![]() |
A single speed doesn't have the advantages of neither a geared bike nor a fixed gear. In other words it sukcs, unless its a cruiser for cruising around town.
|
The problem with coaster brakes is that they're relatively heavy, and they act only on the rear wheel. You have the most stopping power in the front, on ANY vehicle, because the more you decelerate, the more of your weight goes to the front. Your maximum rate of deceleration from either wheel is achieved just before the wheel locks up (that's the point of anti-lock brakes); that point occurs much, much sooner in back than in front because the more you decelerate, the less traction it has. In the front, the more you decelerate, the more weight is up there, and you get more traction. It's still useful to have two brakes, but the front is by far the most important of the two. (it's also good to know instinctively which hand operates which brake). And of course, you noticed the problem of what happens if the chain falls off.... :P
Cruisers are good candidates for coaster brakes because they're relatively heavy already; they're generally not ridden as fast; they generally have long wheelbases and more of the weight farther behind the front wheel; coaster brakes need minimal maintenance and cruisers are often ridden by people who don't want to bother with maintenance; and they're often ridden by people who aren't comfortable with hand brakes (there are lots of reasons for that, but that's another story). On a related note, why does "fixed gear" so often seem to be synonymous with brakeless? Whether or not you have rim brakes, disc brakes, rod brakes, drum brake, or a cinder block on a rope to drop when you want to slow down, has nothing to do with whether your drivetrain has a freewheel or not. To get back to the original question, it's slightly nutty to go on a long, hilly ride on a bike with only one gear now that modern bikes have so many different ways of getting variable gearing. But it's really only slightly nutty, and it's certainly possible to do it and have a good time whether it's a SS or a fixed gear. Do what you think you'll enjoy more. But please use at least a front brake, whichever way you go. |
ya not looking like a ElevenTeen year old girl oh daddy bike.
|
|
I just switched to fixed, and it's only mildly terrifying. What are you waiting for?
|
Originally Posted by ninniku
(Post 11420634)
I just switched to fixed, and it's only mildly terrifying. What are you waiting for?
|
..
|
Just try each, see which ride you prefer, then go with that.
I tried FG for 2 months, didn't like it as much as SS, so just went back. |
Originally Posted by Coluber42
(Post 11394852)
Yes, that is true... but on a bicycle, you do not have the same power output throughout the entire circle. The top/bottom of the pedal stroke is almost a "dead" spot, relative to the force you can apply from the 10:00/2:00 position. And at very low RPMs, you have very little leverage to get you over the top. Good climbing technique at higher RPMs means keeping up with the pedals so that back pressure never happens, at which point it's completely irrelevant whether your drivetrain is fixed or not. But at lower RPMs that becomes less feasible, and the fixed drivetrain helps keep the pedals going through the weaker parts of your pedal stroke so that you can apply power as you're able. And even at higher RPMs, it means that you can get sloppier in your technique (read: tired) and still keep the RPMs higher, because you get a split second of recovery time mid-stroke, which keeps your legs feeling fresher. It's a small difference, but it is there and noticeable. Basically, you're not getting perpetual motion machine benefits, but you are still benefitting due to the biomechanics of pedalling.
If you need a fixed gear to help you through the dead spot at any speed or cadence, then you aren't pedaling properly. |
Originally Posted by Coluber42
(Post 11394852)
Yes, that is true... but on a bicycle, you do not have the same power output throughout the entire circle. The top/bottom of the pedal stroke is almost a "dead" spot, relative to the force you can apply from the 10:00/2:00 position. And at very low RPMs, you have very little leverage to get you over the top. Good climbing technique at higher RPMs means keeping up with the pedals so that back pressure never happens, at which point it's completely irrelevant whether your drivetrain is fixed or not. But at lower RPMs that becomes less feasible, and the fixed drivetrain helps keep the pedals going through the weaker parts of your pedal stroke so that you can apply power as you're able. And even at higher RPMs, it means that you can get sloppier in your technique (read: tired) and still keep the RPMs higher, because you get a split second of recovery time mid-stroke, which keeps your legs feeling fresher. It's a small difference, but it is there and noticeable. Basically, you're not getting perpetual motion machine benefits, but you are still benefitting due to the biomechanics of pedalling.
The equivalent on a freewheeling bike is when you get sloppy and you can feel the freewheel re-engaging as you turn the cranks over. The difference is that it's more obvious and you're not wasting the momentum you already have. Fixed gears don't help you climb, they just let you feel smoother than you are while letting you slow yourself down. |
Originally Posted by aMull
(Post 11409290)
A single speed doesn't have the advantages of neither a geared bike nor a fixed gear. In other words it sukcs, unless its a cruiser for cruising around town.
Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over gears: - No derailleurs to maintain. - Less weight thanks to no detailers, a single chainring and no cassette. - A more durable bike. - A simplified drive train without the additional resistance provided by the upper/lower jockey wheels required by a derailleur system. - No need for asymmetrical wheel dishing to accommodate a cassette, resulting in more durable wheelsets. - Can still coast. Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over fixed: - I can coast down hills as fast as I want. - I can keep an absolutely silent core while braking hard and shifting my weight back as far as possible (since I can stop my feet while maintaining rear traction at high speed). - All of my energy goes to moving the the bike forward and none of my bicycle's (forward or wheelspin) momentum ever gets wasted on lifting up my feet. - I can spin rpms well into the red zone of my body's capabilities, without worrying about having to keep up with the pedals or being knocked off balance by them if I lose steam. - I am generally more nimble thanks to my ability to stop and start my cranks at any moment I want, in any position I want. Yeah. Singlespeeds suck. Whatever am I thinking "cruising around" NYC traffic on my singlespeed drive train. As far as the dead-zone goes: you are still translating your bike's momentum into pedal momentum, which is energy going the wrong way. It is no harder to continue cycling in the dead zone on a singlespeed, you're just much less likely to lose any energy to bad cycling technique when you are tired. If the dead zone is a problem for you on climbs, you are not strong enough for the gain in your drivetrain given the terrain you are riding on. |
Originally Posted by cab chaser
(Post 11423073)
Care to back that claim up with some evidence?
Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over gears: - No derailleurs to maintain. - Less weight thanks to no detailers, a single chainring and no cassette. - A more durable bike. - A simplified drive train without the additional resistance provided by the upper/lower jockey wheels required by a derailleur system. - No need for asymmetrical wheel dishing to accommodate a cassette, resulting in more durable wheelsets. - Can still coast. Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over fixed: - I can coast down hills as fast as I want. - I can keep an absolutely silent core while braking hard and shifting my weight back as far as possible (since I can stop my feet while maintaining rear traction at high speed). - All of my energy goes to moving the the bike forward and none of my bicycle's (forward or wheelspin) momentum ever gets wasted on lifting up my feet. - I can spin rpms well into the red zone of my body's capabilities, without worrying about having to keep up with the pedals or being knocked off balance by them if I lose steam. - I am generally more nimble thanks to my ability to stop and start my cranks at any moment I want, in any position I want. Yeah. Singlespeeds suck. Whatever am I thinking "cruising around" NYC traffic on my singlespeed drive train. As far as the dead-zone goes: you are still translating your bike's momentum into pedal momentum, which is energy going the wrong way. It is no harder to continue cycling in the dead zone on a singlespeed, you're just much less likely to lose any energy to bad cycling technique when you are tired. If the dead zone is a problem for you on climbs, you are not strong enough for the gain in your drivetrain given the terrain you are riding on. It just seems that for most people, most of the time, a non-fixed singlespeed makes more sense than fixed. You gain more in practicality and convenience than you lose in simplicity. For that matter and for the same reasons, an IGH probably makes more sense than a dearailleur. I guess that the maximum the possible performance (as measured by mechanical efficiency) is going to be greater with the fixed or derailleur solutions - an advantage that probably shows up only with ideal technique (fixed gear) and optimum adjustment of equipment (derailleur). Help me out folks; does this make sense? |
Singlespeed has more advantages.
But fixed can be more fun. So it depends on what you're doing. /thread |
If you cant make the summit you havent earned the descent. ...maybe that doesnt apply as well to road bikes as compared to mountain. But, as for me, give me a fixed gear!
|
Originally Posted by TejanoTrackie
(Post 11390923)
That's why they invented geared (multi-speed derailleur) bikes. Neither SS or FG is optimal for general distance riding under varied conditions (wind and hills). Use the proper tools for the job at hand.
On flats i see a somewhat snowball effect, momentum gaining you forward. I came from a heavy bmx background. |
Originally Posted by xcameronx
(Post 11426844)
That's more things that can break. I commute with my fixed. It has to be reliable.
|
Originally Posted by xcameronx
(Post 11426844)
...
On flats i see a somewhat snowball effect, momentum gaining you forward... |
I fail to see the point of SS without fixed gear. I guess it'll be more reliable without derailleurs, but other than that, why not just buy a road bike?! If they invented a fixed gear casette for multi speeds I would buy it.
SS just looks sleek... you dont get the FG feel or effect, so its rather stupid IMHO. All the kids on campus went out and got SS bikes cuase they wanted to pretend to be cool without having to learn to ride FG. |
Originally Posted by RoadJerk
(Post 11431794)
I fail to see the point of SS without fixed gear. I guess it'll be more reliable without derailleurs, but other than that, why not just buy a road bike?! If they invented a fixed gear casette for multi speeds I would buy it.
SS just looks sleek... you dont get the FG feel or effect, so its rather stupid IMHO. All the kids on campus went out and got SS bikes cuase they wanted to pretend to be cool without having to learn to ride FG. RABBLERABBLERABBLE |
Originally Posted by RoadJerk
(Post 11431794)
I fail to see the point of SS without fixed gear. I guess it'll be more reliable without derailleurs, but other than that, why not just buy a road bike?! If they invented a fixed gear casette for multi speeds I would buy it.
SS just looks sleek... you dont get the FG feel or effect, so its rather stupid IMHO. All the kids on campus went out and got SS bikes cuase they wanted to pretend to be cool without having to learn to ride FG. Did you completely miss Cab Chaser's list of advantages of SS over derailleur and fixed gears above? A fixed gear is just a single speed than can't coast. |
Originally Posted by RoadJerk
(Post 11431794)
All the kids on campus went out and got FG bikes cuase they wanted to pretend to be cool without having to learn to ride a penny farthing.
All the kids on campus most likely went out and got SS bikes, because that made sense to them and they couldn't possibly give less of a **** what the self proclaimed cool kids think of them. |
Riding a century, especially a mountainous one, on a single speed bike, is a big challenge. If you're doubtful about keeping up w/ the cadence on the decents, I would just ride the whole thing SS. As already mentioned above, SS has many advantages over fixed gear, just as a geared bike has over a single speed one. The reason behind riding on a single gear is the challenge to yourself. I don't think riding fixed will give you any physical advantage other than remind you that you can't stop pedaling. So in terms of difficulty fixed > SS > gears. So you're already challenging yourself by riding SS instead of a geared bike. If you want even more of a challenge, then ride fixed. Choose the most appropriate one for yourself.
|
Have ridden a century on both fixed and singlespeed on the same bike over the same mild terrain. 8% was the steepest grade. Was much more depleted at the end of the fixed ride and it took longer. Couldn't freewheel on descends. Worked the brakes front/rear to keep the rims from heating up and causing a blowout. Would I do it again? Yes, as a matter of fact we're doing one this fall. But, I did the singlespeed ride first and I'm glad I did it that way as it, sort of prepared me for the rigors only having one go to gear.
|
Originally Posted by cab chaser
(Post 11423073)
Care to back that claim up with some evidence?
Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over gears: - No derailleurs to maintain. - Less weight thanks to no detailers, a single chainring and no cassette. - A more durable bike. - A simplified drive train without the additional resistance provided by the upper/lower jockey wheels required by a derailleur system. - No need for asymmetrical wheel dishing to accommodate a cassette, resulting in more durable wheelsets. - Can still coast. Advantages of a singlespeed drivetrain over fixed: - I can coast down hills as fast as I want. - I can keep an absolutely silent core while braking hard and shifting my weight back as far as possible (since I can stop my feet while maintaining rear traction at high speed). - All of my energy goes to moving the the bike forward and none of my bicycle's (forward or wheelspin) momentum ever gets wasted on lifting up my feet. - I can spin rpms well into the red zone of my body's capabilities, without worrying about having to keep up with the pedals or being knocked off balance by them if I lose steam. - I am generally more nimble thanks to my ability to stop and start my cranks at any moment I want, in any position I want. Yeah. Singlespeeds suck. Whatever am I thinking "cruising around" NYC traffic on my singlespeed drive train. As far as the dead-zone goes: you are still translating your bike's momentum into pedal momentum, which is energy going the wrong way. It is no harder to continue cycling in the dead zone on a singlespeed, you're just much less likely to lose any energy to bad cycling technique when you are tired. If the dead zone is a problem for you on climbs, you are not strong enough for the gain in your drivetrain given the terrain you are riding on. - highest efficiency through gearing for climbing, sprinting, speed - higher speeds since you don't spin out as readily - weight is usually a wash since road frames are mostly carbon fiber whereas most SS are aluminum or steel - can still coast Advantages of a Fixed over SS: - can pedal down hills as fast as you want (or can), which will help increase the suppleness of your legs. (disclaimer: not saying it's easy....) - can brake with a combination of hand brakes and legs, useful if your brakes fail, or your hands slip, or can't grab them in time - no coasting, which means no wasted energy or momentum while going forward - no coasting, which will break bad habits of coasting too much - no coasting, which generally means being more mindful, and more awareness of your riding ability, and technique - no coasting, which generally means more awareness of your environment and surroundings (eg. traffic, stop signs, etc.) - the ability to skid - the ability to ride backwards (hmmm...is this an advantage? lol) - more challenging |
The advantage of a fixed gear drive train is: some people like the way that it feels, it will probably improve pedaling technique if you need help with that (though you can certainly learn how to pedal correctly on just about any bike), and hipsters will think you are cool. Most of the other "advantages" you listed are pretty much bunk.
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
Advantages of a Fixed over SS:
- can brake with a combination of hand brakes and legs, useful if your brakes fail, or your hands slip, or can't grab them in time
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- no coasting, which means no wasted energy or momentum while going forward
Again: your fixed gear drive train does not magically turn your bike into a perpetual motion machine. There are no perpetual motion machines.
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- no coasting, which will break bad habits of coasting too much
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- no coasting, which generally means being more mindful, and more awareness of your riding ability, and technique
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- no coasting, which generally means more awareness of your environment and surroundings (eg. traffic, stop signs, etc.)
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- the ability to skid
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- the ability to ride backwards (hmmm...is this an advantage? lol)
Originally Posted by kreative
(Post 11435343)
- more challenging
One *real* advantage to riding fixed that you did not mention is that you are able to slow down your bike without having your hands on the handlebars. That is something that cannot be done on a singlespeed drive train. Personally, I like to keep my hands on the bars at all times since the streets are littered with potholes around here and evasive maneuvers are often necessary thanks to careless drivers and spaced-out pedestrians. Another *real* advantage to riding fixed is that you did not mention is the ability to track stand more easily (related to riding backwards). SS (somewhat) limits your ability to track stand, but you can still do it. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:49 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.