Bike Forums

Bike Forums (https://www.bikeforums.net/forum.php)
-   Singlespeed & Fixed Gear (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/)
-   -   IRD Defiant quesion \ confusion... (https://www.bikeforums.net/singlespeed-fixed-gear/784597-ird-defiant-quesion-confusion.html)

Scrodzilla 12-13-11 08:05 AM


Originally Posted by skadoosh (Post 13595309)
I always followed greasing square tapers. Jobst Brandt is in favor of it and his reasons seems to make more sense than the reasons used by those in favor of dry installations.

http://sheldonbrown.com/brandt/installing-cranks.html

http://thelipstickchronicles.typepad...8ee5970c-800wi

For the record, I'm not very fond of Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel either. Big deal.

mconlonx 12-13-11 10:28 AM

Was taught dry at UBI. Know a guy who cracked Topline cranks at the crank taper hole who swore by greasing spindle.

40 Nm, or to crank mfg spec, no grease.

prooftheory 12-13-11 10:53 AM


Originally Posted by Scrodzilla (Post 13595341)
For the record, I'm not very fond of Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel either. Big deal.

I don't think anybody is.

skadoosh 12-13-11 01:14 PM


Originally Posted by prooftheory (Post 13595982)
I don't think anybody is.


Originally Posted by Scrodzilla (Post 13595341)
For the record, I'm not very fond of Brandt's book The Bicycle Wheel either. Big deal.

Just out of curiousity, what dont you like about that book? I used this book to build my first wheelset since that was what my LBS recommended. So I used his book (plus sheldon brown's website) Crap. :(

The basis of my bicycle knowledge comes from Sheldon Brown, Leonard Zinn, and Brandt's articles. Have I been reading the wrong people?

(Note: I am not being sarcastic. I am seriously asking if I have been studying from the wrong people)

prooftheory 12-13-11 01:25 PM

There isn't anything wrong with the book per se. It is just that there are only really like 4 pages of it that are actually useful. Does anybody really need outdated calculations of spoke strength?

It is awesome that somebody finally decided to apply some science to the problem of wheel building but it doesn't really help most people build wheels.

skadoosh 12-13-11 01:34 PM


Originally Posted by prooftheory (Post 13596802)
There isn't anything wrong with the book per se. It is just that there are only really like 4 pages of it that are actually useful. Does anybody really need outdated calculations of spoke strength?

It is awesome that somebody finally decided to apply some science to the problem of wheel building but it doesn't really help most people build wheels.

Thanks goodness. Hopefully my wheel wont explode under me.

I actually liked all the science-y stuff. Since I never built a wheel before, it was nice to see the theory behind why things were done the way they were done.

mconlonx 12-13-11 01:51 PM


Originally Posted by prooftheory (Post 13596802)
It is awesome that somebody finally decided to apply some science to the problem of wheel building but it doesn't really help most people build wheels.

Some people do better with the techy stuff; some people do better with an artsy-fartsy approach. To the latter, Brandt is anathema -- suggest Gerd Schraner's The Art of Wheelbuilding instead.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.