Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Between the Dawes sst-al or the Motobecane Track

Search
Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Between the Dawes sst-al or the Motobecane Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-10-09, 12:55 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
shortshorts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Between the Dawes sst-al or the Motobecane Track

Hi fellas.
I'm buying my 1st fixed gear bike, & I could use some purchasing advice, please.

I plan on using this as my daily commute bike, its about an 8 mile ride one way. I won't be do any track racing or what not, but I do ride in the street and I like to try to go pretty fast. No toodlin' around on the sidewalk for me.

I'm eyeballing these two bikes on that bikes direct site.
https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...st_al_carb.htm
&
https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...cane/track.htm




My main things are:

1. weight.
I thought that aluminum bikes were much lighter than steel ones, but I emailed bikesdirect and they said the moto track is about 20 lbs too, so thats awesome. Right now I'm pushing around an old schwinn sprint 10 speed, it weighs a ton. I've read around online a bit, and figured out to stay away from hi-ten steel, but other than that I'm not sure what is good/light.


2. I don't know hardly anything about component quality. Is there much of a difference between the two bikes? I saw that the sst-al has sealed bearings in its hubs. Are those something that affects how smooth & fast it rides, or is it more for longevity and lack of maintenance?


3. The dawes is pretty ugly with those big ol' logos, and I really like the look of the no decals on the motobecane. I guess I could just rattle can the dawes, but I'd like a white bike and since the moto already comes in white that'd save me some trouble.
But I'd prefer the better bike, regardless of looks.


So, are these pretty much on par with each other, or is the dawes noticeably better?

I've seen how popular the kilo tt is, but isn't that more of a track geometry than a road geometry?
I figured I'd need a road once since I intend to, you know, ride on the road.
I'm a bit clueless how to tell which bike has which type of geometry.
Also I saw that new kilo stripper comes in a sparkly white, & that might be kinda snazzy.
Or is that basically the same kilo tt, but with fancy paint?
https://www.bikesdirect.com/products/...t_stripper.htm



I'd really appreciate any tips & advice, thanks so much.

-mike




shortshorts is offline  
Old 09-10-09, 01:13 AM
  #2  
Member
 
jack1212's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 30
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The most expensive things on a bike are the drivetrain, wheels then brakes. The Dawes SST Al has brand name brakes, crank and good wheels and will ride for a while without "upgrades". The Motobecane Track has a no name crankset, 1 no name rear break pad and a heavy cheap wheelset. All three of which will probably have to be replaced/upgraded. However it does have a nice steel frame and is $100 cheaper so its not a fair comparision.

All in all, if you want to get a nice bike, for the price of the dawes sst al you can get this one:
https://bikesdirect.com/products/merc...t_stripper.htm
jack1212 is offline  
Old 09-10-09, 02:23 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,676

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 425 Post(s)
Liked 454 Times in 313 Posts
dawes al is the better bike in terms of performance and value. but for a getting-around-town beater i wouldn't mind the motobecane.

and a kilo really isn't that different from a "road" geometry bike. the kilo stripper looks like a good deal too.

but yeah, if it were me, i would get the dawes sst al between the two.
tFUnK is offline  
Old 09-10-09, 02:25 AM
  #4  
Gentlemen.
 
ADSR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 1,516

Bikes: S-Works e5 Aerotech with 2009 Veloce and a Fulcrum 5s

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jack1212
The most expensive things on a bike are the drivetrain, wheels then brakes. The Dawes SST Al has brand name brakes, crank and good wheels and will ride for a while without "upgrades". The Motobecane Track has a no name crankset, 1 no name rear break pad and a heavy cheap wheelset. All three of which will probably have to be replaced/upgraded. However it does have a nice steel frame and is $100 cheaper so its not a fair comparision.

All in all, if you want to get a nice bike, for the price of the dawes sst al you can get this one:
https://bikesdirect.com/products/merc...t_stripper.htm
agreed, except a steel frame will not be as stiff as an aluminum frame, so if you like to sprint aluminum may be just the thing. If aluminum rides too rough, just put some bigger tires on and problem solved.
ADSR is offline  
Old 09-10-09, 09:33 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
shortshorts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 139
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ADSR
agreed, except a steel frame will not be as stiff as an aluminum frame, so if you like to sprint aluminum may be just the thing. If aluminum rides too rough, just put some bigger tires on and problem solved.
I don't know about sprinting or what not,
its just there are no bike lanes around here and i've got to pedal like hell to keep up with car traffic.
Crazy drivers, man.



Also, In the pics it looks like the dawes wheels are snugged up tighter to the frame than the moto track's.
Is that significant in anyway, or just maybe they used a photo of a small frame on one, and a big frame on the other?
shortshorts is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.