. Accelerates quickly in stop and go traffic and easier on the knees. Adjust your gearing if you need to and just keep riding, you'll get stronger.
|
If you do a lot of hilly climbs but also have some flats I've found 46 x 16 and 46 x 18 (as flip-flop) to be pretty useful. The only thing you have to worry about with 46 x 16 is the 1 skid patch, but if you avoid skidding and save your knees, it's not a big deal at all.
46 x 19 is really low. I ride 46 x 15 / 14, in Richmond, VA, some hills |
Im using 71 gear inches. It feels fine on flat, and starting and stopping was a slight pain at first but Im used to it now. But its almost not worth it because there are so many hills in Seattle, and I have to ride a very long, steep one up to my house, and I just cant seem to do it.
If it makes any difference, my fitness level is probablly much less than many of the people on here. I do ride my bike everyday for at least an hour or more and use it to go pretty much everywhere, I just figured after a month Id be able to at least go up the hills without getting so exhausted. Do you recommend going lower? |
my girlfriend runs 42 x 18 = 63 and is able to make it up all the hills and bridges easily. keep in mind you'll spin out faster going down hills the lower the ratio. i run around a ratio in the low 70s. also remember good technique makes a big difference: building up good momentum and really attacking the first half of the hill, pulling well with your arms into the stroke and finally standing and mashing if necessary. there's good info out there on proper riding technique that makes your ride more efficient...
|
Going lower is at least worth a try.
I live in Seattle too when I was first riding I was on 83 for a while, went to 71 after a few months from a suggestion from a friend, and found that to be a lot less taxing on the hills. Do you know anyone running lower or that has a cog you could try out? Some of its building the strength/endurance climbing, but you may benefit from a bit smaller as well. |
Lower gearing is worth a shot. You're not getting much work in walking that bike up the hill. Try going up 2 teeth on your cog. Give that a try, you can always go back to the smaller cog. Who knows, you might like the lower gearing and spinning at a higher cadence.
|
Originally Posted by idiq
(Post 8726151)
I ride 46 x 15 / 14, in Richmond, VA, some hills
|
Originally Posted by brooklyn_bike
(Post 8726235)
my girlfriend runs 42 x 18 = 63 and is able to make it up all the hills and bridges easily. keep in mind you'll spin out faster going down hills the lower the ratio. i run around a ratio in the low 70s. also remember good technique makes a big difference: building up good momentum and really attacking the first half of the hill, pulling well with your arms into the stroke and finally standing and mashing if necessary. there's good info out there on proper riding technique that makes your ride more efficient...
Originally Posted by Sll
(Post 8726236)
Going lower is at least worth a try.
I live in Seattle too when I was first riding I was on 83 for a while, went to 71 after a few months from a suggestion from a friend, and found that to be a lot less taxing on the hills. Do you know anyone running lower or that has a cog you could try out? Some of its building the strength/endurance climbing, but you may benefit from a bit smaller as well. Since you live in Seattle, you know that hill that becomes a brige on 12th going towards Beacon Hill (towards Pacific Medical Center) up to 14th and all that? I live up there and its such a pain getting up it, I'd probablly benefit from going a tad lower.
Originally Posted by lukewall
(Post 8726239)
Lower gearing is worth a shot. You're not getting much work in walking that bike up the hill. Try going up 2 teeth on your cog. Give that a try, you can always go back to the smaller cog. Who knows, you might like the lower gearing and spinning at a higher cadence.
|
Originally Posted by Sll
(Post 8726236)
Going lower is at least worth a try.
I live in Seattle too when I was first riding I was on 83 for a while |
Originally Posted by brooklyn_bike
(Post 8726235)
my girlfriend runs 42 x 18 = 63 and is able to make it up all the hills and bridges easily. keep in mind you'll spin out faster going down hills the lower the ratio. i run around a ratio in the low 70s. also remember good technique makes a big difference: building up good momentum and really attacking the first half of the hill, pulling well with your arms into the stroke and finally standing and mashing if necessary. there's good info out there on proper riding technique that makes your ride more efficient...
|
Yeah I know it, I live up on Beacon Hill also. You're taking the hill to the left or right of the medical center? The right side would be monster to have to do every day. When I first was riding it I walked once on the left hill but realized I was just giving myself a mental block, and just had to keep pedaling even if I felt slow. I get to ride the left to my place, and have only taken the right once or twice. It gets better, and if it helps I see a lot of people walking, majority of them with choice of gears too. You're not alone on it.
|
Originally Posted by Sll
(Post 8726298)
Yeah I know it, I live up on Beacon Hill also. You're taking the hill to the left or right of the medical center? The right side would be monster to have to do every day. When I first was riding it I walked once one the left hill but realized I was just giving myself a mental block, and just had to keep pedaling even if I felt slow. I get to ride the left to my place, and have only taken the right once or twice. It gets better, and if it helps I see a lot of people walking majority of them with choice of gears too. You're not alone on it.
|
I got a almost black frame with drops, I've only been riding since the start of winter so more people are bound to show up with the weather, but I don't think I have seen any one on a fixed out this way. I know they're around it just seems I only see them from Kings St. and northward.
|
Is another advantage/disadvantage to using slightly lower gear ratio skidding easier? Or does that just depend on your technique/strength?
|
48x17 and go up hills but at a really slow pace and usually out of breath at the top of the hill. If I was just commuting I'd try a lower gear but I like to get a nice workout when I ride.
|
Originally Posted by exhumed
(Post 8726368)
48x17 and go up hills but at a really slow pace and usually out of breath at the top of the hill. If I was just commuting I'd try a lower gear but I like to get a nice workout when I ride.
|
42x17 gets me around pretty much everywhere in the u-district.
|
Originally Posted by Saberhead
(Post 8726361)
Is another advantage/disadvantage to using slightly lower gear ratio skidding easier? Or does that just depend on your technique/strength?
BTW What bike do you ride? I live up on Cap Hill and every now and then see some female riders. |
Originally Posted by inertiadreamer
(Post 8726422)
Yeah lower gearing helps with skidding. Also If your at 71 gear inches I'd just suggest one or two less teeth on your cog, anything more and you have to spin to much going down the hills (unless you don't care).
BTW What bike do you ride? I live up on Cap Hill and every now and then see some female riders. Im in Cap Hill a lot by Seattle Central. Ive seen two or three female riders over there continuously but dont know em. I ride a black IRO Angus with gold bullhorns and gold velocitys. I havent gone to any events or anything, I wanted to go to Fast Friday but ended up being lazy that night. What about you? |
I've been running 42x19 (60.4 GI) lately. LOL. It's good for working on the ol' spin.
Climbing is no problem at all. ;) I'm probably going to move up to a 44t chainring to get a little more top end though. |
51/19 ~70gi great all round ratio
|
Originally Posted by idiq
(Post 8726151)
The only thing you have to worry about with 46 x 16 is the 1 skid patch, but if you avoid skidding and save your knees, it's not a big deal at all.
Maybe you were thinking of 48 x 16, which gives just 1 |
I have a 46/17, which provides the most skid patches. I love it. Not too spinny, but not too heavy for the climbs. I started out 46/16, and it was hell for a while but I got used to it.
|
Originally Posted by jch3n
(Post 8726421)
42x17 gets me around pretty much everywhere in the u-district.
Last 7/10 of a mile home. http://img211.imageshack.us/img211/7...wgrap5hphp.png I take the long way around on the track bike. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.