Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

46 chainring, thinking about trying 48 t chainring. Any thoughts?

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

46 chainring, thinking about trying 48 t chainring. Any thoughts?

Old 10-19-10, 05:37 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
46 chainring, thinking about trying 48 t chainring. Any thoughts?

I was curious, I'm currently 46/17 and was thinking of trying 48/17. Worth trying, or waste of money and just stay 46/17
rootbeer is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 06:00 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
peazweag's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: albany,oregon
Posts: 350

Bikes: 1973 RALEIGH SUPER COURSE,85 FUI ALLEGRO

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
it depends what your looking to get out of it.is the 46 too easy you will have a bit more speed with a 48.I run a 48x16 set up ,I jumped up from a 44x16..thats a 4 tooth jump.46x16 might be an option too.
peazweag is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 07:27 AM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I don't know, it just seems like 46/17 is nice, but it feels imo like I'm doing a lot of work and not going very fast :/ I live in flat areas with the only hills being a bridge here and there...I might try 46/16
rootbeer is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 09:40 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 332
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I went from 42-16 to 48-17 and I have hills, you should be okay.
leed is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 10:17 AM
  #5  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,054
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
48/17 is my favorite gear ratio. I find it to be very well-rounded for the mild hills (also mostly bridges) where I live.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 10:17 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 220
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Enjoy the negligible difference.
ismellfish2 is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,054
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
The difference won't be huge but adding 3 gear inches should be noticeable.

OP - you'd get more out of keeping 46t up front and changing your cog to 16t.
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 10:48 AM
  #8  
My name is Alex
 
Lilcphoto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PDX
Posts: 1,669

Bikes: Mercier Kilo TT Stripper in RAW, Schwinn Madison 2008 Blue, Leader 725tr, Brassknuckle, Leader 722, Traitor Ruben

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
In Portland here I went with 46-16 from the stock kilo 48-16 and it definitely helps with all of the stop n' go's that I encounter... That being said, I say try and find a cheap 48t chain ring (or a bike with that gearing) and try it out...
Lilcphoto is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 11:28 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well, I wanted to try 48/17 because the sram omnionomnomnom's come with a 48 chainring. Granted I can change the chainring to another brand, 46 but - think ill give 48 a try.
rootbeer is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 11:33 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
bhop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,894

Bikes: Bianchi Via Nirone 7, Jamis Sputnik

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride 46-16 with a few hills. If it were flat, i'd definitely bump it up some.
bhop is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 11:33 AM
  #11  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I ride a 700x23c wheel, 170mm crank, and a 48*16 gear (single speed only)

I normally cruise at 19-22mph, max out at about 32-34 before I spin out.

I live in a relatively flat area with some rolling hills if I choose to ride them. I really like the gear, but occasionally swap to a 50*16. The two tooth jump for me (in my case from 48-50) is significant enough that from a standing start I can feel the higher strain. I can curise a little less easy since the extra few teeth in front at my normal cadence run at around 20mph on the low end.... which makes me "try" a bit too hard for my liking.

My opinion is that the two teeth in front will mean, given the same cadence I ride about .5 mph faster, but have to try a bit harder, and increases my max speed enough to be noticable. It also makes stop-light starts a little more work, and I can actually feel the difference in time it takes me to get up to speed.

Hope this information helps.
Hirohsima is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 12:48 PM
  #12  
Old fart
 
JohnDThompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Appleton WI
Posts: 24,934

Bikes: Several, mostly not name brands.

Mentioned: 153 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 3571 Post(s)
Liked 3,366 Times in 1,915 Posts
What's wrong with the 46? Going from 46 to 48 isn't much of a change. Get a 47 and then you'll always have maximum skid patches regardless of what cog you use.
JohnDThompson is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 01:47 PM
  #13  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,301
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 12 Times in 1 Post
cogs are cheap. keep the 46 ring and do a 16t cog. i really like 46x16/17 (in/out of form, in my local rolling hills) as a gear choice.

Last edited by dookie; 10-19-10 at 08:09 PM.
dookie is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 02:31 PM
  #14  
Constant tinkerer
 
FastJake's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 7,954
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 185 Post(s)
Liked 92 Times in 75 Posts
One other thing to think about is chain length. When you change gearing your wheel will move in the dropouts. But two teeth is a pretty minor change and shouldn't force you to change your chain length, unless you're already at one extreme.

Originally Posted by dookie
cogs are cheap. keep the 46 ring and do a 16t cog.
This.
FastJake is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 04:44 PM
  #15  
Painfully average.
 
calv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,304

Bikes: Caad10 / All-City SP

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Liked 4 Times in 2 Posts
How do you guys ride with those ratios, I'm guessing my ratio 48/16 isn't much different from 46/16 and its tough as hell haha. Maybe I just have weak legs.
calv is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 05:03 PM
  #16  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 1,013
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by calv
How do you guys ride with those ratios, I'm guessing my ratio 48/16 isn't much different from 46/16 and its tough as hell haha. Maybe I just have weak legs.
Depends on the bike, how far you plan on going, your condition, the terrain.

Some guys here actually ride on the track.

My SS is ~17lbs and I only do 20mile training rides.

48x16 in tennis shoes and baggy jeans on a 25lb bike is very different than the same gear on a 17lb bike, in an uber-dork spandex kit (what I ride in), with carbon soled shoes and clipless pedals. It may not be you,... it may just be your intent.
Hirohsima is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 05:05 PM
  #17  
.
 
xavier853's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Columbus
Posts: 2,027

Bikes: Pegueot UO8, Tommaso Augusta

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
hell go to 49t
xavier853 is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 05:28 PM
  #18  
We haven't located us yet
 
nealjoslyn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Idaho
Posts: 168

Bikes: Hong Fu, Mercier Kilo tt, Cannondale 2.8, Takara Grand Touring

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
I went from 46x16 to 46x17 and noticed a huge difference. There are a lot of hills (big ones) around here so 46x17 is better, but sometimes I feel like I'm spinning pretty fast, especially downhill. If you don't have any serious hills to deal with, 48x17 might even be lower than what you want (depending on how you ride). I'd probably just go with 46x16 or higher. Oh and cogs tend to be cheaper than chainrings (in my experience).

Last edited by nealjoslyn; 10-19-10 at 05:29 PM. Reason: (in my experience)
nealjoslyn is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 06:32 PM
  #19  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
See this is what sucks, the SRAM Ormoiaoaonomnomnom's only come 48 chainring crankset. I have a feeling I might like 48/17...

The sugino messenger I heard is a kind of a waste and I might as well buy the Sram Ormonomnomnoms... I just really want a new crankset. Why? Heck, why do people buy Aerospokes, or Chris King Headsets, or Brooks B17's. I just want to buy some nice parts for my bike
rootbeer is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 07:34 PM
  #20  
Your cog is slipping.
 
Scrodzilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 26,054
Mentioned: 41 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 640 Post(s)
Liked 100 Times in 58 Posts
I happen to like the SRAM S300 better than Ominominominominominoms. Less money too.


https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...s.php?id=26702
Scrodzilla is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 08:01 PM
  #21  
a bored kid
 
hpmcardle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: East Lansing, MI
Posts: 177

Bikes: Year unknown CCM Targa conversion

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
It totally depends on terrain. I ride 48-15 because my town is flat as a pancake. Why don't y'all like Sugino cranks?
hpmcardle is offline  
Old 10-19-10, 08:23 PM
  #22  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
I happen to like the SRAM S300 better than Ominominominominominoms. Less money too.


https://www.universalcycles.com/shopp...s.php?id=26702

Bro..bro...bro...those are nice, but I want 1/8. I need dem + tarck points son!
rootbeer is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 12:18 AM
  #23  
Rawr
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 186
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rootbeer
Bro..bro...bro...those are nice, but I want 1/8. I need dem + tarck points son!
bro, labeled by universal cycles with "courier". That gives you mad street cred.
Dinosaur88 is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 03:55 AM
  #24  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 3,651

Bikes: Too many bikes, too little time to ride

Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 424 Post(s)
Liked 442 Times in 303 Posts
i have the s300 on the kilo (46/16) and the omniums on the gtb (48/17). i will have to say that 1) the omniums are stiffer than the s300 (1/8" vs 3/32"; 144bcd vs 130bcd), and 2) 46/16 and 48/17 are really close in terms of gear inches, and both are good all-around gear ratios for street use/commuting. it allows you to tackle the occasional hill, and still push 20+mph on flats. 46/17 is a good gear for street use/commuting as well, but you're more likely get dropped on a group ride (whereas with the 46/16 or 48/17, you at least have a shot at hugging the wheel in front of you).
tFUnK is offline  
Old 10-20-10, 05:58 AM
  #25  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
rootbeer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: South Flori-duh!
Posts: 180
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tFUnK
i have the s300 on the kilo (46/16) and the omniums on the gtb (48/17). i will have to say that 1) the omniums are stiffer than the s300 (1/8" vs 3/32"; 144bcd vs 130bcd), and 2) 46/16 and 48/17 are really close in terms of gear inches, and both are good all-around gear ratios for street use/commuting. it allows you to tackle the occasional hill, and still push 20+mph on flats. 46/17 is a good gear for street use/commuting as well, but you're more likely get dropped on a group ride (whereas with the 46/16 or 48/17, you at least have a shot at hugging the wheel in front of you).


Hrmm thanks. That's pretty helpful!
rootbeer is offline  

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.