Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

5'3" Riders and Their Bike's Geometry

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

5'3" Riders and Their Bike's Geometry

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-20-08, 10:47 AM
  #1  
not aristotle
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
5'3" Riders and Their Bike's Geometry

I'm 5'3" with an inseam of 29", when measured barefooted, and looking to buy my first fg.

To anybody who a similar body build as I have,
What bike are you riding and what size is it?
What other bikes would you recommend?
awristawful is offline  
Old 06-20-08, 10:56 AM
  #2  
kinda useless.
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 211

Bikes: Tommaso Augusta, Raleigh Sirocco, Raleigh Sovereign, Specialized Hard Rock

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think the Fuji Track comes in 49cm, and the Giant Bowery with it's sloping top tube might also be a good pick.

https://www.giant-bicycles.com/en-US/...le/1274/29363/
imthewalrus is offline  
Old 06-20-08, 10:57 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,936
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'2" and a bit, 30 inch inside leg. My bike is a traditional diamond frame, typical Italian frame, 49 cm centre-to-centre. In bare feet, I straddle it with about a cm to spare. Of course I don't ride bare feet, so with cycling shoes, it's the traditional road bike 1 inch clearance more or less. That would be a 51 inch frame in centre-to-top measurement. So as far as height goes, you should fit a 50 cm centre-to-top. I wouldn't go smaller than that with 700c wheels, unless you want your handlebars high. Keep in mind that if you go smaller with a sloping top tube or a compact frame, the head tube can't be any shorter than it is for a 50 cm bike.
Longfemur is offline  
Old 06-21-08, 02:20 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
sluglug's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 55
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My wife is 5'3" and she rides a 49cm center to top dave moulton frame and it fits her perfectly with a 29.5" standover height. Good luck finding one in your size though. You really should get on some bikes and figure out what geometry suits you best. If you're lucky it'll have the right size stem (which is very rare btw) so you'll probably want to get a new stem as well.
sluglug is offline  
Old 06-21-08, 09:46 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 885
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my gf rides an IRO heidi
bionnaki is offline  
Old 06-21-08, 08:49 PM
  #6  
not aristotle
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bump.
are there no other short fixie riders?
lol, oh well
what would youse tallsies advise?
awristawful is offline  
Old 06-21-08, 08:57 PM
  #7  
dumps like a truck
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49

Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'2.5" (just found that out today at the doctor's office), and I ride a Waterford with a 47cm c-c seat tube, and a 51.5 c-c top tube. It fits PERFECTLY. You can have a bike with traditional geometry and 700c wheels if you're 5'2/5'3", but good luck finding it. If you're short, look at top tube measurements -- plenty of bikes have 49cm or other adequately sized seat tubes, but the top tubes are always too long. Depending on the length of your torso and arms, you could probably ride up to a 52.5 top tube using a fairly normal sized stem -- possibly a longer top tube with a really short stem (although, this might affect steering) or using cruiser/promenade/all-rounder handlebars.
lildave is offline  
Old 06-21-08, 09:05 PM
  #8  
dumps like a truck
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 49

Bikes: bridgestone 400 fixed conversion, khs aero track, specialized crossroads rebuilt with ultegra 105 and xt

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Also, if you're okay with riding a conversion, Italian road frames, at least ones I've come across, tend to have square measurements -- ie 50x50 instead of, say, 49x53. So there's a good chance if you find a small Italian road frame, it would fit both height and length-wise. If you're looking for a track frame specifically, IRO, Fuji, and, last time I checked, Debernardi made a frame that I would've fit on. Good luck.
lildave is offline  
Old 06-22-08, 01:56 PM
  #9  
not aristotle
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
my friend is about the same size about me and has a size 50 kilo tt, although he says he would've liked a 52 because the 50 seems short for him.
the top tube on the new dawes 50 is slighty longer than the kilo's.
So, I'm considering between these two choices.
i predict you'll guys say it'll be the difference between comfort and performance?

what are some of your opinions about riding in an upright position and riding in a more extended position?
awristawful is offline  
Old 06-22-08, 04:54 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 1 Post
seat tube length (frame size) is about leg length, not height...

i'm 5'11 with freakishly short legs (29" inseam). i ride 52cm +/-, with long top tube and/or stem.
dookie is offline  
Old 06-22-08, 06:00 PM
  #11  
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 41
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'3" with a 29" inseam and ride a 49cm soma rush with a 70mm -30 degree stem, fits perfectly.
dnnythms is offline  
Old 06-22-08, 11:50 PM
  #12  
Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 26
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
sorry if i'm derailing the discussion but i thought this might also be a concern for the shorter riders reading this post. i'm 5'5" and am in the process of doing a conversion to an old 48cm mondia frame and fork. it's the first conversion i've ever tried so i'm learning as i'm going. i was wondering if anyone that has done a conversion to a frame this size had any problems with pedal strike with 170mm crank arms. i've read other discussions about pedal strike but most of those riders were (i'm assuming) on larger frames.
alleyooptroop is offline  
Old 06-23-08, 12:40 AM
  #13  
not aristotle
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Long Beach, CA
Posts: 113
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oooo...i'm curious about that
pedal strike is frightful
awristawful is offline  
Old 09-06-08, 09:07 PM
  #14  
Newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I'm 5'3" with a 29.5" inseam and trying to decide between the Mark V and Heidi. I'm worried that the Mark V might be too tall for me, but that the Heidi might be too cramped for me (I've got a long torso and arms). Any suggestions?
mzo11 is offline  
Old 09-07-08, 12:55 PM
  #15  
666
 
triplesixer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 656

Bikes: Raleigh 29er, IRO Angus frameset- random components, Giant Bowery, Raleigh Rush Hour frameset-future build

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
IRO heidi or Giant bowery.
triplesixer is offline  
Old 09-07-08, 01:35 PM
  #16  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 7
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I have the same measurements as you (though I have a freakishly short torso... don't know if that's a problem for you). I wanted to get a bare knuckle (they're my fav frameset), but they run big and there wasn't one that seemed comfortably small enough to fit me, so I feel your frusteration about frame sizing. anyway, I'll just tell you what I ride.

Top tube measures 52cm.
Standover height is 76cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to top of seat tube is 50cm.
Measurement from center of bottom bracket to center of top tube junction is 45cm

the thing though is that because the bb is so high (& 165mm crank arms), I have to have my saddle up very decently high, which makes touching the ground while in saddle not quite safely possible, but then again I am also riding a bike on the street that was never intended to do so, so I can't complain too much about that. I just stradle the top tube when I stop and am not trackstanding.

the bike has very steep geo, and originally had a 130mm stem on it, I've got a 50 on there now, it's much comfier, though I'd rather be around a 90, at least I don't feel like maguilla gorilla riding it anymore. anyway, here is a pic so you can see it all put together:


geo on the thing is pretty tight, and now that I have a shorter stem it doesnt stretch my torso out too much anymore. it's comfortable for me to ride now


^crappy pic, but you get the idea of it's shape. the tt slopes down toward the seat tube just a tiny bit.
Maverick PHX is offline  
Old 09-07-08, 01:49 PM
  #17  
nice to meet me
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 280
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by alleyooptroop
sorry if i'm derailing the discussion but i thought this might also be a concern for the shorter riders reading this post. i'm 5'5" and am in the process of doing a conversion to an old 48cm mondia frame and fork. it's the first conversion i've ever tried so i'm learning as i'm going. i was wondering if anyone that has done a conversion to a frame this size had any problems with pedal strike with 170mm crank arms. i've read other discussions about pedal strike but most of those riders were (i'm assuming) on larger frames.
I pedal struck once. i'm 5'5.5 with about the same size frame(c-c speaking). 170mm suginos. I took a really sharp turn, though. other than that incident, it hasn't happened.
gotmyusernamechanged is offline  
Old 06-19-09, 11:04 PM
  #18  
its that damned rap music
 
oneangrytoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: brooklyn, ny
Posts: 569

Bikes: Kilo TT, Bianchi Pista Concept 2005, Shogun 600 ~1983

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
im reviving this *****.

the 44cm kilo im building up for my girl looks really dangerous with the 165mm cranks i have already (pedal strike). do they even make shorter cranks?

somebody point me in the right direction here. i wanna get her riding as soon as i can!
oneangrytoast is offline  
Old 06-19-09, 11:50 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 93
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bmx cranks, i've read it here somewhere that you cane use it.
Promo is offline  
Old 06-20-09, 07:48 AM
  #20  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
i use shorter cranks, but they arent necessary.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 06-20-09, 09:55 PM
  #21  
six too eight
 
zerosiah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Dayton, OH
Posts: 107
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
kona makes the paddy wagon in a 49cm with a sloping top tube. You could put a 26" or 650c wheel on the front and get a hair more distance between you and the bike as well.
zerosiah is offline  
Old 06-21-09, 08:56 AM
  #22  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 15
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I believe I'm a bit over 5'5, but the thing I absolutley hate about bike frames as they get smaller is the top tube slopes more and more. Not a fan of that look.
Henry H is offline  
Old 06-21-09, 03:31 PM
  #23  
manonthemoon
 
Triple8Sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 748

Bikes: Current custom builds: FG=KHS Flite 100 DH=Transition Blindside FR=Transition Bottlerocket

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
BD sells bikes in 44, 47, 48, 49. Can't remember exactly which ones offer which though.
Triple8Sol is offline  
Old 06-21-09, 04:38 PM
  #24  
its that damned rap music
 
oneangrytoast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: brooklyn, ny
Posts: 569

Bikes: Kilo TT, Bianchi Pista Concept 2005, Shogun 600 ~1983

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Henry H
I believe I'm a bit over 5'5, but the thing I absolutley hate about bike frames as they get smaller is the top tube slopes more and more. Not a fan of that look.
the kilo slopes just a bit in the 44, nothing too bad though
oneangrytoast is offline  
Old 06-21-09, 07:32 PM
  #25  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by oneangrytoast
the kilo slopes just a bit in the 44, nothing too bad though
take a side shot.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.