![]() |
Originally Posted by clink83
(Post 12529303)
It's 2010, going back to an obsolete, heavy, flexible design is silly.
|
Oh, the irony of it. You would think after 4 months I would write the correct year!
|
So I think I'm gonna go with the andels. Do you think the silver will match the fork since its not chrome?
|
Yes. Go with silver.
|
what don't you like about the gimondis?
|
They are not stiff and the chainring is too small. I can't find a bigger chainring either.
|
Don't build a bike you love.
Someone will take it from you and all that will be left is sorrow. |
Originally Posted by avner
(Post 12530049)
Don't build a bike you love.
Someone will take it from you and all that will be left is sorrow. I would fight anyone who would try to take my bike |
Damn, av - judging by the way you talked about it, I thought you were unhappy with your Leader.
|
Originally Posted by ismai1
(Post 12530092)
I would fight anyone who would try to take my bike
|
Originally Posted by ismai1
(Post 12529867)
They are not stiff and the chainring is too small. I can't find a bigger chainring either.
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12530107)
The IRD Defiants may look similar but in my experience with them, I find them to be exceptionally stiff and a much better crankset all around.
to the dude who's bike was stolen - I'm sorry. How did it get stolen? scrod I too would win. been boxing for a while. |
why do you think the gimondi's are not stiff? Have you tried them on the frame or are you just guessing?
|
Originally Posted by Lilcphoto
(Post 12528459)
I just swapped a square taper bb for a GXP, and I have to say, the GXP is soo much easier to work with, easier to get in and out, and on the plus, if something gets stripped, you can still get a GXP style BB out a lot easier than a square taper
Originally Posted by clink83
(Post 12529303)
It's 2010, going back to an obsolete, heavy, flexible design is silly.
really, i'd just go on looks. |
Originally Posted by toosahn
(Post 12530985)
why do you think the gimondi's are not stiff? Have you tried them on the frame or are you just guessing?
yeah I used them. |
Originally Posted by ismai1
(Post 12529867)
they are not stiff and the chainring is too small. I can't find a bigger chainring either.
|
Yeah, man...130bcd is a tough size to find.
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12530098)
Damn, av - judging by the way you talked about it, I thought you were unhappy with your Leader.
as for the bike being stolen? It was locked to itself, behind a few bikes in someones yard at a party. From what I was told it sounds like some ghetto kid from the neighborhood walked in, picked it up and walked away with U-lock still attached. No one thought to say anything. |
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12531291)
Yeah, man...130bcd is a tough size to find.
i did not mean it like i could not find one that wouldnt fit, it's just I can't find any with that same style.:( damn dude, well you know if they walked in they have to live within walking distance. i'm sure you've already checked CL but keep tryin! |
|
damn thats almost identical. Do those chain rings hold up well? I was never really a fan of origin 8 either... I wonder if it'll look stupid since the arms are pretty shiney, almost like chrome and thats a dullish silver. but thanks dude, i havent purchased anything yet so I'm looking for as many options as possible. On FSA's website about the crank it states they have different teeth combinations but I can't find any.
http://www.fullspeedahead.com/products/109/FGimondi Teeth combination: 46, 48 Or is that something different? I'll shoot FSA an email later today and ask them. |
From what people have said Origin 8 is decent. It means the cranks are available with either 46 or 48 teeth when you buy them (depending on weather the spot you're buying from stocks them)
|
Origin 8 is a crapshoot - some of their stuff is okay and some of it is complete garbage. I just happen to be aware of some of the inner workings of that company and am not a fan of how they conduct business, which is why I am biased.
I've never seen that chainring up close. |
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12533118)
I just happen to be aware of some of the inner workings of that company and am not a fan of how they conduct business, which is why I am biased.
|
I suppose I may have opened a can of worms but I really don't want to start ****.
|
Originally Posted by LupinIII
(Post 12531043)
going to have to say the crank arms and steel frame are going to be flexing much more than the crank axle, whether it's square taper or gxp. |
awwwwwwwww man. No fair.
|
Originally Posted by clink83
(Post 12533665)
All the force from your crank arms is acting on that BB..that's where you're going to get the most flex. Do you really think a big Al crank arm is going to bend before the tiny little square that the crank attaches to does?
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12533635)
I suppose I may have opened a can of worms but I really don't want to start ****.
|
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 12533635)
I suppose I may have opened a can of worms but I really don't want to start ****.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:04 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.