Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   terrible terrible brooks (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/536608-terrible-terrible-brooks.html)

jpdesjar 05-01-09 08:48 PM


Originally Posted by xg43x (Post 8838815)
user error, hands down.

this /\
how could a name like brooks allow their products to malfunction like this
far from terrible i say

F4UX3/2 05-01-09 11:56 PM

i've wtfpwnd 2 plastic clips in ~6 months, the roadie in me wants carbon clips and straps, but i dont think they exist... yet

Cyclist0383 05-02-09 12:41 AM


Originally Posted by whatsham (Post 8829812)
so

in the last six months i have purchased 3 brooks products that have failed.....wtf?

leather toe straps....broke within the first four hours of use.

alloy toe cages....snapped in half within two weeks of installation.

b17 saddle.....tensioning bolt rusted and snapped within 5 months.

i thought these guys had a good rep?

I've been commuting for over 15 years, rain or shine on Brooks saddles, I find it impossible that a thick bolt could rust so quickly as to break. I'm calling BS on this one.

vettefrc2000 05-02-09 01:11 AM


Originally Posted by Ziemas (Post 8839752)
I've been commuting for over 15 years, rain or shine on Brooks saddles, I find it impossible that a thick bolt could rust so quickly as to break. I'm calling BS on this one.

I would tend to agree.

whatsham 05-02-09 07:34 AM

there is no possible reason that i would lie about this.

i dont know why some of you are so gladly defending brooks when i even recieved an email from brooks re:the saddle, and its not an uncommon occurance apparently.
anyway.i do not care.the things failed.believe it or not.

Cyclist0383 05-02-09 07:37 AM


Originally Posted by whatsham (Post 8840286)
there is no possible reason that i would lie about this.

i dont know why some of you are so gladly defending brooks when i even recieved an email from brooks re:the saddle, and its not an uncommon occurance apparently.
anyway.i do not care.the things failed.believe it or not.

The bolt might have broken, but it certainly wasn't due to rust.

As for the other parts, I have no idea what Brooks is doing making those fashion items; I sure hope that they don't neglect their core saddle business.

whatsham 05-02-09 07:40 AM

well it was rusted at the break, and the threads were worn off completely around the break

Cyclist0383 05-02-09 07:41 AM


Originally Posted by whatsham (Post 8840303)
well it was rusted at the break, and the threads were worn off completely around the break

Rusted all the way through or surface rust? Did you buy the saddle NOS? Any photos?

FWIW, the Brooks on my bikes ridden in the rain are rust free.

whatsham 05-02-09 07:47 AM

I bought it brand new, the replacement bolt they sent is holding up perfectly. it wasnt rusted through, but maybe a mm or so down from the surface. ill go and see if i can find the bolt, but im sure i threw it out

jpdesjar 05-02-09 08:27 AM

i have been riding my brooks b17 for almost a year and i rode all winter, no rust on my bolt
this saddle is dreamy for my posterior
not sure about their straps...to pricey in my opinion

i am glad you got some replacement parts

carleton 05-02-09 09:36 AM


Originally Posted by whatsham (Post 8829812)
so

in the last six months i have purchased 3 brooks products that have failed.....wtf?

leather toe straps....broke within the first four hours of use.

alloy toe cages....snapped in half within two weeks of installation.

b17 saddle.....tensioning bolt rusted and snapped within 5 months.

i thought these guys had a good rep?

Everyone on this forum thinks that Brooks are the Cat's Meow. I prefer modern technology. Call me crazy for not wanting to wait 1,000 hours for a heavy saddle to break in. Especially when I can get one that's lighter and cheaper that feels great out of the box.

Only FG and Vintage riders choose Brooks. Vintage builders use them if the saddles match the period of the bikes. Not really sure why FG riders do. I haven't figured that out.

Raiden 05-02-09 09:42 AM

Don't forget us tourers- I love my brooks. I put my most uncomfortable lightweight racing saddles on my FGs.

Tigerprawn 05-02-09 12:49 PM


Originally Posted by carleton (Post 8840700)
Everyone on this forum thinks that Brooks are the Cat's Meow. I prefer modern technology. Call me crazy for not wanting to wait 1,000 hours for a heavy saddle to break in. Especially when I can get one that's lighter and cheaper that feels great out of the box.

Only FG and Vintage riders choose Brooks. Vintage builders use them if the saddles match the period of the bikes. Not really sure why FG riders do. I haven't figured that out.

I have a B17 special on my FG. It was comfortable outta the box and is more comfortable now. No other saddle has compared. Although, this is all subjective on your personal proportions and sit bones. I know plenty of people who cannot stand Brooks saddles and I know many who wouldn't ride anything else.

As for the "defending" of Brooks... Some riders have used Brooks for 30+ years and the dependability and quality has proven itself time and time again. To hear someone say "The bolt rusted and snapped" within a 5 month period just sounds ridiculous. Furthermore, their other products may be under warranty yet you didn't want to pursue it. It's as easy as writing an email and telling them what happened... unless you can't provide proof or purchase or bought it off someone else.

Do Brooks products fail? Sure they do. That's why the warranty is there. However, last time I checked Brooks didn't defy science and I'm pretty sure your bolt snapped for another reason that was not rust.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:17 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.