Go Back  Bike Forums > Bike Forums > Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
Reload this Page >

Stuck in between Surly Steamroller sizes. Size up or down?

Notices
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear "I still feel that variable gears are only for people over forty-five. Isn't it better to triumph by the strength of your muscles than by the artifice of a derailer? We are getting soft...As for me, give me a fixed gear!"-- Henri Desgrange (31 January 1865 - 16 August 1940)

Stuck in between Surly Steamroller sizes. Size up or down?

Old 08-04-14, 09:34 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Stuck in between Surly Steamroller sizes. Size up or down?

I know I'm supposed to consult the fit calculator, but my results were inconclusive.

I'm buying a Surly Steamroller, and I'm not sure if I should go with the 53 (54.7tt) or the 56 (56.8tt). I'm 5'9-10 and have an inseam of around 31.5. I'm currently on a 56 Windsor the Hour which has a 53 seat tube with a handful of seat post showing. The 56tt feels okay, but I'm worried that the longer top tube of the Steamroller will be too long. At the same time I'm worried that the 54.7 will be too short. I do like the feel of smaller bikes, but I'm not sure if the 54.7tt will be too small.

If it matters I will mostly be riding with zero-drop bullhorns.
ThurberMingus is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 09:42 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,063

Bikes: Waterford, Salsa, Rivendell

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
probably the 54.7 if you're going bullhorns
Wspsux is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I also use risers and drops occasionally, but bullhorns are my favorite. 54.7 and a long stem should be fine then?
ThurberMingus is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 10:26 AM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Vermont
Posts: 1,063

Bikes: Waterford, Salsa, Rivendell

Mentioned: 8 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 218 Post(s)
Liked 26 Times in 14 Posts
Best to get on both sizes for a ride if you're in between. Only way I'd feel comfortable making the purchase BUT I'm neurotic.
Wspsux is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 11:09 AM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
50voltphantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: SD
Posts: 2,745

Bikes: Handsome Fredward, Trek 1.1

Mentioned: 15 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 481 Post(s)
Liked 131 Times in 47 Posts
Originally Posted by Wspsux
probably the 54.7 if you're going bullhorns
This. If it is a tad short a longer stem will get you where you need to be most likely.

I'm 6' on a 56cm Steamroller. I actually had to change to a short stem when I switched to bullhorns.
50voltphantom is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 11:20 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
heymatthew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 467

Bikes: Nashbar SSCX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I just got a 2012 Masi Uno and went with a 56cm. I'm 6'1ish with a 32" inseam and the 56 felt surprisingly good. Usually a 57 or 58 is my size, but I really liked how the 56 felt with a little more seat height. I don't feel as stretched out and the bike feels tight and nimble, which is how I like my bikes to feel. My last road bike was a 59cm and I always felt a little too stretched out on it.

I'd say go down as you may find that it's easier to make a smaller bike fit easier than it is to make a larger one fit.
heymatthew is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 11:49 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
fail advice.

use the fit calculator off the stickies to figure out which length toptube is best for you.
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 12:43 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
heymatthew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 467

Bikes: Nashbar SSCX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I've used a fit calculator before and I'm still in between sizes. My height puts me in a larger bike, but my inseam, arm length and/or torso length put me into something different. Really, the best way to determine a bike size is to ride. But, as said above, you can always get a little longer stem to extend your reach on a frame that's a CM too small, versus not being able to shrink a bike that's too big (I once bought a 61cm based on a fit calculator and it was WAY too big for me).

Also, I prefer a slightly smaller bike, YMMV.
heymatthew is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 12:47 PM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
GENESTARWIND's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: las vegas
Posts: 1,938

Bikes: purty blue undefeated II 57cm

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 29 Post(s)
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
the general consensus from the more experienced folk around here is its easier to make a smaller bike bigger than a bigger bike smaller.

also remember that top tube length is far more important that seat tube length. as you will be sitting on the bike not standing over it while riding it.

Last edited by GENESTARWIND; 08-04-14 at 12:50 PM.
GENESTARWIND is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 01:10 PM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
heymatthew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Sumter, SC
Posts: 467

Bikes: Nashbar SSCX

Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Originally Posted by GENESTARWIND
the general consensus from the more experienced folk around here is its easier to make a smaller bike bigger than a bigger bike smaller.
This is what I've always found with my bikes.
heymatthew is offline  
Old 08-04-14, 02:39 PM
  #11  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I decided to go for the 53 with a marginally larger stem. I rode a few bikes today with 56 seat and top tubes and they're just tpp big for me. The fit calculator wants me to get something with a 57cm top tube and I feel way too uncomfortable on a bike that big. I should have the Steamer going by the end of this week. Pics to follow!
ThurberMingus is offline  
Old 08-06-14, 09:36 PM
  #12  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 31
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Tagged: 0 Thread(s)
Quoted: 0 Post(s)
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Follow up: I got the 53, I feel I made the right choice. I absolutely love this bike. I will post pics in the FGSS megathread tomorrow when it's sunny. Mods feel free to kill this thread or whatever. Question answered.
ThurberMingus is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sfh
Fitting Your Bike
3
11-29-17 05:58 PM
radioreligion
Fitting Your Bike
2
08-14-16 10:34 PM
Coldhands
Fitting Your Bike
3
08-01-16 05:12 AM
JWK
Touring
11
03-27-13 06:32 PM
moose8
Singlespeed & Fixed Gear
5
03-17-10 01:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.