![]() |
yea you right
|
Spin to win my friends.
|
Originally Posted by redpear
(Post 13853717)
I'm not sure how much riding you've done around these parts, but I feel like if it were even possible, my knees would go before my muscles would get bigger.
Velodromes are designed to be perfectly level, so its an even playing ground for all the riders. I'm sure you would smoke my ass because you're in SF, and you should have to deal with much harder grades on a more regular basis than at least I do. |
Originally Posted by redpear
(Post 13853714)
I don't think it's worth it to run over 80 GI in San Francisco.
Spinning is good training. And it's good for your knees. |
Originally Posted by muckymucky
(Post 13853759)
i am TOTALLY doing it wrong.
|
Originally Posted by muckymucky
(Post 13853759)
i am TOTALLY doing it wrong.
|
Hahahaha nice.
(assuming it was lower)(also assuming if you're trying to call him out.) |
haha, no I'm legitimately curious.
if he was like 85 gi it would make sense that we 'launched up that hill' as he said. |
Originally Posted by redpear
(Post 13853765)
What GI were you running on that monday ride?
or my bag full of work crap, and heavy camera, and not clipless with my vans, and aerospokes, and a full day of soreness of snowboarding the day before, and it was raining when i got to mission, and totally irving. => guy's a saint doe~ |
I could still see that ratio being tough in SF.
Props to anyone in hilly areas. |
Originally Posted by muckymucky
(Post 13853773)
oh psh, just did the gear app. im only 76GI on the 49x17 commuter gear. phew! so it was just my crap legs that failed. or irving at directions...
I'm pretty slow and I need my slow ratio. I didn't mean to knock at you. See you next monday, yeah? edit: and I forgot that giant ass commuter bag too. crazy, might as well be touring :P |
omg i just remembered next monday no bay bridge! but also no work! => its the post-alleycat davisfixed snowboarding trip =<
|
it's like we live two separate lives divided by rivaling families :'(
|
its called a divorce => and we're the kids in between
|
Originally Posted by GMJ
(Post 13853712)
I just feel like if you're going to ride a fixed gear, why not run the highest ratio you can safely slow down on as well the highest you can handle? It only makes you stronger, which logically, will make you faster. At the very least, you'll be able to run higher gearings after a while and then just spin at a comfortable cadence while bombing down hills going ludicrous speed. And your bike will look cooler.
I do climb a lot in the Hollywood hills and have gone out with guys riding larger gears. Looks cool, wish I could, doesnt happen. |
Originally Posted by muckymucky
(Post 13853790)
its called a divorce => and we're the kids in between
|
Yeah. From what I've come to understand, there's definitely an ideal gear ratio for a particular rider and his particular circumstances.
I have the luxury of having a relatively flat area, so changes in gear inches are not as drastic terms of difficulty for me. I run 46x15 and will soon be running a 48t up front. Eventually, I want to see that cog go down to 13t (too lazy to check if they make those). When I top out (assuming I make it) to a really tall gear, I can then play around to find my "optimum mega fixed gear ratio". |
salt flats speed records!
|
A boy can dream...
|
Originally Posted by GMJ
(Post 13853757)
No I'm well aware of the flatness of my area. My point being, I like to ride as high as a ratio that I can handle safely so I am constantly working on getting stronger. This is all relative to the topography of your area.
Then, when I switched to SSFG, I kept the small ratio that came on the bike, 42/17. Not only did riding become more pleasurable, but I got a much better workout spinning at a higher cadence than I ever did by mashing on a super high gear. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.