5'3" Riders and Their Bike's Geometry
#1
not aristotle
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
5'3" Riders and Their Bike's Geometry
I'm 5'3" with an inseam of 29", when measured barefooted, and looking to buy my first fg.
To anybody who a similar body build as I have,
What bike are you riding and what size is it?
What other bikes would you recommend?
To anybody who a similar body build as I have,
What bike are you riding and what size is it?
What other bikes would you recommend?
#2
kinda useless.
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 211
Bikes: Tommaso Augusta, Raleigh Sirocco, Raleigh Sovereign, Specialized Hard Rock
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I think the Fuji Track comes in 49cm, and the Giant Bowery with it's sloping top tube might also be a good pick.
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-US/...le/1274/29363/
https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-US/...le/1274/29363/
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'2" and a bit, 30 inch inside leg. My bike is a traditional diamond frame, typical Italian frame, 49 cm centre-to-centre. In bare feet, I straddle it with about a cm to spare. Of course I don't ride bare feet, so with cycling shoes, it's the traditional road bike 1 inch clearance more or less. That would be a 51 inch frame in centre-to-top measurement. So as far as height goes, you should fit a 50 cm centre-to-top. I wouldn't go smaller than that with 700c wheels, unless you want your handlebars high. Keep in mind that if you go smaller with a sloping top tube or a compact frame, the head tube can't be any shorter than it is for a 50 cm bike.
#4
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
My wife is 5'3" and she rides a 49cm center to top dave moulton frame and it fits her perfectly with a 29.5" standover height. Good luck finding one in your size though. You really should get on some bikes and figure out what geometry suits you best. If you're lucky it'll have the right size stem (which is very rare btw) so you'll probably want to get a new stem as well.
#7
dumps like a truck
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49
Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'2.5" (just found that out today at the doctor's office), and I ride a Waterford with a 47cm c-c seat tube, and a 51.5 c-c top tube. It fits PERFECTLY. You can have a bike with traditional geometry and 700c wheels if you're 5'2/5'3", but good luck finding it. If you're short, look at top tube measurements -- plenty of bikes have 49cm or other adequately sized seat tubes, but the top tubes are always too long. Depending on the length of your torso and arms, you could probably ride up to a 52.5 top tube using a fairly normal sized stem -- possibly a longer top tube with a really short stem (although, this might affect steering) or using cruiser/promenade/all-rounder handlebars.
#8
dumps like a truck
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49
Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Also, if you're okay with riding a conversion, Italian road frames, at least ones I've come across, tend to have square measurements -- ie 50x50 instead of, say, 49x53. So there's a good chance if you find a small Italian road frame, it would fit both height and length-wise. If you're looking for a track frame specifically, IRO, Fuji, and, last time I checked, Debernardi made a frame that I would've fit on. Good luck.
#9
not aristotle
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
my friend is about the same size about me and has a size 50 kilo tt, although he says he would've liked a 52 because the 50 seems short for him.
the top tube on the new dawes 50 is slighty longer than the kilo's.
So, I'm considering between these two choices.
i predict you'll guys say it'll be the difference between comfort and performance?
what are some of your opinions about riding in an upright position and riding in a more extended position?
the top tube on the new dawes 50 is slighty longer than the kilo's.
So, I'm considering between these two choices.
i predict you'll guys say it'll be the difference between comfort and performance?
what are some of your opinions about riding in an upright position and riding in a more extended position?
#10
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times
in
1 Post
seat tube length (frame size) is about leg length, not height...
i'm 5'11 with freakishly short legs (29" inseam). i ride 52cm +/-, with long top tube and/or stem.
i'm 5'11 with freakishly short legs (29" inseam). i ride 52cm +/-, with long top tube and/or stem.
#12
Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sorry if i'm derailing the discussion but i thought this might also be a concern for the shorter riders reading this post. i'm 5'5" and am in the process of doing a conversion to an old 48cm mondia frame and fork. it's the first conversion i've ever tried so i'm learning as i'm going. i was wondering if anyone that has done a conversion to a frame this size had any problems with pedal strike with 170mm crank arms. i've read other discussions about pedal strike but most of those riders were (i'm assuming) on larger frames.
#14
Newbie
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I'm 5'3" with a 29.5" inseam and trying to decide between the Mark V and Heidi. I'm worried that the Mark V might be too tall for me, but that the Heidi might be too cramped for me (I've got a long torso and arms). Any suggestions?
#15
666
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 656
Bikes: Raleigh 29er, IRO Angus frameset- random components, Giant Bowery, Raleigh Rush Hour frameset-future build
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
IRO heidi or Giant bowery.
#16
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I have the same measurements as you (though I have a freakishly short torso... don't know if that's a problem for you). I wanted to get a bare knuckle (they're my fav frameset), but they run big and there wasn't one that seemed comfortably small enough to fit me, so I feel your frusteration about frame sizing. anyway, I'll just tell you what I ride.
Top tube measures 52cm.
Standover height is 76cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to top of seat tube is 50cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to center of top tube junction is 45cm
the thing though is that because the bb is so high (& 165mm crank arms), I have to have my saddle up very decently high, which makes touching the ground while in saddle not quite safely possible, but then again I am also riding a bike on the street that was never intended to do so, so I can't complain too much about that. I just stradle the top tube when I stop and am not trackstanding.
the bike has very steep geo, and originally had a 130mm stem on it, I've got a 50 on there now, it's much comfier, though I'd rather be around a 90, at least I don't feel like maguilla gorilla riding it anymore. anyway, here is a pic so you can see it all put together:
geo on the thing is pretty tight, and now that I have a shorter stem it doesnt stretch my torso out too much anymore. it's comfortable for me to ride now
^crappy pic, but you get the idea of it's shape. the tt slopes down toward the seat tube just a tiny bit.
Top tube measures 52cm.
Standover height is 76cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to top of seat tube is 50cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to center of top tube junction is 45cm
the thing though is that because the bb is so high (& 165mm crank arms), I have to have my saddle up very decently high, which makes touching the ground while in saddle not quite safely possible, but then again I am also riding a bike on the street that was never intended to do so, so I can't complain too much about that. I just stradle the top tube when I stop and am not trackstanding.
the bike has very steep geo, and originally had a 130mm stem on it, I've got a 50 on there now, it's much comfier, though I'd rather be around a 90, at least I don't feel like maguilla gorilla riding it anymore. anyway, here is a pic so you can see it all put together:
geo on the thing is pretty tight, and now that I have a shorter stem it doesnt stretch my torso out too much anymore. it's comfortable for me to ride now
^crappy pic, but you get the idea of it's shape. the tt slopes down toward the seat tube just a tiny bit.
#17
nice to meet me
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
sorry if i'm derailing the discussion but i thought this might also be a concern for the shorter riders reading this post. i'm 5'5" and am in the process of doing a conversion to an old 48cm mondia frame and fork. it's the first conversion i've ever tried so i'm learning as i'm going. i was wondering if anyone that has done a conversion to a frame this size had any problems with pedal strike with 170mm crank arms. i've read other discussions about pedal strike but most of those riders were (i'm assuming) on larger frames.
#18
its that damned rap music
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: brooklyn, ny
Posts: 569
Bikes: Kilo TT, Bianchi Pista Concept 2005, Shogun 600 ~1983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
im reviving this *****.
the 44cm kilo im building up for my girl looks really dangerous with the 165mm cranks i have already (pedal strike). do they even make shorter cranks?
somebody point me in the right direction here. i wanna get her riding as soon as i can!
the 44cm kilo im building up for my girl looks really dangerous with the 165mm cranks i have already (pedal strike). do they even make shorter cranks?
somebody point me in the right direction here. i wanna get her riding as soon as i can!
#21
six too eight
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
kona makes the paddy wagon in a 49cm with a sloping top tube. You could put a 26" or 650c wheel on the front and get a hair more distance between you and the bike as well.
#22
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
I believe I'm a bit over 5'5, but the thing I absolutley hate about bike frames as they get smaller is the top tube slopes more and more. Not a fan of that look.
#23
manonthemoon
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 748
Bikes: Current custom builds: FG=KHS Flite 100 DH=Transition Blindside FR=Transition Bottlerocket
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
BD sells bikes in 44, 47, 48, 49. Can't remember exactly which ones offer which though.
#24
its that damned rap music
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: brooklyn, ny
Posts: 569
Bikes: Kilo TT, Bianchi Pista Concept 2005, Shogun 600 ~1983
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts