![]() |
Originally Posted by paktinat
(Post 12963662)
33% grade, for reference:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4004/...94c974f3c9.jpg But if you keep your effort level constant and allow your speed to fall as you climb, you get less tired, which is something. |
Originally Posted by EssEllSee
(Post 12964176)
Agreed, aside from street cred, I see no reason for riding a fixed gear in a place like SF. I would go geared (and I love fixed more than anything).
IMO SF ain't got **** on Seattle, mainly cause the hills in SF can be avoided to go most places you want to go....not so true in Seattle. Yeah, we got mad street credz here! |
Originally Posted by Jaytron
(Post 12964727)
Is there even a percent or two difference between SS and roadie? I guess maybe between fixed and roadie.
But it's also likely that the fixed has loose toe clips that you can't even pull up with, whereas the roadie will have clipless pedals :P A planetary/internal gear hub is more in the 93% range, unless you get into the $1,000+ Rohloff stuff. So going from 98% to say 99%, won't really be too apperent to the rider, while not being able to shift will make a world of difference in feel. |
Originally Posted by scroca
(Post 12963160)
There is no law against walking a hill, regardless of what all these htfu guys imply.
You say you just started and you intend to lose weight. It will take time. Keep at it and get as far as you can each ride. Eventually you may be able to get all the way up without walking. If not, there is no law against walking a hill... |
Originally Posted by ianjk
(Post 12962885)
If I take the track bike out, I need to walk the last three blocks (of a 8 block hill) on the ride home. 48x18 (way too high). My other bike is 38x17 and it is still a workout.
|
Originally Posted by zoltani
(Post 12965243)
IMO SF ain't got **** on Seattle, mainly cause the hills in SF can be avoided to go most places you want to go....not so true in Seattle.
Yeah, we got mad street credz here! there is no way around it if you need to ride downtown.. 38x20 would be the only way i could imagine doing it fixed. instead, i just take long routes around and attack my downtown targets from easier (yet longer away) trajectory |
Originally Posted by paktinat
(Post 12963662)
33% grade, for reference:
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4004/...94c974f3c9.jpg To everyone who says to change my gearing, I've been planning on it, just ran out of money for this project. I'm going to go with a 53:20 which should be the in between a 44:16 and 44:17. as long as the number of teeth on a cog is linearly equivalent to the cogs diameter. Does anyone know whether this is true or not? I've been wondering about it while doing calculations to see what gearing I should get that would be easiest on the budget and not having to replace the crank is always a cheaper solution so staying at a 53T chainring with a different rear cog size would be the best option for me. |
Originally Posted by zoltani
(Post 12965243)
IMO SF ain't got **** on Seattle, mainly cause the hills in SF can be avoided to go most places you want to go....not so true in Seattle.
Yeah, we got mad street credz here! |
Well my touring bike has a 22-32-42 crank on it.....
It's nice to have options. |
Originally Posted by zoltani
(Post 12965431)
Well my touring bike has a 22-32-42 crank on it.....
It's nice to have options. |
Originally Posted by dsprehe89
(Post 12965505)
That is what my MTB has on it, along with a shimano mega range rear cassette. :lol: It can conquer some hill... but sucks for road use.
http://gallery.me.com/aaronshort1/10...12948105370001 though I do use this bike for regular road use |
Originally Posted by jdgesus
(Post 12965333)
seattle has the most hilly downtown core of any US city.
there is no way around it if you need to ride downtown.. 38x20 would be the only way i could imagine doing it fixed. instead, i just take long routes around and attack my downtown targets from easier (yet longer away) trajectory I ran 48x20 but now I ride the road bike round town. |
Originally Posted by dsprehe89
(Post 12961231)
I know this sounds pathetic, but do any of you ever just walk you SS/FG up hills instead of just forcing through?
Last summer, I used a SS bike in the desert because I thought SS was fine for endless flatness. It is. It is not fine for endless headwind. I learned that I would have much better off bringing my road bike. :P |
Originally Posted by andrizzle
(Post 12965285)
biking in duluth is like swimming in the north sea
|
i did lunges today after not doing them for 2 years. amazing how i immediately noticed the development of more muscle capacity on the ride home from the gym.
|
Originally Posted by toosahn
(Post 12966383)
i did lunges today after not doing them for 2 years. amazing how i immediately noticed the development of more muscle capacity on the ride home from the gym.
|
Originally Posted by Jaytron
(Post 12964727)
Is there even a percent or two difference between SS and roadie? I guess maybe between fixed and roadie.
But it's also likely that the fixed has loose toe clips that you can't even pull up with, whereas the roadie will have clipless pedals :P I think we could all go back and forth about differences in torque and acceleration between ss and multi-speeds. but really its about what kind of engine is behind that machine. and theres a supercharger ready to ride in this one. :love::love::love::love::love::love::love::love: |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:45 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.