Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

road vs. bmx vs. track chainrings ?

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

road vs. bmx vs. track chainrings ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-18-09, 12:02 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Cali
Posts: 54
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
road vs. bmx vs. track chainrings ?

What are the differences between a bmx, road, or track chainring, assuming BCD and tooth count are the same?

fsa

rocket

origin8

plus, can anybody comment on the quality of any of these? Thanks a bunch
sbslammer is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 12:30 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most track rings are higher quality as far as roundness. Road rings are typically lighter. BMX stuff is heavier (NOT ALWAYS) but often there's less worry about true roundness.

Not everything is set in stone. there are exceptions but these are the "rules" of thumb.

Best rings are Sugino in my experience.
stewardmike03 is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 12:46 PM
  #3  
Road, MTB and SS Rider
 
spdrcr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 524

Bikes: Trek 5200, Yeti Kokopelli, Clockwork

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stewardmike03
Most track rings are higher quality as far as roundness. Road rings are typically lighter. BMX stuff is heavier (NOT ALWAYS) but often there's less worry about true roundness.

Not everything is set in stone. there are exceptions but these are the "rules" of thumb.

Best rings are Sugino in my experience.
That is one of the dumbest things I have read on here in a long time! lol Where did you come up with this silly statement? Why would track rings be any more or less round than a road or BMX ring? Do you think that a Dura Ace or Campy Record ring is really not round? lol

Now to answer the question.

A track ring and BMX ring basically have straight teeth and road rings have different ramps other devices to allow for smoother and better shifting. Road rings are also thinner because their chains are thinner to allow for the chains to work on more cogs on the cassette as it goes from 7 to 8 to 9 to 10 and eventually 11 cogs on the rear wheel. Track and BMW use 2 size chains for one of two thickness rings/cogs.

As for weight, it all depends on which one you go with.

The Sugino comment above by stewardmike03 would have to be solely a FG/SS comment as most would prefer a Shimano or Campy ring over a Sugino on a Road Bike!

Can't speak to BMX stuff, never ridden one.
spdrcr5 is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 01:18 PM
  #4  
*
 
adriano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 6,876

Bikes: https://velospace.org/node/18951

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Originally Posted by spdrcr5
That is one of the dumbest things I have read on here in a long time! lol
open mouth. insert foot.
__________________

α
adriano is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 01:43 PM
  #5  
Road, MTB and SS Rider
 
spdrcr5's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 524

Bikes: Trek 5200, Yeti Kokopelli, Clockwork

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by adriano
open mouth. insert foot.
really? so you also find that "Most track rings are higher quality as far as roundness."???
spdrcr5 is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 06:56 PM
  #6  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
As someone who has a long history with BMX bikes before recently making the leap to fixed gear (my back couldn't take it!)...I raced semi-pro some years back and continue to be somewhat of an old-school BMX enthusiast...I can assure you that the the statement of track rings being "more round" couldn't be more false. It's a sh*tty component maker that creates bad chainrings...BMX, track or otherwise.

The biggest difference is that BMX chainrings usually have 110 bolt spacing, meaning more chainring/less crank arm spider than "track" cranks/rings when you move into 40+ teeth territory.

Hope that helps (at least a little).

Last edited by Scrodzilla; 06-18-09 at 07:16 PM.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 07:48 PM
  #7  
Señor Member
 
Understanding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 548
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
i suppose, what he means, is that what's the difference in perforumance from 144, 130, and 110 bcd, if the tooth count is the same. To me that's more of an intelligent newb question, cause the first thing i thought when i saw this was "why are there all these different standard?"

the only think i can come up with for WHY is that manufactures come out with their own standards, and with most things, they got adopted by others.

as for the roundness statement, cheap alloys don't always hold their shape.
Understanding is offline  
Old 06-18-09, 07:58 PM
  #8  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,053
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
Agreed...that is an intelligent question. Speaking only for myself, I've run track cranks/chainrings as well as BMX-style stuff on my fixed gear (currently running 170mm Bulletproofs w/110 bcd) and have never noticed a difference in performance. As far as aesthetics go, I prefer 110 bcd w/ smaller spider.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 06-19-09, 04:24 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 279
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
LOL...Nice. What I meant and implied was that TRACK chainrings (1/8" and 144bcd for the most part) are nearly ALL high quality. Only a few no-name manufacturers exist that make shoddy TRACK chainrings. Road rings do indeed have ramping and pinning but there are some phenominal 130bcd rings...TA Specialties for example...that are made singlespeed or track use...these have straight cut teeth. And last BMX...again there are some excellent examples but just as many crappy knock-off pieces...and yes most are 110bcd. When it comes to stiffness, roundness, and durability you will find it increasingly difficult to beat a true TRACK chainring...Sugino 75's will outlast nearly any other.
stewardmike03 is offline  
Old 06-19-09, 04:43 AM
  #10  
Real Men Ride Ordinaries
 
fuzz2050's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,723
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 17 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
As far as aesthetics go, I prefer 110 bcd w/ smaller spider.
Really? I lean the opposite direction, in my mind nothing is prettier than a 144 bcd ring in the high 40's. Big enough to have the pretty cutouts, and still have the nice big fluted spider.



although I can be convinced by a nice vintage 3 pin

fuzz2050 is offline  
Old 06-19-09, 07:54 AM
  #11  
dsh
Oh, you know...
 
dsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: DC
Posts: 2,834

Bikes: '74 Schwinn Sports Tourer (Polo), S-Works E5 Team Festina (Chorus 11), Trek 2200 Bonded Carbon (Fixed), Trek 920 (7 speed IGH), Chesini Olimpiade SL (1x7)

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
No he's right, one time I ordered a road chainring and it wasn't even CLOSE to round. Had to send it back.



Never ordering from THEM again that's for sure.
dsh is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.