![]() |
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
(Post 13842090)
I've always wondered why 48T rings are so popular. If you run a ring with a prime number tooth count, e.g. 47T, you will always get the maximum number of skid patches regardless of your cog tooth count.
|
Originally Posted by pablosnazzy
(Post 13841039)
oh, and you use brakes? HTFU
|
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
(Post 13842090)
I've always wondered why 48T rings are so popular. If you run a ring with a prime number tooth count, e.g. 47T, you will always get the maximum number of skid patches regardless of your cog tooth count.
48/16 for warmups 48/15 for beginner racing 48/14 for racing 48/13 for elite racing I use my 48t more than any other ring. |
I'm running a 46/18 for 67.21/2.56 currently. I'll step down to a 46/16 to break 78.90 in a month or so, depending on traffic. I'm pretty content with the 46 I have currently and don't foresee changing it on my Handsome. However, the bike I've got on my radar in June has a 42/16 setup, so that may very well be swapped to a 48/15, all things considering.
|
I just realized OP told someone to HTFU for using brakes when he can't even skid 48/16.
Know your place. The answer to the question is 'sorta.' The lower the gearing, the easier it will be to lock up the wheel. Also, you will want to consider the number of skid spots. If you're trying to skid a lot and you want a lower gearing, you'll probably want to get 48/19. |
got a 17t cog, now i can somewhat skid at will. thanks for the help.
|
I need to figure out a way to market this to the jackass crowd. Carefully aligning it over the back tire should make skidding a breeze for even the least capable (i.e. the typical SSFG poster.)
And in closing, pull your pants up and a get a job, losers. |
Htfu.
|
|
Originally Posted by carleton
(Post 13843554)
48t is common on the track.
48/16 for warmups 48/15 for beginner racing 48/14 for racing 48/13 for elite racing I use my 48t more than any other ring. |
Just use a 17tooth cog and be done with it. They are much easier to find than a 47 tooth ring.
|
I've always thought my legs were pretty strong, but the ratios you guys use makes me feel weak. I'm running 42/17, which can be a little spinny at times, but has me working up hills. And we don't even have real hills in Louisiana. Anyway, for all you 46+/16- peeps, respect.
|
This thread did not disappoint.
|
Originally Posted by JohnDThompson
(Post 13846380)
Sure, but track riders don't make a habit of skidding. For people who do like to skid, a prime number tooth count is best, and 47T is only trivially lower than 48T.
|
Originally Posted by Cynikal
(Post 13846477)
Just use a 17tooth cog and be done with it. They are much easier to find than a 47 tooth ring.
http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/f...d/IMG_0087.jpg http://www.bikeforums.net/showthread...oing-FS-thread |
I don't think I'd ever refer to 47t chainrings as "hard to find".
|
i'm not convinced people actually know what skid patches are after reading this thread.
|
Originally Posted by Nuggetross
(Post 13847830)
i'm not convinced people actually know what skid patches are after reading this thread.
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:07 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.