![]() |
delete
|
Originally Posted by Ziemas
(Post 14095939)
Exactly. PW hub bearings are built to a higher standard in terms of water resistance than their aftermarket bearings. As a wet weather commuter I find this very important. Before I switched to PW hubs I was changing bearings at least once a year, I'm on my fifth year (I think fifth...) riding PW and my hubs still spin like new.
|
Originally Posted by max-a-mill
(Post 14114570)
yeah what i am saying is you can buy those (phil) bearings for any hub...
|
|
So the PW stock bearings are the same PW bearings that I can buy, right?
|
They have different dimensions guys.
|
You mean they're not 3D like the rest of the physical world???
|
welcome to the multiverse...
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14115261)
You mean they're not 3D like the rest of the physical world???
|
[IMG]********************************data/media/2/maxwell_smart__confused.gif[/IMG]
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14115261)
You mean they're not 3D like the rest of the physical world???
|
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14115241)
|
Originally Posted by Ziemas
(Post 14117112)
My bad for actually trying to post good info on BF SS/FG. I neglected to take into account that it's mostly populated by pretentious children try to seem too clever on the internet. Carry on, kids, and have a nice ride!
|
Originally Posted by Ziemas
(Post 14117112)
My bad for actually trying to post good info on BF SS/FG. I neglected to take into account that it's mostly populated by pretentious children try to seem too clever on the internet. Carry on, kids, and have a nice ride!
Anyway, I heard you can put Phil bearings in any hub. Any truth to that? |
well the good stuff I've tried and liked is/are
Dura-Ace Phil Yobi not in any order I've also ridden Miche and Formula and Gran Compe those are ell meh compared to the top 3 so for now my list is top 3 |
Originally Posted by Ziemas
(Post 14114961)
One more time. The bearings that PW puts in their hubs have much better water resistance than the after market bearings that they sell for non-PW hubs.
...if you have to replace your PW bearings when they eventually wear out, does Phil Wood check to see if they should screw you over by giving you their lesser bearings, or are you given a special order item of quality bearings again? It seems like that would hurt them financially having to produce and maintain a different set for different customers. I'd wager whatever "improvement" you're seeing between the two has to do with the actual fitment of the bearing into their hub more than them intentionally sabotaging their own product to appear better. It probably has to do with their inability to manage the quality control of Shimano, Formula, Surly directly. So while they can test fit the bearing to a degree, they can't fine tune that bearing to a valid pool of hubs. Sometimes pretentious has more to do with not wanting to be so dry as to be uninteresting. |
Originally Posted by Scrodzilla
(Post 14069593)
Yeah, my Phil hub always slid forward regardless of how tight I had the bolts.
http://www.popcrunch.com/wp-content/...2/Hated-It.jpg +1 I'll never use hubs with Allen bolts on a rear wheel again. |
How can you rank hubs without knowing their application?
There's not much point in comparing a Dura-Ace track hub to a sealed-bearing Phil hub for instance, they're for totally different applications. |
Originally Posted by Santaria
(Post 14118313)
All joking aside - yes, we get what you're saying. Phil Woods intentionally has two standards for which they produce and sell their bearings. But, my only question is this....
...if you have to replace your PW bearings when they eventually wear out, does Phil Wood check to see if they should screw you over by giving you their lesser bearings, or are you given a special order item of quality bearings again? It seems like that would hurt them financially having to produce and maintain a different set for different customers. I'd wager whatever "improvement" you're seeing between the two has to do with the actual fitment of the bearing into their hub more than them intentionally sabotaging their own product to appear better. It probably has to do with their inability to manage the quality control of Shimano, Formula, Surly directly. So while they can test fit the bearing to a degree, they can't fine tune that bearing to a valid pool of hubs. Sometimes pretentious has more to do with not wanting to be so dry as to be uninteresting. |
application?
Originally Posted by tashi
(Post 14118475)
How can you rank hubs without knowing their application?
There's not much point in comparing a Dura-Ace track hub to a sealed-bearing Phil hub for instance, they're for totally different applications. |
Well, yeah they do, but Phils would be "better" on the road vs. DA and DA "better" on the track than Phils. How can you "rank" them against each other without knowing what they're for?
So, Santaria, what are you going to use them for? |
comparison
Originally Posted by tashi
(Post 14122761)
How can you "rank" them against each other without knowing what they're for?
price weight material looks observed quality features etc... |
Originally Posted by tashi
(Post 14122761)
Well, yeah they do, but Phils would be "better" on the road vs. DA and DA "better" on the track than Phils. How can you "rank" them against each other without knowing what they're for?
So, Santaria, what are you going to use them for? tl;dr to many micro-threads about hubs (and BBs, etc) where people want to know why they should be a better option than another. This would be a good place to start. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:48 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.