any reason for conventional cog over bolt on?
#1
18 dog baby
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 400
Bikes: 2008 crosscheck complete, 1984 Pugeot fixed conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
any reason for conventional cog over bolt on?
I'm going to buy a new wheelset for my Crosscheck and I'm wondering: Is there any reason to go for a conventional cog/lockring setup instead of a bolt-on cog?
#2
Comanche Racing
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Deep in the heart of Texas
Posts: 2,820
Bikes: Presto NJS build, Specialized Allez Pro w/ full Dura Ace and Ksyrium SLs, 1990something Specialized Sirrus
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
well the "traditional" style cog/lockring combo is going to have more options b/c it is more popular. Other than that, it is an inferior design to bolt-on.
#3
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Athens, Ohio
Posts: 1,568
Bikes: Fuji Track, Half built 70s Azuki
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
one major disadvantage i could see with the traditional is if you don't know how to properly install a cog, you could f up the hub.
#4
Gentlemen.
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chico, CA
Posts: 1,516
Bikes: S-Works e5 Aerotech with 2009 Veloce and a Fulcrum 5s
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
It was my impression that once you get the screw-on cog on there and tightened down it will stay very very well. The bolt-on had the potential to loosen the bolts through repeated stresses, and play can develop. Maybe it's just hearsay?
Long story short, screw-on cogs are fine, just learn to install them, remember that chainwhips and lockring tools are cheaper than new wheels, and have at it!
Long story short, screw-on cogs are fine, just learn to install them, remember that chainwhips and lockring tools are cheaper than new wheels, and have at it!
#5
18 dog baby
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 400
Bikes: 2008 crosscheck complete, 1984 Pugeot fixed conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
PedallingATX:
why is it an inferior design to bolt-on? aside from the assumption that bolt-on cogs will loosen over time.
i'm looking at the bolt-on set-up because i don't want to have to carry around three tools when i'm traveling.
why is it an inferior design to bolt-on? aside from the assumption that bolt-on cogs will loosen over time.
i'm looking at the bolt-on set-up because i don't want to have to carry around three tools when i'm traveling.
#6
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Tokyo
Posts: 1,938
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 7 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times
in
2 Posts
Bolt on would be fine, bolts hold 8" Disc rotors on well enough on a mad DH run, I have never ever ever heard of bolts coming loose, even though the stresses placed upon it are far greater than your legs can apply.
ADSR "The bolt-on had the potential to loosen the bolts through repeated stresses, and play can develop. Maybe it's just hearsay?"
That is a pretty bad statement, if Jon Stewart heard that he would rip u for it. You make a statement saying they "had the potential to come loose" but then say "meh, that might be just hearsay". Basically you are admitting that there is zero evidence for what you are saying, but you are spreading the baseless view anyway.
Being able to change a cog easily with a standard tool I always keep in my bag sounds like a great idea.
ADSR "The bolt-on had the potential to loosen the bolts through repeated stresses, and play can develop. Maybe it's just hearsay?"
That is a pretty bad statement, if Jon Stewart heard that he would rip u for it. You make a statement saying they "had the potential to come loose" but then say "meh, that might be just hearsay". Basically you are admitting that there is zero evidence for what you are saying, but you are spreading the baseless view anyway.
Being able to change a cog easily with a standard tool I always keep in my bag sounds like a great idea.
#7
Senior Member
Torque wrench and lock tight = s.h.i.t. aint getting rattled off. How often do all the other components on your bike (a majority of which are bolted on) come off due to cyclical stress?!?!!?
#8
chickenosaurus
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,189
Bikes: 2010 Motobecane Team Track, 1997 GT Edge, 2012 Kilo TT Stripper
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
thread on is the standard, so finding cogs will be easier, but from a design standpoint, bolt on makes much more sense. I will continue to use thread on because it poses no danger, the technology is safe, and it is much cheaper than bolt on hubs.
#10
.
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 132
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
+1
I installed level hubs on my bike about 3 or 4 years ago and bought an additional cog in a different size. It was a bit expensive, considering the cost of a typical threaded version, but now, the cogs are outrageous, like 50-60 bucks apiece (Speedgoat used to carry them, don't know if they do anymore). Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the hubs, but beware of extra cost... Not really worth any sort of additional advantage that may be there (I'm not convinced there's a big difference between the two types of assembly). EDIT, the bolts don't loosen when used...
Tangent, isn't Phil Wood doing a bolt on hub now?
I installed level hubs on my bike about 3 or 4 years ago and bought an additional cog in a different size. It was a bit expensive, considering the cost of a typical threaded version, but now, the cogs are outrageous, like 50-60 bucks apiece (Speedgoat used to carry them, don't know if they do anymore). Don't get me wrong, I absolutely love the hubs, but beware of extra cost... Not really worth any sort of additional advantage that may be there (I'm not convinced there's a big difference between the two types of assembly). EDIT, the bolts don't loosen when used...
Tangent, isn't Phil Wood doing a bolt on hub now?
#11
spin
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,170
Bikes: raleigh m-60, azonic steelhead, schwinn world sport fixed gear
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
tomicogs are about 30$ and work with any 6 bolt disc hub. I have one and it has been great.
Last edited by The LT; 06-25-09 at 03:22 PM.
#12
BFSSFG old timer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fredrock
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
I have many miles on traditional fixed cogs, bolt on and Level set ups. If I could only have one it would be the bolt on, period. Tomi cog and London Fixed both make them, so obtaining them isn't hard. They will not loosen - unless you are a poor mechanic but then you have just as much chance to screw up a traditional fixed cog install as well. All systems work and work fairly well, but the bolt on is easiest to deal with.
Out of the three set ups, the only one I've ever had fail was the traditional cog (everything can break, just offering a data point).
Out of the three set ups, the only one I've ever had fail was the traditional cog (everything can break, just offering a data point).
#13
18 dog baby
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Honolulu
Posts: 400
Bikes: 2008 crosscheck complete, 1984 Pugeot fixed conversion
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
alright. that settles it. I'm going for the bolt-on set up.
#15
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 400
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
bolt on cog
once my frend made disk brake hub front into rear hub for fix cog to bolt on and it wrked but the hub i have is just threds like formuls stuf can i make it bult on coz ive seen it fail on my frend riderx i woz there he fell very bad down the hill
once my frend made disk brake hub front into rear hub for fix cog to bolt on and it wrked but the hub i have is just threds like formuls stuf can i make it bult on coz ive seen it fail on my frend riderx i woz there he fell very bad down the hill
#16
BFSSFG old timer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fredrock
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
Not sure, happened during a mountain bike race. First I lost one tooth, then kept racing it. A few laps later the big chunk went missing and I had to ride another 3 miles with that thing. The cog had a good bit of miles on it but it was an EAI which isn't junk. As for Patricky's ramblings, I have no idea what he is saying, he must be into the ether again...
#17
Senior Member
In theory, the bolt on system is mechanically better, and indeed it is better if you can get everything to line up correctly. The biggest problem is that the non-drive side of a disk hub isn't designed to line up with a drive train, so you have to consider chainline and whether or not your cog will work with the front end of your DT. Be sure that whatever you buy, it will line up correctly without having to deeply dish your wheel or use excessive amounts of axle and/or cog spacers.
#18
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Backwoods of Ontario
Posts: 2,152
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
In theory, the bolt on system is mechanically better, and indeed it is better if you can get everything to line up correctly. The biggest problem is that the non-drive side of a disk hub isn't designed to line up with a drive train, so you have to consider chainline and whether or not your cog will work with the front end of your DT. Be sure that whatever you buy, it will line up correctly without having to deeply dish your wheel or use excessive amounts of axle and/or cog spacers.
Edit: I forgot to say that I used a front disc hub and rebuilt with proper axle/cones to use it on the rear.
Last edited by Steev; 06-26-09 at 10:43 AM.
#19
BFSSFG old timer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fredrock
Posts: 1,912
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time
in
1 Post
In theory, the bolt on system is mechanically better, and indeed it is better if you can get everything to line up correctly. The biggest problem is that the non-drive side of a disk hub isn't designed to line up with a drive train, so you have to consider chainline and whether or not your cog will work with the front end of your DT. Be sure that whatever you buy, it will line up correctly without having to deeply dish your wheel or use excessive amounts of axle and/or cog spacers.
#20
Still kicking.
Huh?
__________________
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
Appreciate the old bikes more than the new.
#21
Homey
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 13,499
Mentioned: 56 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 2427 Post(s)
Liked 1,403 Times
in
898 Posts
Yo peace out brah.
Dude, whassup?
#22
Senior Member
I did the same thing using a front Surly disk hub and (17t) Tomicog cog. The frame is an older Redline Monocog Flight and has 110mm spacing in the rear, so I only needed to space each side out an extra 5mm. With zero dish the chainline is 45-46 mm, which matches my front end with WI ENO cranks and Shimano 107mm BB.
I don't think a disk hub is necessary for street use...typically road gear ratios are high enough that, with proper installation, the hub, cog, and lockring will not strip. For offroad gear ratios (e.g 2/1) I recommend a bolt-on due to the higher amounts of torque associated with the lower gearing.
#23
Messing with your mind
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 971
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
|)0000000000000|)! `/4 90++4 |)0 133+!
#24
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 54
Bikes: 1986 Bridgestone Mile 112, space violet
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times
in
0 Posts
Good point about watching the chainline. Disc hubs are MTB hubs (135mm spacing) and the disc side is spaced the same as the freewheel side of a disc single speed hub. Chainline is right around 54mm which mates up nicely with the outside ring of a properly setup MTB crank. Fortunately the Crosscheck has gnot-right spacing allowing for an MTB hub, so just make sure you've got the right size BB for your crank and you will be good to go.