![]() |
Originally Posted by noodle soup
(Post 18775743)
Drive around Sun City someday. Right on Red is completely legal, but few drivers do so.
Arizona drivers also can't figure out the "keep right except to pass" logic either. Drives me nuts. |
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
(Post 18775556)
I have never lived anywhere that you couldn't turn right on a red.
Only at intersections where it's posted not to. No free rights in NYC (unless it's changed since I was out there) |
Yield? Unless posted prohibiting a right turn on red, you're supposed to come to a complete stop before making a right turn on a red.
|
Yeah, he phrased that incorrectly...think he meant complete stop.
But yeah, I know in NYC, even if you're stopped on a red and there is no pedestrians, it's still illegal to turn on a red. Like I said earlier, that was a tough one to break into my Brooklyn friend's head after coming to CA...he would sit in the right lane on a red with his turn signal on and I would have to yell at him to just turn. It felt so unnatural to him because driving in NY, it becomes ingrained in your head. |
Originally Posted by SpeshulEd
(Post 18775987)
I honk at those people.
Arizona drivers also can't figure out the "keep right except to pass" logic either. Drives me nuts. I would do a lot of evening/early morning driving and it's common to just sit in the far left lane cruising at 70mph+ when traffic is light. I would come up to other drivers and most often they would move over. Cars would approach me going 80mph+ and I would move over. Here in Seattle...rarely or never happens. It can be 11pm with light traffic and I'll be cruising in the passing lane only to come up to someone going 55. I don't drive aggressively or ride anyone...but it's obvious to move over when a faster car approaches, especially when the traffic right of you is actually going faster than you while ambling along in the passing lane. But nope, they'll expect you to go around and will refuse to move over. I won't even talk about driving in Vancouver, Canada. I refuse to driving in areas like Richmond...so many near collisions from people that should have never been given a license. Just so many unpredictable inattentive drivers....that whole area needs an extra advanced driving school license. |
Originally Posted by SquidPuppet
(Post 18774489)
I think the cyclist was probably completely surprised. The Cop was in a "Right Turn ONLY" lane. In California, once you enter a "commitment lane" You are not allowed to leave it, period. You can't signal to leave, you can't back up to leave, you can't go straight, you MUST proceed with the action that the lane dictates.
In this case, the combination of speeding up for a light turning orange (and riding at 25mph, according the cyclist himself), probably focused on the light and accelerating (head down?), past stationary cars meant he was not in a position to react. So no, the car should not have pulled out of that lane. But it did. Stuff like that happens. Just like people opening their door (to throw something out, or to get something from the trunk of their car, etc.) Or people (or dogs, even trickier because their small) walking between the cars. Again, yes, it's the cars fault. The cyclist didn't really do anything wrong. But, right though he may be, he's the one that's injured now. As we say in the Netherlands: "you'll have right of way, all the way to the hospital" ;) |
Originally Posted by Ictoanta
(Post 18776870)
As we say in the Netherlands: "you'll have right of way, all the way to the hospital" ;)
Be it motorcycles versus cars or bicycles versus cars, we lose! Right or wrong! |
|
Originally Posted by *****lips
(Post 18776664)
No free rights in NYC (unless it's changed since I was out there)
|
|
|
lots to like up there but my favorite part is definitely the additional rear facing stem. i know it's there for a reason, but i have no idea what the reason is. also +1 on the lock job
|
TBH that is awesome. Did you see it in St. Pete?
|
Originally Posted by pwebb
(Post 18783782)
lots to like up there but my favorite part is definitely the additional rear facing stem. i know it's there for a reason, but i have no idea what the reason is. also +1 on the lock job
|
No, this is in Portland, OR. I do see some high-quality jackassery in St. Pete, though. I should start sharing.
|
No need to lock that up, nothing on the bike worth stealing, let alone the bike itself.
|
The saddle is not level |
It most likely does level out after sitting on that suspension arm.
BTW..anyone ever ride a Softride? What are they like? My bucket of list of riding odd bikes includes a Softride and old Slingshot mountain bike. Not Jackass...actually kind of cool. Just for reference. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3...t/IMG_4171.jpg |
The slingshot is still roughly bike shaped though.
The softride has been hacked together like a kind of semi-tall bike. Look at the extra be shell and the hacked off seat stays. It is a truly unique creation. |
Originally Posted by Robofunc
(Post 18784954)
The slingshot is still roughly bike shaped though.
The softride has been hacked together like a kind of semi-tall bike. Look at the extra be shell and the hacked off seat stays. It is a truly unique creation. |
Originally Posted by Robofunc
(Post 18784954)
The slingshot is still roughly bike shaped though.
The softride has been hacked together like a kind of semi-tall bike. Look at the extra be shell and the hacked off seat stays. It is a truly unique creation. Both are two bikes I would love to hop on just to see how they ride....more of a curiosity. I still see the occasional Softride while out on the commuter trails but I've yet to see a Slingshot in person. Would love to own a Slingshot with anodized Cook Bros everything, Anti Gravity fork, Tioga rear disc, just pure 80s/90s hotness. |
Originally Posted by Regulatori
(Post 18785080)
just pure 80s/90s hotmess.
|
|
So strange
|
1 Attachment(s)
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.