![]() |
Originally Posted by FixednotBroken
Over the summer and fall of 2004, T.A. surveyed 254 people walking and biking over the Williamsburg Bridge. The survey reveals that the two-inch high bumps caused:
* * * * 32% of bridge users to avoid crossing the Williamsburg Bridge hmmmm.... |
I dont mind the covers, as noted, they serve as speed bumps which while I may not like them, I dont necessarily see them as a bad thing. What I have much bigger issue with is the jackpole who poured the concrete on the bike path on the brooklyn downhill section. On an aluminum langster, Ive never had my body shaken as much as flying down that section of the bridge. Id take a smooth path with a bump in it over that nonsense anyday.
|
HexagonSun: 32% of survey respondants said that sometimes the bumps cause them to avoid using the Williamsburg brigde cyclist/pedestrian path. For example, Bill usually rides to work over the Williamsburg bridge, but riding over the bumps has given him a terrible sprained wrist. While his wrist heals, he uses the less conveniently located Manhattan bridge because the bumps on the WBB aggravate his condition.
Neptunetitan: You're right about the brooklyn-side path. It's bad too. The WBB pedestrian/cyclist path was poorly planned. We're focusing on getting the bumps removed because they're more dangerous, with 23% of bridge path users crashing or tripping and falling because of them. Hopefully, when that's accomplished, we can move on to improving the rest of the path. |
Originally Posted by dgs
HexagonSun: 32% of survey respondants said that sometimes the bumps cause them to avoid using the Williamsburg brigde cyclist/pedestrian path. For example, Bill usually rides to work over the Williamsburg bridge, but riding over the bumps has given him a terrible sprained wrist. While his wrist heals, he uses the less conveniently located Manhattan bridge because the bumps on the WBB aggravate his condition.
|
has anyone else noticed the ridiculous signs posted on the bridge in the last two days? they're absolutely inane - they picture a pathetic diagram of how to ride the bumps on the bridge... as if that was our problem with them. seems to me like a crappy 'legal disclaimer' to prevent any more lawsuits.
what a pile o' dookie. |
Originally Posted by dgs
Interestingly, Chris X (perpetual NYC mayoral candidate) claims that it owuld be more cost-effecient to just make mass transit free, i.e. the moeny collected from riders is less than the amount necessary to supply metro cards, metro card vending machines, turnstiles, turnstile upkeep, etc. I haven't seen the numbers, but it's definitely an interesting idea I'd like to explore further.
|
Originally Posted by FixednotBroken
has anyone else noticed the ridiculous signs posted on the bridge in the last two days? they're absolutely inane - they picture a pathetic diagram of how to ride the bumps on the bridge... as if that was our problem with them. seems to me like a crappy 'legal disclaimer' to prevent any more lawsuits.
what a pile o' dookie. wanna make our own signs depicting people in peril and paste them over it all? :D |
i'd like to see those signs, but i avoid the WB like the plague (because of those stupid bumps, of course).
|
Originally Posted by ch0mb0
wanna make our own signs depicting people in peril and paste them over it all? :D
|
Originally Posted by FNB
um, yes. i like this idea. got any design skillz?
that's pretty much what I do. (that, and the bike thing) did this poster below for a f*cked-up film satirizing school shootings, already using the sign idea http://www.uploadhouse.com/images/89...ck!poster2.jpg . |
|
I feel guilty for LOL'ing to that.
Nice work! |
thats what we need to see up in there! :D
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:37 AM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.