![]() |
Conversion Budget Questions
I apologize if this has been covered before -- a search did not provide me with adequate answers.
I've read Sheldon's article and I'm convinced I'd both enjoy and benefit from riding fixed gear. I have a $400 budget, which could buy me a Kilo TT. But, I have a 1983 Trek 400 which I could convert, allowing me to spend the money on better components while saving up for a better frame. Which would you recommend? My next question is, if converting is best, on which parts should I spend my budget? I know I'd at least be buying an entire new rear wheel and a chainring (the Trek currently has a 52t and 42t, and I'd like a 46 or 48), and I'm thinking I should spend the rest on a crankset, a BB and a front wheel (so, buy a wheelset). I do not want to skimp on quality (anymore than is necessary with a $400 budget), and I'd like a balance of durability and low-weight in a wheelset. Currently, I'm looking at the Sugino RD2, its companion BB, and Mavic cxp 22's w/ formula hubs. FWIW, I'll be commuting about 100 miles a week on the bike in an urban area (I deliver for Jimmy Johns and bike to class, publix, etc). Any and all advice is welcome. Thanks |
Keep the Trek as is, buy the Kilo, have two bieks.
|
All you really need is the rear wheel, a fixed cog, and the lockring,
|
Seau -- Just for the benefit of having two bikes? or is the Kilo's frame enough of an upgrade from the Trek to outweigh having the upgraded wheels, cranks and bb?
I ask because having two bikes isn't much incentive for me personally. storck -- true, and that's what I meant by entire rear wheel, but I'm willing to spend the full $400 so I figured I would make some additional upgrades. |
Originally Posted by nixky1
(Post 15368715)
having two bikes isn't much incentive for me personally.
|
I'd sell the Trek and buy a Kilo WT, get some fenders and a sick front rack.
Pretty much anything is going to be an improvement over a 30 year old frame. |
Originally Posted by Spoonrobot
(Post 15369208)
Pretty much anything is going to be an improvement over a 30 year old frame.
$400 could get you a pretty decent wheelset like you listed and some nicer brake levers/calipers with new cables, plus maybe an extra thing or two. You would have a great, reliable bike. Don't bother with the crankset, just get a 14 or 15 tooth cog to match with the 42 tooth chainring if you feel like 42 x 16 is too low of a gearing, which it probably isn't. |
I'd convert the Trek and then when you decide that FG isn't ideal for delivering Jimmy John's and hauling a load of groceries, you can convert it back.
Personally, I'd keep both brakes, and redish the existing rear wheel. |
Originally Posted by mparker326
(Post 15371143)
I'd convert the Trek and then when you decide that FG isn't ideal for delivering Jimmy John's and hauling a load of groceries, you can convert it back.
Personally, I'd keep both brakes, and redish the existing rear wheel. If the Trek is currently a good, working bicycle I would buy a separate bike to get your fixie jollies. A Trek from that era is a great workhorse, no need to reduce its utility. |
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:26 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.